Adam Smith Institute

The Adam Smith Institute (ASI) is a neoliberal (formerly libertarian) think tank and lobbying group based in the United Kingdom and named after Adam Smith, a Scottish moral philosopher and classical economist.[1][2][3] The libertarian label was officially changed to neoliberal on 10 October 2016.[4][5] The Institute advocates free market and classical liberal ideas, primarily via the formation of radical policy options with regard to public choice theory, which political decision makers seek to develop upon. ASI President Madsen Pirie has sought to describe the activity of the organisation as "[w]e propose things which people regard as being on the edge of lunacy. The next thing you know, they're on the edge of policy".[6]

Not to be confused with the Smith Institute or Adam Smith International
"Liberty League (UK)" redirects here. For the 1920s organization, see Liberty League (Historic).

Adam Smith Institute
AbbreviationASI
Formation1977 (1977)
TypeNeoliberal think tank
HeadquartersLondon, SW1
United Kingdom
Coordinates51.4979°N 0.1294°W / 51.4979; -0.1294
President
Director
Executive Director
Madsen Pirie
Eamonn Butler
Sam Bowman
Websiteadamsmith.org

The ASI formed the primary intellectual force behind privatisation of state-owned industries during the premiership of Margaret Thatcher[7] and alongside the Centre for Policy Studies and Institute of Economic Affairs advanced a neoliberal approach toward public policy on privatisation, taxation, education and healthcare.[8] A number of the policies presented by organisation were adopted by the administrations of John Major and Tony Blair and members of the ASI have also advised non-United Kingdom governments.[9][10]

Beyond policy development, the organisation advocates free market ideas through the publication and distribution of literature, the promotion of Tax Freedom Day, the hosting of speaker events for students and young people, media appearances and blogging.

History

Foundation
Madsen Pirie, President of the ASI, has been described as the leading architect of Margaret Thatcher's privatisation program[11]

Madsen Pirie and brothers Eamonn and Stuart Butler were students together at the University of St Andrews in Scotland.[12] Pirie left in 1974 to work for the Republican Study Committee in Washington D.C. and then took up a professorship in Philosophy at Hillsdale College. He was joined there by Stuart Butler while Eamonn Butler went to work with Edwin Feulner, who became co-founder and director of the free-market think tank The Heritage Foundation.

After their experience in the United States, they returned to the United Kingdom in 1977 to found their own think tank, called the Adam Smith Institute. After a year, Stuart Butler returned to the United States as Vice President of the Heritage in charge of domestic policy while Eamonn Butler remained with Madsen Pirie as co-directors of the Institute.

One of their St Andrews friends, Douglas Mason,[13] who had been active in the university's Conservative Association, did his most influential research and writing for the Institute. Mason became one of its regular authors.

The ASI's Omega Project (1981–1983) led by Peter Young produced a series of 19 papers shadowing each Department of State and advocated such things as the compulsory contracting-out of most local services such as refuse collection, the replacement of much of the welfare state by private insurance and further privatisation of public sector services and industries, including aspects of police services.[14][15][16] The Omega Project was very influential and many of its recommendations were adopted as policy and enacted into legislation.

Unlike some think tanks, the Institute chose not to retain charitable status, but instead it maintained the small Adam Smith Research Trust to fund mainstream academic educational projects.

Thatcher's inner circle

The Margaret Thatcher era saw the think tank movement come of age and achieve influence and with the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) and the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) and the ASI was one of three relied upon by the Thatcher government for policy.[10] Unlike the CPS, which had been established by Thatcher and Keith Joseph; and the IEA, which focused on more theoretical matters, the ASI was well-placed to produce bold and direct policies.[10] Despite this role, the Institute developed an iconoclastic reputation, cynical about politicians, but enthusiastic to engage with them.[10] The Institute's relationship with Thatcher was not without troubles. Although Madsen Pirie was the architect of much of the privatisation policy,[11] he had no emotional ties to Thatcher, nor did the ASI propose policies on a range of social issues despite its Thatcherite reputation.[17]

The ASI took the view that the market was "more genuinely democratic than the public sector, involving the decisions of far more individuals and at much more frequent intervals".[18] The Institute published Douglas Mason's recommendation that local government rates (the local government tax) should be replaced by a per-capita charge. A version of this was later implemented by the Conservative government introducing the Community Charge in Scotland in 1989 and in England and Wales in 1990. It brought unpopularity for the Thatcher government and was seen by some as having weakened her political hand ahead of her departure from office, though her attitude to Europe was a more significant factor.

