Qumran calendrical texts

There are about twenty different texts from Qumran which deal with a 364-day solar calendar.[1] They are mainly very fragmentary, so the calendar is not completely understood. However, it is significantly different from the Babylonian lunar calendar which evolved into the 354-day Hebrew calendar as known today. The scrolls calendar divided the year into four quarters and recorded the feast days of the community. Feasts were fixed to the solar year and so occurred on different days from those indicated in the Babylonian-based calendar. Many of the texts are rosters of weekly shifts or courses of temple service for the twenty-four priestly families, known as Mishmarot.[2]

See also: Enoch calendar

Structure

The year is made up of twelve months, grouped in quarters. Each quarter contains three months; two of 30 days and one of 31 days, i.e. 91 days or 13 weeks, each quarter.[3] The following table shows a quarter of the year. (The day names are provided only to facilitate understanding. Other than the weekly Sabbath, the other days were merely numbered in the calendrical texts.)

 Months 1, 4, 7, 10   Months 2, 5, 8, 11   Months 3, 6, 9, 12 
Wed1815222961320274111825
Thurs2916233071421285121926
Fri3101724181522296132027
Sat4111825291623307142128
Sun5121926310172418152229
Mon6132027411182529162330
Tues71421285121926310172431

The year and each of its quarters starts on the same day, the fourth day of the week (Wednesday to us). This was the day when the sun was created in Genesis 1:14–18.

However, the calendar as we know it is 364 days long, making it one and a quarter days short of a true year. This means, if it were put into practice, it would quickly lose synchronisation with astronomical events. Because of this, Lawrence Schiffman has stated the view that "this calendar was never really put to the test except perhaps for a short period".[4] Uwe Glessmer has proposed on the basis of 4Q319 ("Otot") that the calendar was in fact intercalated, a week being added every seven years to keep it synchronised with the solar year.[5] Roger Beckwith suggested that the discrepancy between the calendar and the true year, though noticed, may not have been of concern to the community that used the calendar.[6]

Mishmarot

The Mishmarot are texts which outline the weekly courses of the twenty-four priestly families who perform duties in the temple. The order of families follows that found in 1 Chronicles 24:7–18.[7] Repeating the twenty-four over a period of six years completes a full cycle and the following year once again starts with the first of the priestly families.[8]

Here are a few entries in 4Q325 ("Mishmarot D"):

The beginning of the se[cond] month is [on the si]xth [day] of the course of Jedaiah. On the second of the month is the Sabbath of the course of Harim....[9]

As the years are traversed, Sabbaths and feast days are usually noted. For example (from 4Q326):

[.. on the evening of the fourteenth day of the month] is the Feast of Unleavened Bread. On the fou[rth day of the week is a holy assembly. On the twenty-fifth of the month is] a Sabbath. On the twenty-sixth of the month is the B[arley] Festival....[10]

The texts are quite fragmentary, but because so much of the material is formulaic, restoration is relatively easy.

One of these texts, the extremely fragmentary Mishmarot C (4Q322–324b), also contains a number of historical allusions, mentioning the names "Yohanan" (perhaps John Hyrcanus) and Shelamzion (Salome Alexandra). Illusive snippets of text read "Shelamzion entered..." and "Hyrcanus rebelled..." (presumably Hyrcanus II who rebelled against his brother Aristobulus II). Another fragment twice mentions "Amelios killed..." Aemilius Scaurus (one of Pompey's lieutenants in Judea in 63 BCE).[11]

Other texts

Among the calendrical works is 4Q317, which lists the phases of the moon with respect to the 364-day calendar, 4Q318 ("Brontologion"), which contains a section which used thunder (Ancient Greek: brontos) at various times to predict the future, and 4Q319 (Otot or "signs"), which analyzes certain events over a period of 294 years, i.e. six Jubilees.[12]

Footnotes
  1. Talmon, 2000, p. 108.
  2. Talmon, 2000, p. 110.
  3. Talmon, 2000, p. 109.
  4. Schiffman, 1994, p. 304.
  5. Glessmer, cited in VanderKam, 1998, p. 82.
  6. Beckwith cited in Stern, 2000, p. 180.
  7. VanderKam, 1998, p. 73.
  8. Wise et al., 1996, p. 300.
  9. Wise et al., 1996, p. 317.
  10. Wise et al., 1996, p. 318.
  11. Wise et al., 1996, pp. 314–316.
  12. Wise et al., 1996, pp. 301–309.

Bibliography
  • Uwe Glessmer, "Investigation of the Otot Text (4Q319) and Questions about Methodology", in Methods of Investigation Wise et al., pp. 429–440.
  • Uwe Glessmer, "Calendars in the Qumran Scrolls", in The Dead Sea scrolls after fifty years, Peter W. Flint and James C. Vanderkam. eds., Vol. 2 (Leiden: Brill, 1999) ISBN 9004110615 pp. 213–278.
  • Helen R. Jacobus. 'Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception: Ancient astronomy and Astrology in Early Judaism.' Leiden: Brill, 2014. ISBN 9789004284050
  • Lawrence Schiffman, Reclaiming the Dead Sea Scrolls (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1994) ISBN 9780300140224.
  • Sacha Stern, "Qumran Calendars: Theory and Practice", in The Dead Sea Scrolls: In Their Historical Context, Timothy Lim ed. (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 2000) ISBN 056708759X pp. 179–186.
  • Shemaryahu Talmon, "Calendars and Mishmarot", in Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Lawrence H. Schiffman & James C. VanderKam eds., Vol. 1 (Oxford, 2000) ISBN 0195137965 pp. 108–117.
  • James C. VanderKam, "Calendar Texts and the Origins of the Dead Sea Scroll Community", in Methods of Investigation Wise et al., pp. 371–388.
  • James C. VanderKam, Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Measuring Time (Routledge, 1998) ISBN 0415165148.
  • Michael O. Wise, "An Annalistic Calendar from Qumran", in Methods of Investigation Wise et al., pp. 389–408.
  • Michael Wise, Martin Abegg Jr., & Edward Cook, The Dead Sea Scrolls: A New Translation (HarperSanFrancisco, 1996) ISBN 0060692014 pp. 296–323.
  • Michael O. Wise, Norman Golb, John J. Collins, and Dennis Pardee, Methods of Investigation of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Khirbet Qumran Site (New York Academy of Sciences, 1994) ISBN 0897667948.
  • Geza Vermes, "The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English" (The Penguin Press, 1997) ISBN 0-14-027807-9.
gollark: You didn't have time? Isn't this quite a long challenge thing?
gollark: Also the fact that most stuff, even if it uses DC internally (most things probably do), runs off mains AC and has some sort of built-in/shipped-with-it power supply, and there aren't really common standards for high-powered lower-voltage DC connectors around. Except USB-C, I guess? That goes to 100W.
gollark: I guess it depends on exactly what you do, and the resistance of the wires.
gollark: Which is as far as I know more an issue of low voltages than DC itself, but DC means you can't change the voltage very easily.
gollark: There is the problem that low-voltage DC loses power more quickly over longer distances.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.