Paesuri

The Paesuri or Paesures were an ancient pre-Roman Tribe of Lusitania, akin to the Lusitani, to whom they were a dependent tribe.

Main language areas in Iberia c. 300 BC

Origins

Mentioned by Pliny the Elder[1] and by a local epigraphic source, the 2nd Century AD Ponte de Alcântara inscription, near Cáceres,[2] along with the other Lusitani tribes, their ethnic and Linguistic affiliation has not yet been fully determined. It has been suggested that the Paesuri were of Thracian origin,[3] though to what extent they were celticized by their neighbors, the Lusitani, Gallaeci and Turduli Veteres, remains unclear.

Location

Located between the rivers Douro and Vacua or Vagua (Vouga), in the modern northern central Portugal, the Paesuri comprised four subtribes – Ireucutiori, Aravoni, Seareae and Paesicaeci or Paesici – which settled the mountains of Freita, Arada, and the northern slopes of Caramulo around the 5th Century BC.

History

Like their neighbours the Turduli Veteres and Gallaeci, the Paesuri did not fall under Carthaginian rule at the later 3rd Century BC and appear to have not taken part in the 2nd Punic War. It is still not clear if they played any significant role in the Lusitanian Wars of the 2nd century BC. Allied with the Lusitani, they bore the brunt of the first Roman thrusts into the Iberian northwest. In 138-136 BC Consul Decimus Junius Brutus certainly devastated their lands during his punitive campaign against the Lusitani and the Turduli Veteres.[4] Again the Paesuri suffered the same treatment in 61-60 BC, when they were forcibly incorporated into Hispania Ulterior province by the Propraetor Julius Caesar.[5]

Romanization

They were later aggregated by Emperor Augustus into the province of Lusitania in 27-13 BC.

gollark: Anyway, I don't have the compute available to do this sort of thing *regularly*.
gollark: That's probably too slow.
gollark: (newlines are because I am copypasting it out of a terminal)
gollark: Further output:> that would be a bit cheaty, but I suppose it could be done.<|endoftext|>I don't know exactly what it was going to involve, but I'm pretty sure it'd be a bit cheaty anyway.<|endoftext|>And there's probably a guide to do that, but I don't know exactly what I'm doing about that is doing it.<|endoftext|>I can't actually read the summary, though.<|endoftext|>No, it's on the roadmap though.<|endoftext|>The next update:> your code is binding and has some bits which aren't signed into my account.<|endoftext|>Not really. It's not going to be hard to make a userscript for it.<|endoftext|>You could also do that.<|endoftext|>It's not a forum thing here.<|endoftext|>The guide's up to the ones below the GDPR, which is neat.<|endoftext|>I'm working on a link-type guide to the actual forum, or something.<|endoftext|>They can't really do much testing, though, though, so you could
gollark: I know, right?

See also

Notes
  1. Pliny the Elder, Naturalis Historia, IV, 113.
  2. CIL II 760: Municipia / provinciae / Lusitaniae stipe / conlata quae opus / pontis perfecerunt / Igaetani / Lancienses Oppidani / Talori / Interannienses / Colarni / Lancienses Transcudani / Aravi / Meidubrigenses / Arabrigenses / Banienses / Paesures.
  3. Ferreira do Amaral, Povos Antigos em Portugal… (1997), p. 141.
  4. Appian, Iberiké, 73.
  5. Cassius Dio, Romaïké istoría, 37, 52-55.

References
  • Alarcão, Jorge de, O Domínio Romano em Portugal, Publicações Europa-América, Lisboa (1988) ISBN 972-1-02627-1
  • Alarcão, Jorge de et alii, De Ulisses a Viriato – O primeiro milénio a.C., Museu Nacional de Arqueologia, Instituto Português de Museus, Lisboa (1996) ISBN 972-8137-39-7
  • Amaral, João Ferreira do & Amaral, Augusto Ferreira do, Povos Antigos em Portugal – paleontologia do território hoje Português, Quetzal Editores, Lisboa (1997) ISBN 972-564-224-4
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.