Pérotin

Perotinus Magnus (fl. c. 1200), (Pérotin the Great, Magister Perotinus) was a composer from around the late 12th century, associated with the Notre Dame school of polyphony in Paris and the ars antiqua musical style. The title Magister Perotinus means that he was licensed to teach. The only information on his life with any degree of certainty comes from an anonymous English student at Notre Dame known as Anonymous IV. It is assumed that he was French and named Pérotin, a diminutive of Peter, but attempts to match him with persons in other documents remain speculative.

Pérotin
Musician, Illumination from the late 13c [lower-alpha 1]
Bornca. 1155/60[2][3]
Diedca. 1200/05[2][3] (or later)
NationalityFrench
Other namesPérotin the Great, Perotinus Magnus, Magister Perotinus
OccupationComposer
Known forPolyphony
Notable work
Viderunt omnes, Sederunt principes, Alleluia Nativitas

Life, and problems of identification
Notre-Dame Cathedral ca. 1450
Mediaeval choir, Paris

Pérotin, about whom little is known, most likely lived around the end of the 12th and beginning of the 13th century and is presumed to have been French.[4] The only definitive information on his life comes from a brief mention attributed to the musical theorist Johannes de Garlandia[lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3] (fl.c.1270–1320) in his De Mensurabili Musica,[6][7][8] and four references[9] in the works of an English student, known today as Anonymous IV,[lower-alpha 4][11][12] including this, most commonly cited paragraph;[13]

These rules were used in many older books; this was so during and after the time of Perotinus the Great. Nevertheless, they did not know how to distinguish these notes from those which will be presented shortly. This was so even since the time of Leo, because two ligated notes were put for the durational value of a brevis longa, and in a similar manner, three ligated notes were quite often used for a longa brevis, longa. People say Maître Leonin was the best composer of Organum (optimus organista), he composed the Great Organum Book for the gradual and antiphonary in order to prolong the divine service. This book remained in use until the time of the great Perotin who abridged it and composed clausules and sections that were many in number and better because he was the best composer of descant (optimus discantor). This Magister Perotinus made the best quadrupla, such as Viderunt and Sederunt, with an abundance of striking musical embellishments [colores armonicae artis]; likewise, the noblest tripla, such as Alleluia, Posui adiutorium and [Alleluia], Nativitas etc. He also made three-voice conductus, such as Salvatoris hodie, and two-voice conductus, such as Dum sigillum summi Patris, and also, among many others, monophonic conductus, such as Beata viscera etc. The book, that is, the books of Magister Perotinus, were in use in the choir of the Paris cathedral of the Blessed Virgin up to the time of Magister Robertus de Sabilone,[lower-alpha 5] and from his time up to the present day.[lower-alpha 6][15][16][4]

There have been many speculative attempts to identify Pérotin with members of the Notre Dame administration,[lower-alpha 7] but these have not generally been accepted.[4][18] Of the several people with that name (Petrus) that have been suggested, the commonest are Petrus Cantor (died 1197), who was a theologian, and another Petrus who was Succentor at Notre Dame ca. 1207–1238.[14][17][2] Of these two, Petrus Succentor has been suggested as more probable, in part on chronological grounds, and partly because of the succentor's role in overseeing the celebration of the liturgy in the cathedral (whose choir was dedicated 1182),[4] but this is purely speculative, resting on an assumption that the composer held some important rank in the cathedral hierarchy.[2][19]

Pérotin is considered to be the most important member of the Notre Dame school of polyphony, a group of composers working at or near the cathedral in Paris from about 1160 to 1250, creators of the ars antiqua style.[20] The dates of Pérotin's life and works have long been a subject of debate,[21] but are generally thought to be from about 1155/60 (or earlier) to around 1200/05 (or later), based on the evolution of French choral writing during this time (see Works), in particular, his apparent absence from the flowering of the French motet that occurred after 1210.[2][3][22]

