Negative mass

In theoretical physics, negative mass is a type of exotic matter whose mass is of opposite sign to the mass of normal matter, e.g. −1 kg.[1][2] Such matter would violate one or more energy conditions and show some strange properties, stemming from the ambiguity as to whether attraction should refer to force or the oppositely oriented acceleration for negative mass. It is used in certain speculative hypotheses, such as on the construction of traversable wormholes and the Alcubierre drive. Currently, the closest known real representative of such exotic matter is a region of negative pressure density produced by the Casimir effect.

General relativity describes gravity and the laws of motion for both positive and negative energy particles, hence negative mass, but does not include the other fundamental forces. On the other hand, the Standard Model describes elementary particles and the other fundamental forces, but it does not include gravity. A unified theory that explicitly includes gravity along with the other fundamental forces may be needed for a better understanding of the concept of negative mass.

In December 2018, the astrophysicist Jamie Farnes from the University of Oxford proposed a "dark fluid" theory, related, in part, to notions of gravitationally repulsive negative masses, presented earlier by Albert Einstein, that may help better understand, in a testable manner, the considerable amounts of unknown dark matter and dark energy in the cosmos.[3][4]

In general relativity

Negative mass is any region of space in which for some observers the mass density is measured to be negative. This could occur due to a region of space in which the stress component of the Einstein stress–energy tensor is larger in magnitude than the mass density. All of these are violations of one or another variant of the positive energy condition of Einstein's general theory of relativity; however, the positive energy condition is not a required condition for the mathematical consistency of the theory.

Inertial versus gravitational mass

In considering negative mass, it is important to consider which of these concepts of mass are negative. Ever since Newton first formulated his theory of gravity, there have been at least three conceptually distinct quantities called mass:

• inertial mass – the mass m that appears in Newton's second law of motion, F = m a
• "active" gravitational mass – the mass that produces a gravitational field that other masses respond to
• "passive" gravitational mass – the mass that responds to an external gravitational field by accelerating.

The law of conservation of momentum requires that active and passive gravitational mass be identical. Einstein's equivalence principle postulates that inertial mass must equal passive gravitational mass, and all experimental evidence to date has found these are, indeed, always the same.

In most analyses of negative mass, it is assumed that the equivalence principle and conservation of momentum continue to apply, and therefore all three forms of mass are still the same, leading to the study of "negative mass". But the equivalence principle is simply an observational fact, and is not necessarily valid. If such a distinction is made, a "negative mass" can be of three kinds: whether the inertial mass is negative, the gravitational mass, or both.

In his 4th-prize essay for the 1951 Gravity Research Foundation competition, Joaquin Mazdak Luttinger considered the possibility of negative mass and how it would behave under gravitational and other forces.[5]

In 1957, following Luttinger's idea, Hermann Bondi suggested in a paper in Reviews of Modern Physics that mass might be negative as well as positive.[6] He pointed out that this does not entail a logical contradiction, as long as all three forms of mass are negative, but that the assumption of negative mass involves some counter-intuitive form of motion. For example, an object with negative inertial mass would be expected to accelerate in the opposite direction to that in which it was pushed (non-gravitationally).

There have been several other analyses of negative mass, such as the studies conducted by R. M. Price,[7] however none addressed the question of what kind of energy and momentum would be necessary to describe non-singular negative mass. Indeed, the Schwarzschild solution for negative mass parameter has a naked singularity at a fixed spatial position. The question that immediately comes up is, would it not be possible to smooth out the singularity with some kind of negative mass density. The answer is yes, but not with energy and momentum that satisfies the dominant energy condition. This is because if the energy and momentum satisfies the dominant energy condition within a spacetime that is asymptotically flat, which would be the case of smoothing out the singular negative mass Schwarzschild solution, then it must satisfy the positive energy theorem, i.e. its ADM mass must be positive, which is of course not the case.[8][9] However, it was noticed by Belletête and Paranjape that since the positive energy theorem does not apply to asymptotic de Sitter spacetime, it would actually be possible to smooth out, with energy–momentum that does satisfy the dominant energy condition, the singularity of the corresponding exact solution of negative mass Schwarzschild–de Sitter, which is the singular, exact solution of Einstein's equations with cosmological constant.[10] In a subsequent article, Mbarek and Paranjape showed that it is in fact possible to obtain the required deformation through the introduction of the energy–momentum of a perfect fluid.[11]