Other policy recommendations which Douglas Mason published with the ASI included the privatisation of the Royal Mail (The Last Post − 1991); the introduction of charges in British public libraries (Ex Libris – 1986); the privatisation of the Forestry Commission;[19] the complete removal of arts subsidies (Expounding The Arts – 1987); and the abolition of restrictions on drinking (Time To Call Time – 1986).

After Thatcher

In November 1994, the Institute began a review of welfare reform called Operation Underclass,[20] aimed at methods of creating jobs for the long-term unemployed.[21] Some elements of the programme were adopted by the government within months.[20]

The ejection of the Conservative government in 1997 did not have as dramatic an effect on the ASI as some had anticipated. The Institute praised the government's welfare-to-work programmes, describing it as "the most successful policy initiative of this century".[22] The ASI publicly welcomed the news that Labour had implemented the long-held ASI aim of an independent Bank of England,[23] Madsen Pirie gave it a nine out of ten for performance.[24] Eamonn Butler has ascribed this flexibility to who is in power to their role not being "to be political or shout slogans", but to be "policy engineers".[25]

The ASI then collaborated with the MORI organisation on a series of opinion polls to measure such things as the goals of young people and students, and public attitudes to state services.

International work

In 1992, the Institute founded a consulting company, Adam Smith International Ltd, which was "charged with overseeing the overseas work of the institute [in] an attempt to capitalise on the growing international trend towards economic liberalization and marketization".[26] While Eamonn Butler and Madsen Pirie were as of 1998 members of the management board of both organisations,[26] the management teams of Adam Smith International and the Institute are now separate.[27]

Funding

Think tank Transparify, which is funded by the Open Society Foundations, ranked the Institute as one of the four least transparent think tanks in the United Kingdom in relation to funding. Transparify's report How Transparent are Think Tanks about Who Funds Them 2016? rated them as "highly opaque", one of "a handful of think tanks that refuse to reveal even the identities of their donors".[28] In 2016, the website Who Funds You? rated the Institute as E, the lowest transparency rating (rating goes from A to E).[29] TobaccoTactics, the website of the Tobacco Control Research Group at the University of Bath, details the Institute's funding by the tobacco industry.[30] The Guardian report that the Institute received three percent of its funding from the tobacco industry in 2013.[31]

Investigated for breaches of charities rules

In December 2018, the Institute, which consists of at least three different legal entities (a British company, a British charity and an American non-profit foundation), was reported to be under investigation by the Charity Commission for improper use of funds. Charities in England and Wales are required to be genuinely independent from other entities, and cannot perform political campaigning.[32] Contributors giving £1,000 a year were offered “opportunities to attend power lunches and patrons dinners with influential figures, including politicians, ministers, journalists and academics.”[33]

Activities

Tax Freedom Day

The Institute publishes the British version of Tax Freedom Day, the day in the year when the average person has earned enough to pay his or her annual tax bill.[34] The Institute calculates the figure by expressing the government's take of the economy as a percentage of the year, including all forms of taxation, direct and indirect, national and local.[34] The ASI uses Tax Freedom Day to draw attention to United Kingdom tax rates and fiscal policy in a dramatic and readily understandable way.

The Next Generation

The Institute facilitates regular meetings of young people who have interests in free markets and libertarian ideas. These 16- to 30-year olds form a group called The Next Generation (TNG). MPs and prominent media figures are typical guest speakers (for 10-minute speeches) at monthly meetings of The Next Generation The Liberty League, an affiliated network for groups across the United Kingdom, was founded by members of the TNG Committee.

The Liberty League was a United Kingdom student organisation in the early 2010s founded by James Lawson, William Hamilton and Anton Howes to support classical liberalism. Its annual Freedom Forum conference was transferred to the Institute.[35][36][37][38]

Influence

In January 2009, Foreign Policy and the University of Pennsylvania named the Institute among the top 10 think-tanks in the world outside of the United States.[39] The Institute is highly influential in United Kingdom public policy and was "a pioneer of privatisation"[40] in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Early Institute papers proposed the outsourcing of local government services (1980), the fundamentals of the poll tax (1981–1985)[41] and the deregulation and privatisation of transportation (1980). Other influences include the United Kingdom's cutting of the highest rate of income tax from 83% to 40% in the late 1980s and its liberalisation of alcohol licensing laws.

The Institute has released a series of Roadmap to Reform papers, calling for shifts in public policy in Health, Deregulation and Europe. In 2006, the Institute released a paper calling for a rethink of Britain's countryside policy.[42]

According to the 2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report (Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, University of Pennsylvania), the ASI is ranked number 69 (of 150) of the "Top Think Tanks Worldwide".[43]

Tax reform

As recommended by the Institute, the top tax rate was reduced from 60% to 40% in Thatcher's 1988 budget.