Pérotin was one of very few composers of his day whose name has been preserved, and can be reliably attached to individual compositions, most of which have been transcribed.[23] Anonymous IV called him Magister Perotinus (Pérotinus the Master).[24] The title, employed also by Johannes de Garlandia, means that Perotinus, like Léonin, earned the degree magister artium, almost certainly in Paris, and that he was licensed to teach. However, only Anonymous IV employed the superlative Perotinus Magnus (Perotinus the Great).[11] The name Perotinus, the Latin diminutive of Petrus, is assumed to be derived from the French name Pérotin, diminutive of Pierre. However "Petrus" was one of the most common names in the Ile de France during the High Middle Ages, making further identification difficult.[11] The diminutive was presumably a mark of respect bestowed by his colleagues. The title Magnus was a mark of the esteem in which he was held, even long after his death.[4]

Work

Notre Dame School

The reign of Louis VII (1137–1180) witnessed a period of cultural innovation, in which appeared the Notre Dame school of musical composition, and the contributions of Léonin, who prepared two-part choral settings (organa) for all the major liturgical festivals.[25] This period in musical history has been described as a paradigm shift of lasting consequence in musical notation and rhythmic composition, with the development of the organum, clausula, conductus and motet.[26] The innovative nature of the Notre Dame style stands in contrast to its predecessor, that of the Abbey of St Martial, Limoges, replacing the monodic (monophonic) Gregorian chant with polyphony (more than one voice singing at a time). This was the beginning of polyphonic European church music. Organum at its roots involves simple doubling (organum duplum or organum purum) of a chant at intervals of a fourth or fifth, above or below.[27] This school also marked a transition from music that was essentially performance to a less ephemeral entity that was committed to parchment, preserved and transmitted to history. It is also the beginning of the idea of composers and compositions, the introduction of more than two voices and the treatment of vernacular texts. For the first time, rhythm became as important as pitch, to the extent that the music of this era came to be known as musica mensurabilis (music that can be measured). These developments and the notation that evolved laid the foundations of musical practice for centuries. The surviving manuscripts from the thirteenth century together with the contemporaneous treatises on musical theory constitute the musical era of ars antiqua. The Notre Dame repertory spread throughout Europe. In Paris polyphony was being performed in the late 1190s but later sources imply that some of the compositions date back as far as the 1160s. Although often linked to the construction of the cathedral itself, construction commenced in 1163 and the altar consecrated in 1182. However there was evidence of musical creativity there from the early twelfth century.[19]

Square notes. Pérotin's Salvatoris hodie

Léonin's work was distinguished by two distinctive organum styles, purum and discantus.[27][2] This early polyphonic organa was still firmly based on Gregorian chant, to which a second voice was added. The chant was called the tenor (cantus firmus or vox principalis),[28] which literally “holds” (Latin: tenere) the melody.[28] The tenor is based on an existing plainsong melody from the liturgical repertoire (such as the Alleluia, Verse or Gradual, from the Mass, or a Responsory or Benedicamus from the Office). This quotation of plainchant melody is a defining characteristic of thirteenth century musical genres.[29] In organum purum the tenor part was drawn out into long pedal points, while the upper part or duplum contrasted with it in a much freer rhythm, consisting of melisms (melismatic or several notes per syllable, compared to syllabic, a single note per syllable). In the second, discantus, style, the tenor was allowed to be melismatic, and the notes were quicker and more regular with the upper part becoming equally rhythmic. These more rhythmic sections were known as clausulae (puncta).[2] Another innovation was the standardization of note forms, and Léonin's new square notes were quickly adopted. Although he developed the discantus style, Léonin's strength was as a writer of organum purum.[2] The singing of organa fell into disuse by the mid thirteenth century.[14] Associated with the Notre Dame school, was Johannes de Garlandia, whose De mensurabili provided a theoretical basis, for Notre Dame polyphony is essentially musica mensurabilis, music that is measured in time. In his treatise, he defines three forms of polyphony, organum in speciali, copula, and discant, which are defined by the relationship of the voices to each other and by the rhythmic flow of each voice.[19]

Magnus liber organi
Illuminated page of Magnus liber[lower-alpha 8]

