Peter Young (cricketer, born 1986)

Peter James William Young (born 14 September 1986) is an English former first-class cricketer.

Peter Young
Personal information
Full namePeter James William Young
Born (1986-09-14) 14 September 1986
Hammersmith, London, England
Height5 ft 10 in (1.78 m)
BattingLeft-handed
BowlingRight-arm fast-medium
RelationsEd Young (brother)
Domestic team information
YearsTeam
2006–2008Oxford UCCE
Career statistics
Competition First-class
Matches 9
Runs scored 280
Batting average 23.33
100s/50s –/1
Top score 54
Balls bowled 714
Wickets 4
Bowling average 113.50
5 wickets in innings –
10 wickets in match –
Best bowling 1/26
Catches/stumpings 4/–
Source: Cricinfo, 15 July 2020

Young was born at Hammersmith in September 1986. He was educated at Wellington College, before going up to Oxford Brookes University.[1] While studying at Oxford Brookes, he played first-class cricket for Oxford UCCE in 2006–08, making nine appearances.[2][notes 1] Young scored 280 runs in his nine matches, at an average of 23.33 and with a high score of 54, his only first-class half century.[3] With his right-arm medium-fast, he took 4 wickets with best figures of 1 for 26.[4] His brother, Ed, also played first-class cricket.

Notes and references
  1. Oxford UCCE differed from Oxford University Cricket Club in that it was open to students at Oxford Brookes University, whereas Oxford University Cricket Club is exclusively for students of the constituent colleges of the University of Oxford.
  1. "Player profile: Peter Young". CricketArchive. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  2. "First-Class Matches played by Peter Young". CricketArchive. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  3. "First-Class Batting and Fielding For Each Team by Peter Young". CricketArchive. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  4. "First-Class Bowling For Each Team by Peter Young". CricketArchive. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
gollark: I have heard it said that Google and such aren't that efficiently run, but just have money-printers operating somewhere.
gollark: GPUs can go up to many tens of TFLOP/s but only have a few tens of gigabytes of memory, which is 3 OOM off.
gollark: It seems like our computers actually have a lot *less* memory than processing now.
gollark: IIRC getting usefully sized quantum computers probably requires reworking lots of the technology.
gollark: Or the paperclip agent discovers optimized wire extrusion and attains 50% more paperclip per wire or something.

Peter Young at ESPNcricinfo

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.