Runaway motion

Although no particles are known to have negative mass, physicists (primarily Hermann Bondi in 1957,[6] William B. Bonnor in 1964 and 1989,[12][13] then Robert L. Forward[14]) have been able to describe some of the anticipated properties such particles may have. Assuming that all three concepts of mass are equivalent according to the equivalence principle, the gravitational interactions between masses of arbitrary sign can be explored, based on the Newtonian approximation of the Einstein field equations. The interaction laws are then:

In yellow, the "preposterous" runaway motion of positive and negative masses described by Bondi and Bonnor.

• Positive mass attracts both other positive masses and negative masses.
• Negative mass repels both other negative masses and positive masses.

For two positive masses, nothing changes and there is a gravitational pull on each other causing an attraction. Two negative masses would repel because of their negative inertial masses. For different signs however, there is a push that repels the positive mass from the negative mass, and a pull that attracts the negative mass towards the positive one at the same time.

Hence Bondi pointed out that two objects of equal and opposite mass would produce a constant acceleration of the system towards the positive-mass object,[6] an effect called "runaway motion" by Bonnor who disregarded its physical existence, stating:

I regard the runaway (or self-accelerating) motion […] so preposterous that I prefer to rule it out by supposing that inertial mass is all positive or all negative.

— William B. Bonnor, in Negative mass in general relativity.[13]

Such a couple of objects would accelerate without limit (except relativistic one); however, the total mass, momentum and energy of the system would remain zero. This behavior is completely inconsistent with a common-sense approach and the expected behavior of "normal" matter. Thomas Gold even hinted that the runaway linear motion could be used in a perpetual motion machine if converted as a circular motion:

What happens if one attaches a negative and positive mass pair to the rim of a wheel? This is incompatible with general relativity, for the device gets more massive.

— Thomas Gold, in Negative mass in general relativity.[15]

But Forward showed that the phenomenon is mathematically consistent and introduces no violation of conservation laws.[14] If the masses are equal in magnitude but opposite in sign, then the momentum of the system remains zero if they both travel together and accelerate together, no matter what their speed:

${\displaystyle p_{\mathrm {sys} }=mv+(-m)v={\big (}m+(-m){\big )}v=0\times v=0.}$

And equivalently for the kinetic energy:

${\displaystyle E_{\mathrm {k,sys} }={\tfrac {1}{2}}mv^{2}+{\tfrac {1}{2}}(-m)v^{2}={\tfrac {1}{2}}{\big (}m+(-m){\big )}v^{2}={\tfrac {1}{2}}(0)v^{2}=0}$

However, this is perhaps not exactly valid if the energy in the gravitational field is taken into account.

Forward extended Bondi's analysis to additional cases, and showed that even if the two masses m⁽⁻⁾ and m⁽⁺⁾ are not the same, the conservation laws remain unbroken. This is true even when relativistic effects are considered, so long as inertial mass, not rest mass, is equal to gravitational mass.

This behaviour can produce bizarre results: for instance, a gas containing a mixture of positive and negative matter particles will have the positive matter portion increase in temperature without bound. However, the negative matter portion gains negative temperature at the same rate, again balancing out. Geoffrey A. Landis pointed out other implications of Forward's analysis,[16] including noting that although negative mass particles would repel each other gravitationally, the electrostatic force would be attractive for like charges and repulsive for opposite charges.

Forward used the properties of negative-mass matter to create the concept of diametric drive, a design for spacecraft propulsion using negative mass that requires no energy input and no reaction mass to achieve arbitrarily high acceleration.