Léonin compiled his compositions into a book, the Magnus liber organi (Great Organum Book), around 1160. Pérotin's works are preserved in this compilation of early polyphonic church music, which was in the collection of the cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris.[lower-alpha 9] The Magnus liber also contains the work of his successors.[30] In addition to two-part organa, this book contains three- and four-part compositions in four distinct forms: organa, clausulae, conducti and motets, and three distinct styles. In the organum style the upper voices are highly mobile over a tenor voice moving in long unmeasured notes. The discant style has the tenor moving in measured notes, but still more slowly than the upper voices. The third style has all voices moving note on note, and is largely limited to conductus.[31] The surviving sources all commence with a four-voice organal setting of the Christmas Gradual, Viderunt omnes,[lower-alpha 10] believed to be Pérotin's, as most likely did the original Liber.[32] However, the manuscripts and fragments that survive[lower-alpha 11] date well into the thirteenth century, meaning that they are preserved in a form notated by musicians working several generations following Léonin and Pérotin.[34][35] This collection of music constitutes the earliest known record of polyphony to have the stability and circulation achieved earlier by monophonic Gregorian chant.[19]

Pérotin's musical forms and style
Alleluia nativitas
Modern transcription of passage showing use of fourths (blue:unison, red:third, black:fourth, magenta:fifth)Play 

Louis VII was succeeded by his son Philip II in 1179 and his reign was marked by integration and revision of the cultural shifts that had transpired under his father.[2] It was during this time that the compositions of Pérotin first appeared, and a shift towards a more predominant discantus style.[2] Pérotin is best known for his composition of both liturgical organa and non-liturgical conducti in which the voices move note on note. He pioneered the styles of organum triplum and organum quadruplum (three and four-part polyphony)[36][37] and his Viderunt omnes and Sederunt principes,[lower-alpha 12] Graduals for Christmas[lower-alpha 13] and the feast of St Stephen's Day (December 26) respectively[39][40] are among only a few organa quadrupla known, early polyphony having been restricted to two-part compositions.[3][37] With the addition of further parts, the compositions became known as motets, the most important form of polyphony of the period. Pérotin's two Graduals for the Christmas season represent the highest point of his style, with a large scale tonal design in which the massive pedal points sustain the swings between consecutive harmonies, and an intricate interplay among the three upper voices.[41] Pérotin also furthered the development of musical notation, moving it further from improvisation.[31] Despite this, we know nothing of how these works came about.[35]

In addition to his own compositions, as noted by Anonymous IV, Pérotin set about revising the Magnus Liber Organi.[2] Léonin's added duplum required skill, and had to be sung fast with up to 40 notes to one of the underlying chant, as a result of which the actual text progressed very slowly. Pérotin shortened these passages, while adding further voice parts to enrich the harmony.[42] The degree to which he did this has been debated due to the phrase abbreviavit eundem by Anonymous IV. Usually translated as abbreviate, it has been surmised that he shortened the Magnus liber by replacing organum purum with discant clausulae or simply replacing existing clausulae with shorter ones. Some 154 clausulae have been attributed to Pérotin but many other clausulae are elaborate compositions that would actually expand the compositions in the Liber, and these stylistically resemble his known works which are on a much grander scale than those of his predecessor, and hence do not represent "abbreviation". An alternative rendering of abbreviavit is to write down, suggesting that he actually prepared a new edition using his better developed system of rhythmic notation, including mensural notation, as mentioned by Anonymous IV.[4][43]

Two styles emerged from the organum duplum, the "florid" and "discant" (discantus). The former was more typical of Léonin, the latter of Pérotin, though this indirect attribution has been challenged.[44] Anonymous IV described Léonin as optimus organista (the best composer of organa) but Pérotin, who revised the former's Magnus Liber Organi (Great Organum Book), as optimus discantor referring to his discant composition.,[15] In the original discant organum duplum, the second voice follows the cantus firmus, note on note but at an interval, usually a fourth above. By contrast, in the florid organum, the upper or vox organalis voice wove shorter notes around the longer notes of the lower tenor chant.[28][45]