Prior to the Exchequer's 2008 pre-budget report, the ASI made a case for the personal income tax allowance to be raised to £12,000 (from the current £6,035 allowance) for all United Kingdom taxpayers. The policy was promoted as taking 7 million people out of the tax system, with low-income earners not paying tax at all although in fact low earners were still subject to both employer and employee National Insurance in addition to indirect tax such as VAT, council tax and in reality heavy tapering of tax credits and/or benefits such as housing and council tax benefit should also be borne in mind. Raising the allowance does benefit all income tax payers and in fact in cash terms those with incomes below £12,000 benefit less, with those earning less than £6,036 not benefiting at all. Despite this, marketing the policy as taking the poor out of the tax system was generally accepted in media reporting as recently as the 2015 general election, with both Conservatives and Liberal Democrats claiming credit for implementing the generally well-received policy. The ASI calculated that this reform would be equivalent to giving the average worker an extra £1,730 per year in gross pay, making them £100 per month better off. The cost to the Exchequer would be £18.9 billion.

A 2005 paper by the Institute proposed a flat-rate income tax of 22% for United Kingdom taxpayers, with the above-referenced tax-free personal allowance of £12,000.[44] City A.M. editor Allister Heath said of this report that "rarely has a think-tank publication been this influential so quickly. Its arguments have been dissected by the UK Treasury, are well known among the Shadow Treasury Team, have had an influence on some parts of the Liberal Democrats and were even adopted by several minor political parties".[45] The ASI continues to campaign for a flat tax.

Public sector reform

The Institute proposed that the National Health Service (NHS) establish an internal market with hospitals buying the use of facilities from other districts and from the private sector. Internal markets are now NHS policy. The ASI also recommended an internal market system for United Kingdom schools that would have state funds to follow students to independently run academic institutions. This approach to school funding was adopted by the Coalition and later the Conservative majority government.

National government

The Institute proposed that QUANGOs be reduced in number and subject to increased scrutiny. QUANGOs were subsequently cut by 20 percent and put under parliamentary review.

Local government

Following the Institute's call for the use of private businesses by local governments, many local services such as waste collection and cleaning were contracted out. Additionally, local governments are now required to solicit competitive bids for local services.

Welfare

The Institute called for a radical shake-up of welfare policy which would make work requirements absolutely central to the benefits system. Many of ASI's proposals subsequently became Conservative policy and some even found favour among Labour MPs and Liberal Democrats.

Health

The Institute lobbied for a change in VAT regulations to facilitate the outsourcing of ancillary hospital services. The government now requires a solicitation of bids from private contractors for cleaning and catering services. VAT regulations have been modified to put in-house work and outside tenders on an equal basis. It is estimated that these actions save £100 million per annum.

Education

The Education Reform Act 1988 reflected many policy changes proposed by the Institute, including increasing representation of parents on state school governing boards, shifting control of state schools from the local authority to the board and head teachers and abolishing fixed school catchment areas.[46]

Rail privatisation
Rail passengers in Great Britain from 1829–2019 showing the increase in passengers following privatisation

With its author Kenneth Irvine, the ASI pioneered the privatisation of British Rail with private companies competing for franchises on a separately owned national network (The Right Lines – 1987). This policy was enacted by John Major's government. The privatisation was followed by a large increase in passenger numbers.[47]

Buses

Urban and local bus services in the United Kingdom were deregulated in the early 1980s by Thatcher and the National Bus Company was privatised and broken up into more than 60 companies following the ASI's recommendation that the National Bus Company be broken up and urban and local bus services be opened to competition and choice.

Justice

In accordance with ASI's proposals, the government resolved to experiment with privately contracted prisons and electronic tracking tags for low-security prisoners.

Immigration

The Institute is one of the strongest defenders of immigration.[48]

Current viewpoints

Green belt

The ASI has written extensively about the effect the green belt has had on house prices by restricting where houses can be built. In its paper The Green Noose, the Institute wrote that "simply removing restrictions on land 10 minutes’ walk of a railway station would allow the development of 1 million more homes within the Green Belt surrounding London alone". The ASI believes that instead of simply putting a blanket ban on building in the areas surrounding cities, planning permission should be granted based on the environmental, historic and scientific value of the land.[49]

Rail policy

Amid ongoing debate about the railways, the ASI has been an advocate of the privatised system, writing that much of the rise in passenger numbers since privatisation cannot be attributed to other factors. It has called for increased competition through the use of open access operators or having two operators sharing a franchise and competing with each other.[47]