Bimetric solution for the runaway motion paradox

Main article: Bimetric gravity

In green, gravitational interactions in bimetric theories which differ from those elaborated by Bondi and Bonnor, solving the runaway paradox.

Through bimetric Newtonian approximation, Jean-Pierre Petit proposed a solution for the runaway motion paradox in which:[17][18][19]

• Like masses attract (positive mass attracts positive mass, negative mass attracts negative mass).
• Unlike masses repel (positive mass and negative mass repel each other).

Although the mathematics is not trivial, the dynamic of the system can be presented using the following simplification (from the positive mass point of view):

A possible interpretation of the bimetric solution from the positive mass point of view: in transparent blue is the force experienced by each mass, in opaque blue is how the latter reacts to it.

• Two positive masses exert a force on each other that points inward and both masses will react to it by accelerating inward (i.e., the gravitation law we are familiar with)
• Two negative masses exert a force on each other that points outward, but both masses, being negative, will react to it by accelerating inward (the final effect will be indistinguishable from the Newton's law we are familiar with)
• Between a positive and a negative mass, the positive mass exerts a force on the negative mass that points inward, but the negative mass will react to it by accelerating outward; on the other side, the negative mass exerts a force on the positive mass that points outward and this reacts to it accordingly by accelerating outward; the final result will appear as a symmetric repulsive force between the two opposite masses (an “anti-Newton's law”)

Those laws are different to the laws described by Bondi and Bonnor, and solve the runaway paradox.

To do this, they refer to the Janus cosmological model developed by Petit, where gravitation could be described by a bimetric model which would extend general relativity.[20][21]

Improved in 2015 to justify the acceleration of the expansion of the universe,[19][22] the 2014 (and 22 November 2016) version of the model was criticized by the physicist Thibault Damour in a 4 January 2019 analysis, which demonstrated internal inconsistency in the model.[23][24] Since then, further changes have been made to the model, in an article published later in January 2019.[25]

Petit's work on this subject did not have much resonance among cosmologists. Nevertheless, independent studies of bimetric gravity with positive and negative masses led to the same conclusions regarding the laws of gravity.[26][27][28] Consequently, NASA is considering the implications of negative mass for faster than light propulsion and/or wormholes (or equivalent).[29]

Arrow of time and energy inversion

In quantum mechanics

See also: T-symmetry § Time reversal in quantum mechanics, and T-symmetry § Anti-unitary representation of time reversal

In quantum mechanics, the time reversal operator is complex, and can either be unitary or antiunitary. In quantum field theory, T has been arbitrarily chosen to be antiunitary for the purpose of avoiding the existence of negative energy states:

At this point we have not yet decided whether ${\displaystyle {\text{P}}}$ and ${\displaystyle {\text{T}}}$ are linear and unitary or antilinear and antiunitary.

The decision is an easy one. Setting ${\displaystyle \rho =0}$ in Eq. (2.6.4) gives

${\displaystyle {\text{P}}\,i\,H\,{\text{P}}^{-1}\,=\,i\,H{\text{,}}}$

where ${\displaystyle H\equiv P^{0}}$ is the energy operator. If ${\displaystyle {\text{P}}}$ were antiunitary and antilinear then it would anticommute with ${\displaystyle i}$, so ${\displaystyle {\text{P}}H{\text{P}}^{-1}=-H}$. But then for any state ${\displaystyle \Psi }$ of energy ${\displaystyle E>0}$, there would have to be another state ${\displaystyle {\text{P}}^{-1}\Psi }$ of energy ${\displaystyle -E<0}$. There are no states of negative energy (energy less than that of the vacuum), so we are forced to choose the other alternative: ${\displaystyle {\text{P}}}$ is linear and unitary, and commutes rather than anticommutes with ${\displaystyle {\text{H}}}$.
On the other hand, setting ${\displaystyle \rho =0}$ in Eq. (2.6.6) yields