Pérotin's compositions

Anonymous IV mentions a number of compositions which he attributes to Pérotin,[4] including the four-voice Viderunt omnes and Sederunt principes, and the three-voice Alleluia "Posui adiutorium" and Alleluia "Nativitas".[46] Johannes de Garlandia states that the Magnus Liber commences with Perotin's four-part organa, and makes specific reference to the notation in the three-part Alleluya, Posui adiutorium.[lower-alpha 14][8] Other works are attributed to him by later scholars, such as Heinrich Husmann, on stylistic grounds,[47] all in the organum style, as well as the two-voice Dum sigillum summi Patris and the monophonic Beata viscera[lower-alpha 15][lower-alpha 16] in the conductus style.[4] (The conductus sets a rhymed Latin poem called a sequence to a repeated melody, much like a contemporary hymn.) By tradition, the four-part pieces of the Notre Dame school have been attributed to Pérotin, leaving the two-part pieces to Léonin.[20] The former include the three-part conductus Salvator hodie.[48][49] The latter is placed in the Mass for the Circumcision in a 13th century French manuscript.[33][4] Of these, the best known works are his Viderunt omnes and Sederunt principes.[31] These have been described as representing the peak of musical development of the time.[14][41]

Most of Pérotin's works are in polyphonic form of discant, including the quadrupla and tripla. Here the upper voices move in discant, as rhythmic counterpoint above the sustained tenor notes. This is consistent with Anonymous IV's description of him as optimus discantor. However, like Léonin, he is likely to have composed in every musical genre and style known to Notre Dame polyphony.[19] Pérotin's dates of activity have been approximated from some late 12th century edicts (Statuta et donationes piae)[50] of the Bishop of Paris, Odo (Eudes de Sully)[lower-alpha 17] (1196–1208), in 1198 and 1199. Rebuked by Pierre de Capuano, the papal legate of the time, the bishop sought to reform the rituals around the Christmas season, forbidding the boistrous costumed performances that existed at the time, in particular, the Feast of Fools.[51] His preference was for elaborate music in its stead,[38][52] calling for performance in organa triplo vel quadruplo for the Responsory and Benedicamus and other settings.[lower-alpha 18][31] The bishop's edicts are quite specific, and suggest that Pérotin's organum quadruplum Viderunt omnes was written for Christmas 1198, and his other organum quadruplum Sederunt Principes was composed for Saint Stephen's Day 1199, for the dedication of a new wing of the Notre Dame Cathedral.[lower-alpha 19] If written after this, they could not have been written till late 1200 or 1201, since for most of 1200 France lay under an interdict of Pope Innocent III which suppressed the celebration of church services.[55] Hans Tischler dates the revision of the Magnus Liber to around 1180/90.[2] Between the accounts of Anonymous IV, the episcopal edicts and the arrangements in the Magnus liber, the key compositions appear to be corroborated and assigned to this period.[38]

Pérotin composed music to at least five of the poems of the Chancellor of the cathedral, Philippe le Chancelier (Philip the Chancellor).[56] Philip, also a canon there, held that title at the cathedral from 1218 till his death in 1236,[57] suggesting a possible later date for Pérotin's setting of the former's Beata viscera (ca. 1220), or at least a terminus ante quem.[4] Others believe this poem was written much earlier, and hence place Pérotin's death as no later than 1205,[2] the bishop's edicts implying that Pérotin's work was well before this.[lower-alpha 20][38] Philip appears to have written a number of poems with the intention of them being set to music by Pérotin,[lower-alpha 21] and with him is given credit for the development of the motet.[58]

List of works

Anonymous IV identified seven works, that he presumably considered worthy of singling out, and these represent the only direct attribution. Subsequent authors have attributed works on stylistic and chronological grounds. These include Friedrich Ludwig (1910),[59] Heinrich Husmann (1940),[47] Hans Tischler (1950)[2] and Ethel Thurston (1970).[49] Husmann added an additional nine three-part organa, and five clausula to which Ludwig added numerous other clausula.[4] Other authors have attributed all the three-part organa in the Magnus Liber to Pérotin, which is unlikely. Nevertheless, two of the only three known four-part organa can be attributed to him.[2]

Pérotin's monophonic Beata viscera[lower-alpha 22]

