Noah Carl
Noah Carl is a British sociologist and intelligence researcher. He was investigated and subsequently dismissed from his position as a Toby Jackman Newton Trust Research Fellow at St Edmund's College, Cambridge after over 500 academics signed a letter repudiating his research and public stance on race and intelligence, calling it "ethically suspect and methodologically flawed".[1][2] Newspaper columnists have criticised the decision to dismiss Carl as an attack on academic freedom.[3][4] Others justified the decision, arguing that Carl's work relied on "selective use of data and unsound statistical methods which have been used to legitimise racist stereotypes about groups", and alleging that he had collaborated with far-right extremists.[5][6][7][8]
Biography
Carl received a BA in Human Sciences, an MSc in Sociology and a DPhil in Sociology from the University of Oxford.[9] Prior to his appointment to the St Edmund's College, Cambridge fellowship, Carl received media attention for papers on the link between artistic tastes and views on Brexit,[10] the reasons why London pubs are disappearing,[11] and a study for Adam Smith Institute which found that conservatives were heavily underrepresented among academics at British universities.[12][13][14] Additionally, he was in the news for a study on the relationship between intelligence and trust in other members of society.[15][16]
His work has been published in academic journals such as Intelligence, the Journal of Biosocial Science, the British Journal of Sociology. He is the second most prolific contributor to Open Quantitative Sociology & Political Science, an online journal that has been described in the New Statesman as a "pseudo-science factory-farm", and he has contributed to Mankind Quarterly, which is described as a white supremacist journal.[17] According to an article in the New Statesman from February 2018, Carl had also published two papers on whether larger Muslim populations make terrorism more likely and one suggesting that British stereotypes about immigrants are "largely accurate".[18] In relation to the latter article, the New Statesman quoted Dr. Niko Yiannakoulias of McMaster University as commenting: "It is never OK to publish research this bad, even in an inconsequential online journal.”[18]
Carl has spoken twice at the London Conference on Intelligence, a private conference on human intelligence at which some attendees presented papers on race and intelligence and eugenics.[18] He was one of 15 attendees to collaborate on a letter defending the conference following media coverage. The letter was published in the journal Intelligence in September 2018.[19]
Appointment controversy
In December 2018, Carl was awarded the Toby Jackman Newton Trust Research Fellowship at St Edmund's College. More than 500 academics[1] signed a letter opposing Carl's appointment to the research fellowship, alleging that Carl's work was based on pseudoscience and discredited race sciences.[20] Mathematician Clément Mouhot was one of the organizers of the letter.[6] According to Toby Young, writing in the conservative magazine the Spectator, a counter-petition defending him has been signed by over 600 academics.[21]
An internal investigation concluded that his work "demonstrated poor scholarship, promoted extreme right-wing views and incited racial and religious hatred", and that it fell outside the normal protections for academic free speech as a result.[7][22] The investigation also found that Carl had "collaborated with a number of individuals who were known to hold extremist views" and concluded that continuing his affiliation would risk allowing the college to be used to "promote views that could incite racial or religious hatred" and damage the reputation of the college. Carl was subsequently dismissed from his fellowship.[6] A separate investigation into the appointment process itself found no irregularities in the process of recruiting Carl.[7]
An editorial in The Times was critical of the decision to terminate Carl's post, arguing that his "main offence seems to have been to challenge the “woke” left-wing orthodoxy".[3] Opinion columnists in The Telegraph and The Spectator also criticised the decision.[4][23]
In June 2019, Noah Carl began crowdfunding a legal challenge to his dismissal.[24][25] In September, 2019 his $100,000 fundraising goal was reached.[26]
References
- "Open Letter: No to Racist Pseudoscience at Cambridge". medium.com. 19 December 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2019.
- Parker, Charlie (1 May 2019). "Cambridge academic Noah Carl sacked over 'racist' study". The Times. Retrieved 2 May 2019.
- "The Times view on the sacking of Noah Carl: Monoversities". The Times. 10 May 2019.
- Mirza, Munira (5 May 2019). "Intolerant zealots are strangling the intellectual freedom of our universities". The Telegraph.
- Adams, Richard (1 May 2019). "Cambridge college sacks researcher over links with far right". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 May 2019.
- Adams, Richard (7 December 2018). "Cambridge gives role to academic accused of racist stereotyping". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 May 2019.
- "Statement from the Master regarding the outcome of the investigations into complaints about the appointment of Research Fellow" (PDF). 30 April 2019. Retrieved 8 May 2019.
- Busby, Eleanor (2 May 2019). "Cambridge University college sacks academic over links to far-right extremists".
- "Dr Noah Carl The Toby Jackman Newton Trust Research Fellow". St. Edmund's College website. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
- Hern, Alex (10 October 2018). "Brexiters like realism, remainers prefer impressionist art, study finds". Retrieved 7 December 2018.
- "Why London's pubs are disappearing". The Economist. 24 August 2017. Retrieved 10 December 2018.
- "British Universities Seen as Too Liberal, Intolerant". CNS News. 22 March 2017. Retrieved 8 December 2018.
- Hurst, Greg (2 March 2017). "Lurch to left raises concerns for campus free speech". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 8 December 2018.
- Moore, Charles (3 March 2017). "We must be ever vigilant of the Left's insidious domination of our institutions". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 8 December 2018.
- Beck, Julie (20 March 2014). "Study: Smarter People Are More Trusting". The Atlantic.
- "Studie der Universität Oxford: Warum dumme Menschen keinem trauen". Wirtschaftswoche (in German). 18 March 2014.
- Van der Merwe, Ben (20 December 2018). "No, objecting to Cambridge's appointment of a eugenicist is not about free speech". The New Statesman.
- Van Der Merwe, Ben (19 February 2018). "It might be a pseudo science, but students take the threat of eugenics seriously". New Statesman. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
- Woodley of Menie, Michael A.; Dutton, Edward; Figueredo, Aurelio-José; Carl, Noah; Debes, Fróði; Hertler, Steven; Irwing, Paul; Kura, Kenya; Lynn, Richard; Madison, Guy; Meisenberg, Gerhard; Miller, Edward M.; te Nijenhuis, Jan; Nyborg, Helmuth; Rindermann, Heiner (September 2018). "Communicating intelligence research: Media misrepresentation, the Gould Effect, and unexpected forces". Intelligence. 70: 84–87. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.04.002.
- Lally, Catherine (7 December 2018). "Cambridge dons revolt over 'racist' fellow's role". The Times. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
- Young, Toby (25 June 2019). "How Noah Carl is fighting back against Cambridge". Spectator.
- Bradbury, Rosie; Cook, Joe (30 April 2019). "Controversial research fellow Noah Carl dismissed by St Edmund's". Varsity Online. Retrieved 2 May 2019.
- Campbell, Hugh (4 May 2019). "The truth about Noah Carl". The Spectator.
- Bradbury, Rosie; van der Merwe, Ben (12 July 2019). "Developer who created crowdfunding site for white supremacists set up private limited company for Noah Carl". Varsity. Retrieved 26 June 2020.
- Young, Toby. "How Noah Carl is fighting back against Cambridge". The Spectator. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
- Stacey, Stephanie (24 September 2019). "Dismissed research fellow Noah Carl raises over $100,000 to fund legal action against Eddie's". Varsity. Retrieved 5 October 2019.
External links
- Noah Carl publications indexed by Google Scholar
- Discussion of the appointment controversy from BBC Two's Politics Live, 10 May 2019