${\displaystyle {\text{T}}\,i\,H\,{\text{T}}^{-1}\,=\,-i\,H{\text{.}}}$

If we supposed that ${\displaystyle {\text{T}}}$ is linear and unitary then we could simply cancel the ${\displaystyle i}$s, and find ${\displaystyle {\text{T}}H{\text{T}}^{-1}=-H}$, with the again disastrous conclusion that for any state ${\displaystyle \Psi }$ of energy ${\displaystyle E}$, there is another state ${\displaystyle {\text{T}}^{-1}\Psi }$ of energy ${\displaystyle -E}$. To avoid this, we are forced here to conclude that ${\displaystyle {\text{T}}}$ is antilinear and antiunitary.

— Steven Weinberg, in The Quantum Theory of Fields.[30]

On the contrary, if the time reversal operator is chosen to be unitary (in conjunction with a unitary parity operator) in relativistic quantum mechanics, unitary PT-symmetry produces energy (and mass) inversion.[31]

In dynamical systems theory

In group theoretical approach to dynamical systems analysis, the time reversal operator is real, and time reversal produces energy (and mass) inversion.

In 1970, Jean-Marie Souriau demonstrated, using Kirillov's orbit method and the coadjoint representation of the full dynamical Poincaré group, i.e. the group action on the dual space of its Lie algebra (or Lie coalgebra), that reversing the arrow of time is equal to reversing the energy of a particle (hence its mass, if the particle has one).[32][33]

In general relativity, the universe is described as a Riemannian manifold associated to a metric tensor solution of Einstein's field equations. In such a framework, the runaway motion forbids the existence of negative matter.[6][13]

Some bimetric theories of the universe propose that two parallel universes with an opposite arrow of time may exist instead of one, linked together by the Big Bang and interacting only through gravitation.[34][17][35] The universe is then described as a manifold associated to two Riemannian metrics (one with positive mass matter and the other with negative mass matter). According to group theory, the matter of the conjugated metric would appear to the matter of the other metric as having opposite mass and arrow of time (though its proper time would remain positive). The coupled metrics have their own geodesics and are solutions of two coupled field equations.[27][36][18][19]

The negative matter of the coupled metric, interacting with the matter of the other metric via gravity, could be an alternative candidate for the explanation of dark matter, dark energy, cosmic inflation and accelerating universe.[27][36][18][19]

In Gauss's law of gravity

In electromagnetism, one can derive the energy density of a field from Gauss's law, assuming the curl of the field is 0. Performing the same calculation using Gauss's law for gravity produces a negative energy density for a gravitational field.

Gravitational interaction of antimatter

Main article: Gravitational interaction of antimatter

The overwhelming consensus among physicists is that antimatter has positive mass and should be affected by gravity just like normal matter. Direct experiments on neutral antihydrogen have not been sensitive enough to detect any difference between the gravitational interaction of antimatter, compared to normal matter.[37]

Bubble chamber experiments provide further evidence that antiparticles have the same inertial mass as their normal counterparts. In these experiments, the chamber is subjected to a constant magnetic field that causes charged particles to travel in helical paths, the radius and direction of which correspond to the ratio of electric charge to inertial mass. Particle–antiparticle pairs are seen to travel in helices with opposite directions but identical radii, implying that the ratios differ only in sign; but this does not indicate whether it is the charge or the inertial mass that is inverted. However, particle–antiparticle pairs are observed to electrically attract one another. This behavior implies that both have positive inertial mass and opposite charges; if the reverse were true, then the particle with positive inertial mass would be repelled from its antiparticle partner.