Key: Anonymous IV (A), Johannes de Garlandia (G), Tischler (Ti), Thurston (Th), Husmann (H).[60][41][4] Numbers refer to folios in the F manuscript of the Magnus liber.[61]

Four-part organa

  • Viderunt omnes, continued with organal motet Homo cum mandato[37] (A)(Ti)(Th)(H) F1
  • Sederunt principes, with organal motet De Stephani roseo[37] (A)(Ti)(Th)(H)
  • Sederunt principes, continued with organal motet Adesse festina[37] (A)(Th)(H)

Three-part organa

  • Alleluia nativitas[15] (A)(Ti)(Th)(H) F31
  • Alleluia, Posui adiutorium (A)(G)(Ti)(H) F36
  • Alleluia, Dies sanctificatus (Ti)
  • Alleluia, Pascha nostrum (Ti)(H)
  • Alleluia, Dilexit Andream (H)
  • Stirps Yesse (Ti)
  • Virgo (Ti)(H)
  • Sancte Germane(H)
  • Terribilis(H)
  • Exiit sermo (H)

Conductus

  • French conductus motet Se i'ai ame: Ex semine (Th)
  • 3 part Conductus Salvatoris hodie (A)(Ti)(Th)(H) F307
  • 2 part Conductus Dum sigillum summi patris (A)(Ti)(Th)(H) F344
  • 1 part Conductus Beata viscera Marie virginis[15] (A)(Ti)(Th)(H)
  • 5 Benedicamus Domino (Ti) (3 (H))

3 part clausulas

  • In odorem (H)
  • Et illuminare (H)
  • Et gaudebit (H)
  • Et exaltavi (H)

2 part clausulas (numerous (H))

Doubtful

  • 4 part Clausula Mors (H)[2]

Influences

Pérotin has been described as the first modern composer in the Western tradition, radically transforming the work of his predecessors from a largely improvisatory technique to a distinct musical architecture.[57] Pérotin's music has influenced modern minimalist composers such as Steve Reich, particularly in Reich's work Proverb.[62][63]

gollark: OH REALLY?
gollark: OR DOES IT?
gollark: I have no idea what that corresponds to.
gollark: ... in Turkey?
gollark: They also have the advantage of being a socially-acceptable place to live independently or whatever and do weird and/or possibly reckless things, although it's possible this is partly marketing.

See also

Notes
  1. While this image (from cantiga 400) of Cantigas de Santa Maria has been used to illustrate recordings of Pérotin's music,[1] no verifiable portrait of Pérotin is known
  2. Sed proprietas praedieta vix tenetur in aliquibus, quod patet in quadruplieibus magistri Perrotini per totum in principio magni voluminis, quae quadrupla optima reperiuntur et proportionata et in eolore eonservata, ut manifeste ibidem patet[5]
  3. Johannes de Garland was long thought to be the author, but is more likely to have been the editor of an existing manuscript
  4. At one stage Anonymous IV was thought to be a pupil of Johannes de Garlandia, but this is unlikely,[7] and the name is a misnomer, derived from the title of notes by Charles-Edmond-Henri de Coussemaker, Anonymus IV. These were probably notes taken by the student in lectures[10]
  5. Robertus de Sabilone fl. 1250[14]
  6. Et nota, quod magister Leoninus, secundum quod dicebatur, fuit optimus organista, qui fecit magnum librumorgani de gradali et antifonario pro servitio divino multiplicando. Et fuit in usu usque ad tempus Perotini Magni, qui abbreviavit eundem et fecit clausulas sive puncta plurima meliora, quoniam optimus discantor erat, et melior quam Leoninus erat. Sed hoc non [est] dicendum de subtilitate organi etc. Ipse vero magister Perotinus fecit quadrupla optima sicut Viderunt, Sederunt cum habundantia colorum armonicae artis (...) similiter est tripla plurima nobilissima sicut Alleluia Posui adiutorium Nativitas
  7. For instance the elaborate reconstruction of his career by Craig Wright[17]
  8. Folio 8 of illuminated ms. I-Fl MS Pluteus 29.1 (F), a major source for the Magnus liber
  9. Three different versions of the Magnus liber exist, and also some additional fragments[30]
  10. Viderunt omnes fines terrae All the ends of the earth have seen
  11. One of the earliest, ca. 1227 being the Beauvais manuscript[33]
  12. Sederunt principes et adversum me loquebantur Princes sat and plotted against me
  13. At Notre Dame Viderunt was sung at the new feast of the Circumcision on January 1[38]
  14. Alia regula de eodem. Sed non probatur per istam artem, sed bene probatur per exemplum, quod invenitur in Alleluja Posui adjutorium, in triplo scilicet quatuor cum proprietate et perfectione et tres et tres et tres cum proprietate etc., ut sumitur in hoc exemplo
  15. O blessed womb
  16. Asensio 1997 maintains that the Beata was attributed to Pérotin by Anonymous IV [20]
  17. Odo de Soliaco Parisiensis Episcopus
  18. Matutini ab episcopo, vel decano, vel capellano incipiantur ordine debito consummandi, hoc adjecto quod tertium et sextum responsorium in organo (vel in triplo, vel in quadruplo) cantabuntur Matins by the bishop or dean or chaplain shall be conducted in the proper order so that the 3rd and 6th responsories be sung with organum (either in triple, or in quadruple (for an English translation of the 11998 edict, see Wright (1989, 239))[53][54]
  19. The bishop's letters attest to the development of organum duplum at Notre-Dame from the 1160s and its subsequent integration into all the great feasts of the liturgical calendar, not only in the responsorial chants of the Mass proper but also the Benedicamus Domino of vespers[52]
  20. It cannot be ascertained with certainty that Pérotin's works were not written before the episcopal edict[4]
  21. set as clausulae[2]
  22. Beata from Wolfenbüttel 1099 (W2) MS.