Publications
Books
  • Economy and Local Government, Eamonn Butler & Madsen Pirie, 1981 ISBN 978-0906517109
  • Aid by Enterprise, Eamonn Butler & Madsen Pirie, 1984 ISBN 978-0906517406
  • Hayek, Eamonn Butler, 1985 ISBN 978-0876634752
  • Milton Friedman: A Guide to His Economic Thought, Eamonn Butler, 1985 ISBN 978-0876634769
  • Micropolitics: Creation of a Successful Policy, Madsen Pirie, 1988 ISBN 978-0704531031
  • Wayward Elite: A Critique of British Teacher-Education, Dennis O'Keeffe, 1990 ISBN 978-1870109765
  • Adam Smith's Legacy, Norman Barry et al., 1990 ISBN 978-1870109840
  • A country at ease with itself, Michael Forsyth, 1991 ISBN 978-1873712023
  • Taming the Trade Unions, Eamonn Butler, 1991ISBN 978-0333531860
  • Blueprint for a Revolution, Madsen Pirie, 1993 ISBN 978-1873712375
  • Vision: Targets for Britain, Madsen Pirie, 1994 ISBN 978-1873712467
  • Shephard's Warning: Setting Schools Back on Course, Antony Flew, 1994 ISBN 978-1873712474
  • The End of the Welfare State, Eamonn Butler & Madsen Pirie, 1994 ISBN 978-1873712450
  • Readings in Liberalism (ed. Detmar Doering), 1995 ISBN 978-1873712399
  • Hayek: A Commemorative Album (ed. John Raybould), 1998 ISBN 978-1873712955
  • City in the Mist, Douglas Mason, 1998 ISBN 978-1873712993
  • Simply No Mistake: How the Stakeholder Pension Must Work, Eamonn Butler, 1998 ISBN 978-1902737218
  • The Future of the NHS, Eamonn Butler (ed. Dr. Michelle Tempest), 2008 ISBN 978-1858113692
  • Adam Smith – A Primer, Eamonn Butler, 2007 ISBN 978-0255366083
  • The Best Book on the Market, Eamonn Butler, 2008 ISBN 978-1906465056
  • Freedom 101, Madsen Pirie, 2008 ISBN 978-1902737560
  • The Rotten State of Britain, Eamonn Butler, 2009 ISBN 978-1906142346
  • Ludwig Von Mises: Fountainhead of the Modern Microeconomics Revolution, Eamonn Butler & Jeff Riggenbach, 2010 (Audiobook) ISBN 978-1441713087
  • Hayek: His Contribution to the Political and Economic Thought of Our Time, Eamonn Butler & Jeff Riggenbach, 2010 (Audiobook) ISBN 978-1441717580
  • The Alternative Manifesto, Eamonn Butler, 2010 ISBN 978-1906142698
  • Economics Made Simple, Madsen Pirie 2012 ISBN 978-0857191427
  • Think Tank, Madsen Pirie 2012 ISBN 978-1849541848
gollark: I want to use different programs for editing code and editing textual documents. Why? Because my IDE is optimized for programming - it has an integrated terminal, syntax highlighting, autocomplete, a few buttons for formatting, git integration, etc, and Word has formatting, embedding images, etc.
gollark: That's a terrible definition.
gollark: How do you even define "job"?
gollark: Well, yes, but we'd lose all existing programs, produce piles of specialized tooling, and do tons of extra work.
gollark: Yes.