Experimentation

Physicist Peter Engels and a team of colleagues at Washington State University reported the observation of negative mass behavior in rubidium atoms. On 10 April 2017, Engels team created negative effective mass by reducing the temperature of rubidium atoms to near absolute zero, generating a Bose–Einstein condensate. By using a laser-trap, the team were able to reverse the spin of some of the rubidium atoms in this state, and observed that once released from the trap, the atoms expanded and displayed properties of negative mass, in particular accelerating towards a pushing force instead of away from it.[38][39] This kind of negative effective mass is analogous to the well-known apparent negative effective mass of electrons in the upper part of the dispersion bands in solids.[40] However, neither case is negative mass for the purposes of the stress–energy tensor.

Some recent work with metamaterials suggests that some as-yet-undiscovered composite of superconductors, metamaterials and normal matter could exhibit signs of negative effective mass in much the same way as low temperature alloys melt at below the melting point of their components or some semiconductors have negative differential resistance.[41][42]

In quantum mechanics

In 1928, Paul Dirac's theory of elementary particles, now part of the Standard Model, already included negative solutions.[43] The Standard Model is a generalization of quantum electrodynamics (QED) and negative mass is already built into the theory.

Morris, Thorne and Yurtsever[44] pointed out that the quantum mechanics of the Casimir effect can be used to produce a locally mass-negative region of space–time. In this article, and subsequent work by others, they showed that negative matter could be used to stabilize a wormhole. Cramer et al. argue that such wormholes might have been created in the early universe, stabilized by negative-mass loops of cosmic string.[45] Stephen Hawking has proved that negative energy is a necessary condition for the creation of a closed timelike curve by manipulation of gravitational fields within a finite region of space;[46] this proves, for example, that a finite Tipler cylinder cannot be used as a time machine.

Schrödinger equation

For energy eigenstates of the Schrödinger equation, the wavefunction is wavelike wherever the particle's energy is greater than the local potential, and exponential-like (evanescent) wherever it is less. Naively, this would imply kinetic energy is negative in evanescent regions (to cancel the local potential). However, kinetic energy is an operator in quantum mechanics, and its expectation value is always positive, summing with the expectation value of the potential energy to yield the energy eigenvalue.

For wavefunctions of particles with zero rest mass (such as photons), this means that any evanescent portions of the wavefunction would be associated with a local negative mass–energy. However, the Schrödinger equation does not apply to massless particles; instead the Klein–Gordon equation is required.

In special relativity

See also: Exotic matter and Faster-than-light

One can achieve a negative mass independent of negative energy. According to mass–energy equivalence, mass m is in proportion to energy E and the coefficient of proportionality is c². Actually, m is still equivalent to E although the coefficient is another constant[47] such as −c².[48] In this case, it is unnecessary to introduce a negative energy because the mass can be negative although the energy is positive. That is to say,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}E&=-mc^{2}>0\\m&=-{\frac {E}{c^{2}}}<0\end{aligned}}}$

Under the circumstances,

${\displaystyle dE=F\,ds={\frac {dp}{dt}}\,ds={\frac {ds}{dt}}\,dp=v\,dp=v\,d(mv)}$

and so,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}-c^{2}\,dm&=v\,d(mv)\\-c^{2}(2m)\,dm&=2mv\,d(mv)\\-c^{2}\,d(m^{2})&=d(m^{2}v^{2})\\-m^{2}c^{2}&=m^{2}v^{2}+C\end{aligned}}}$

When v = 0,

${\displaystyle C=-m_{0}^{2}c^{2}}$

Consequently,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}-m^{2}c^{2}&=m^{2}v^{2}-m_{0}^{2}c^{2}\\m&={\frac {m_{0}}{\sqrt {1+{\frac {v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}}}\end{aligned}}}$

where m₀ < 0 is invariant mass and invariant energy equals E₀ = −m₀c² > 0. The squared mass is still positive and the particle can be stable.