References
  1. RILM 2016.
  2. Tischler 1950.
  3. Tischler 1963.
  4. Roesner 2001.
  5. Garlandia 1972, i:96.
  6. Garlandia 1994.
  7. Baltzer 2001.
  8. Waite 1960.
  9. Dittmer 1959, 21,36,40,66.
  10. Taruskin 2006, 242.
  11. Wright 1989, 288.
  12. Anonymous IV 1967, i:46.
  13. Dittmer 1959, 36.
  14. Jenny 1942.
  15. Vellard 1986.
  16. Haines 2006.
  17. Wright 1989, 294.
  18. EWB 2004.
  19. Roesner 2018.
  20. Asensio 1997.
  21. Gastoué 1917.
  22. Sanders 1967.
  23. Anderson 1972.
  24. Pinegar 1995.
  25. Cedarville 2018.
  26. Bradley 2018, 1.
  27. Sherr 2019.
  28. Johnson 2012, 24.
  29. Bradley 2018, 3.
  30. Tischler 1984.
  31. Wallace 1993.
  32. Baltzer 1987.
  33. GB-Lbl Egerton 2615 2019.
  34. Fassler 1987.
  35. Bradley 2018, 4.
  36. EB 2016.
  37. Perotin 1999.
  38. Taruskin 2006, 243.
  39. Latham 2011, Sederunt principes.
  40. Latham 2011, Viderunt omnes.
  41. Hiley 2011.
  42. Wilson-Dickson 2003, 51.
  43. Berger 1996.
  44. Berger 2005, 40.
  45. Planchart 2000, 30.
  46. Anonymous IV 1967, 1:46, 82.
  47. Husmann 1940.
  48. Gattermayer 2006, 94.
  49. Perotin 1970.
  50. Migne 1855, 70–74.
  51. Wright 1989, 239.
  52. Gross 2011.
  53. Migne 1855, 72.
  54. Huglo 1982, 103.
  55. Clarke 2007, 179.
  56. Vauchez 2000, Pérotin.
  57. Wright 1989, 289.
  58. Wright 1989, 295.
  59. Ludwig 1978.
  60. Wright 1989, pp. 288–289.
  61. IMSLP 2019.
  62. Reich 2019.
  63. Lewis 2018.

Bibliography
Books
Historical sources
Chapters
Dictionaries and encyclopedias
Articles
Audiovisual
Websites

List of selected recordings

 for discography, see McComb (2019)

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.