See also

Footnotes
  1. Jones, Bill, ed. (1999). Political Issues in Britain Today (5th ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 6. ISBN 0719054311.
  2. Kandiah, Michael David; Seldon, Anthony, eds. (2013). Ideas and Think Tanks in Contemporary Britain. New York: Routledge. p. 77. ISBN 978-0714647432.
  3. Gilligan, Andrew (15 September 2012). "'Poverty barons' who make a fortune from taxpayer-funded aid budget". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 12 January 2016.
  4. "Adam Smith Institute on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  5. "Coming out as neoliberals". Adamsmith.org. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  6. Rusbridger, Alan (22 December 1987). "Adam Smith Institute's sense and nonsense". The Guardian. p. 30. Retrieved 19 January 2010.
  7. "Private Ayes". The Dallas Morning News. 5 January 1986. p. 38.
  8. "Britain weighs pleas to cut capital-gains and inheritance taxes". The Wall Street Journal. 6 February 1989.
  9. "Menem asks Adam Smith Institute for privatisation advice". The Guardian. 13 November 1989.
  10. Denham, Andrew; Garnett, Mark (January 1999). "Influence without responsibility? Think-tanks in Britain". Parliamentary Affairs. 51 (1): 46–57. doi:10.1093/pa/52.1.46.
  11. Brookes, Warren T. (4 May 1988). "Is Margaret Thatcher leading the way in education reform?". San Francisco Chronicle.
  12. Denham, Andrew and Garnett, Mark (1998). British Thinktanks and the Climate of Opinion, London: UCL Press, p. 155
  13. Butler, Eamonn (14 December 2004). "Douglas Mason: local councillor known as the 'father of the poll tax'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 1 October 2007. Retrieved 19 January 2010.
  14. Kavanagh, Dennis (1987). Thatcherism and British politics: the end of consensus?, Oxford University Press, p. 88)
  15. Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 157
  16. South, Nigel (1988). Policing for profit: the private security sector, London: Sage Publishing, p. 153)
  17. Pearce, Ed (19 April 1993). "The prophet of private profit – Dr Madsen Pirie". The Guardian.
  18. Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 158
  19. Butler (2004)
  20. "Replacing the welfare state". The Wall Street Journal. 16 February 1995.
  21. "Help for long-term unemployed urged". Financial Times. 7 November 1994.
  22. Atkinson, Mark (16 February 1998). "Rightwing think-tank applauds Blair on welfare-to-work". The Guardian. p. 3.
  23. Pirie, Madsen (15 June 1997). "Why Britain's best-known right-wing think tank is enjoying working with Tony Blair". Scotland on Sunday. p. 19.
  24. Campbell, Denis (15 June 1997). "Thatcherite guru gives Blair 9 out of 10 for performance". Scotland on Sunday. p. 1.
  25. Smith, David (1 May 1998). "Think tanks – who's hot (and who's not)". Management Today.
  26. Denham and Garnett (1998), p. 153
  27. "Management team - Adam Smith International". 8 May 2009. Archived from the original on 8 May 2009. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  28. "How transparent are think tanks about who funds them 2016?" (PDF). Transparify. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  29. "WhoFundsYou?". Archived from the original on 4 November 2016. Retrieved 30 November 2016.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
  30. "Adam Smith Institute". Tobac.tuxic.nl. Retrieved 1 December 2016.
  31. Doward, Jamie (1 June 2013). "Health groups dismayed by news 'big tobacco' funded rightwing thinktanks". Theguardian.com.
  32. Pegg, David; Evans, Rob; Lawrence, Felicity (1 December 2018). "Rightwing thinktank deletes offer of access to ministers for donors". the Guardian. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  33. Rightwing thinktank deletes offer of access to ministers for donors The Guardian
  34. Hill, Debbie (17 May 1998). "147 days at work foots the tax bill". The Sunday Times.
  35. Owen, James (22 March 2012). "The Champagne Flows in the City". The Independent. ProQuest 929400497.
  36. Croucher, James (10 October 2014). "Rise of the New Libertarians: Meet Britain's Next Political Generation". International Business Times. Retrieved 22 May 2017.
  37. "As the Social Attitudes Survey reveals softening views on welfare, is Britain moving to the Left?". City A.M. 10 September 2013. ProQuest 1431127967.
  38. "Generation Boris". economist.com. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
  39. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 6 January 2010. Retrieved 1 December 2018.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  40. The Influence of the Adam Smith Institute, Philip Morris, c 1994
  41. A poll tax was introduced in the UK in 1989/90. It was unpopular and abolished following replacement of Margaret Thatcher by John Major
  42. 'Woods and homes' green belt call, BBC News, 17 April 2006
  43. James G. McGann (Director) (4 February 2015). "2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report". Retrieved 14 February 2015. Other "Top Think Tank" rankings include No. 3 (of 80) in Domestic Economic Policy, No. 5 (of 50) in International Economic Policy, No. 17 (of 60) for Best Use of Social Networks, No. 40 (of 60) of Think Tanks with the Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program, No. 24 (of 70) for the Most Significant Impact on Public Policy, and No. 12 (of 60) for Outstanding Policy-Oriented Public Programs.
  45. Flat Tax – Towards a British Model Alistair Heath, 2006 p.104
  46. Open Access for UK Schools: What Britain Can Learn from Swedish Education Reform Archived 24 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  47. "What would we consider a successful railway system?". Adamsmith.org.
  48. Kirkup, James (17 December 2014). "From immigration to trade and the NHS, politics is about open vs closed". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 May 2017.
  49. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 19 March 2016. Retrieved 28 February 2016.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

References
  • Denham, Andrew; Garnett, Mark (1998). British Think-tanks and the Climate of Opinion. London: UCL Press. ISBN 978-1-85728-497-3.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.