From the above relation,

${\displaystyle p=mv={\frac {m_{0}v}{\sqrt {1+{\frac {v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}}}<0}$

The negative momentum is applied to explain negative refraction, the inverse Doppler effect and the reverse Cherenkov effect observed in a negative index metamaterial. The radiation pressure in the metamaterial is also negative[49] because the force is defined as F = dp/dt. Negative pressure exists in dark energy too. Using these above equations, the energy–momentum relation should be

${\displaystyle E^{2}=-p^{2}c^{2}+m_{0}^{2}c^{4}}$

Substituting the Planck–Einstein relation E = ħω and de Broglie's p = ħk, we obtain the following dispersion relation

${\displaystyle \omega ^{2}=-k^{2}c^{2}+\omega _{\mathrm {p} }^{2}\,,\quad \left(E_{0}=\hbar \omega _{\mathrm {p} }=-m_{0}c^{2}>0\right)}$

when the wave consists of a stream of particles whose energy–momentum relation is ${\displaystyle E^{2}=-p^{2}c^{2}+m_{0}^{2}c^{4}}$ (wave–particle duality) and can be excited in a negative index metamaterial. The velocity of such a particle is equal to

${\displaystyle v=c{\sqrt {{\frac {E_{0}^{2}}{E^{2}}}-1}}=c{\sqrt {{\frac {\omega _{\mathrm {p} }^{2}}{\omega ^{2}}}-1}}}$

and range is from zero to infinity

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\omega _{\mathrm {p} }^{2}}{\omega ^{2}}}&<2\,,\quad {\mbox{when }}v<c\\{\frac {\omega _{\mathrm {p} }^{2}}{\omega ^{2}}}&>2\,,\quad {\mbox{when }}v>c\end{aligned}}}$

Moreover, the kinetic energy is also negative

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}E_{\mathrm {k} }&=E-E_{0}\\&=-mc^{2}-\left(-m_{0}c^{2}\right)\\&=-{\frac {m_{0}c^{2}}{\sqrt {1+{\frac {v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}}}+m_{0}c^{2}\\&=m_{0}c^{2}\left(1-{\frac {1}{\sqrt {1+{\frac {v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}}}\right)<0\,,\quad \left({\mbox{where }}m_{0}<0\right)\end{aligned}}}$

In fact, negative kinetic energy exists in some models[50] to describe dark energy (phantom energy) whose pressure is negative. In this way, the negative mass of exotic matter is now associated with negative momentum, negative pressure, negative kinetic energy and faster-than-light phenomena.

See also

• Alcubierre drive
• Antimatter
• Dark energy
• Dark fluid
• Dark matter
• Exotic matter
• Imaginary mass
• Mirror matter
• Warp-field experiments
• Woodward effect

References

1. "Scientists observe liquid with 'negative mass', ich turns physics completely upside down", The Independent, 21 April 2017.
2. "Scientists create fluid that seems to defy physics:'Negative mass' reacts opposite to any known physical property we know", CBC, 20 April 2017
3. University of Oxford (5 December 2018). "Bringing balance to the universe: New theory could explain missing 95 percent of the cosmos". EurekAlert!. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
4. Farnes, J.S. (2018). "A Unifying Theory of Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Negative Masses and Matter Creation within a Modified ΛCDM Framework". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 620: A92. arXiv:1712.07962. Bibcode:2018A&A...620A..92F. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832898.
5. Luttinger, J. M. (1951). "On "Negative" mass in the theory of gravitation" (PDF). Gravity Research Foundation. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
6. Bondi, H. (1957). "Negative Mass in General Relativity" (PDF). Reviews of Modern Physics. 29 (3): 423–428. Bibcode:1957RvMP...29..423B. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.423.
7. Price, R. M. (1993). "Negative mass can be positively amusing" (PDF). Am. J. Phys. 61 (3): 216. Bibcode:1993AmJPh..61..216P. doi:10.1119/1.17293.
8. Shoen, R.; Yao, S.-T. (1979). "On the proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity" (PDF). Commun. Math. Phys. 65 (1): 45–76. Bibcode:1979CMaPh..65...45S. doi:10.1007/BF01940959. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 May 2017. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
9. Witten, Edward (1981). "A new proof of the positive energy theorem". Comm. Math. Phys. 80 (3): 381–402. Bibcode:1981CMaPh..80..381W. doi:10.1007/bf01208277.
10. Belletête, Jonathan; Paranjape, Manu (2013). "On Negative Mass". Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. 22 (12): 1341017. arXiv:1304.1566. Bibcode:2013IJMPD..2241017B. doi:10.1142/S0218271813410174.
11. Mbarek, Saoussen; Paranjape, Manu (2014). "Negative Mass Bubbles in De Sitter Spacetime". Phys. Rev. D. 90 (10): 101502. arXiv:1407.1457. Bibcode:2014PhRvD..90j1502M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.101502.
12. Bonnor, W. B.; Swaminarayan, N. S. (June 1964). "An exact solution for uniformly accelerated particles in general relativity". Zeitschrift für Physik. 177 (3): 240–256. Bibcode:1964ZPhy..177..240B. doi:10.1007/BF01375497.
13. Bonnor, W. B. (1989). "Negative mass in general relativity". General Relativity and Gravitation. 21 (11): 1143–1157. Bibcode:1989GReGr..21.1143B. doi:10.1007/BF00763458.
14. Forward, R. L. (1990). "Negative matter propulsion". Journal of Propulsion and Power. 6: 28–37. doi:10.2514/3.23219.
15. Bondi, H.; Bergmann, P.; Gold, T.; Pirani, F. (January 1957). "Negative mass in general relativity". In M. DeWitt, Cécile; Rickles, Dean (eds.). The Role of Gravitation in Physics: Report from the 1957 Chapel Hill Conference. Open Access Epubli 2011. ISBN 978-3869319636. Retrieved 21 December 2018.
16. Landis, G. (1991). "Comments on Negative Mass Propulsion". J. Propulsion and Power. 7 (2): 304. doi:10.2514/3.23327.
17. Petit, J.P. (1995). "Twin universes cosmology". Astrophysics and Space Science. 226 (2): 273–307. Bibcode:1995Ap&SS.226..273P. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.692.7762. doi:10.1007/BF00627375. Retrieved 18 June 2020.
18. Petit, J.P.; d'Agostini, G. (2014). "Negative mass hypothesis in cosmology and the nature of dark energy". Astrophysics and Space Science. 354 (2): 611. Bibcode:2014Ap&SS.354..611P. doi:10.1007/s10509-014-2106-5.
19. Petit, J.P.; d'Agostini, G. (2014). "Cosmological bimetric model with interacting positive and negative masses and two different speeds of light, in agreement with the observed acceleration of the Universe". Modern Physics Letters A. 29 (34): 1450182. Bibcode:2014MPLA...2950182P. doi:10.1142/S021773231450182X.
20. Jean-Pierre Petit et Gilles dAgostini. "Can negative mass be considered in General Relativity?" (PDF). ArXiv.org.
21. Petit, Jean-Pierre (1994). "The missing-mass problem" (PDF). Il Nuovo Cimento B. 109 (7): 697–709. Bibcode:1994NCimB.109..697P. doi:10.1007/BF02722527. Retrieved 15 August 2020.
22. Petit, Jean-Pierre; D’Agostini, G. (2015). "Lagrangian derivation of the two coupled field equations in the Janus cosmological model" (PDF). Astrophysics and Space Science. 357 (1): 67. doi:10.1007/s10509-015-2250-6. ISSN 0004-640X.
23. Thibault Damour. "Sur le "modèle Janus" de J. P. Petit" (pdf). www.ihes.fr (in French).
24. Damour quotes two Petit's publications dated 2014 on which he made his analysis. Moreover, he also used various documents, including “Le Modèle Cosmologique Janus, 22 novembre 2016” (The Janus cosmological model, 22 November 2016). Exact quote in French "Les équations de base qui définissent “le modèle Janus” (d’après les références citées ci-dessus, complétées par, notamment, la page 39 du document “Le Modèle Cosmologique Janus, 22 novembre 2016”)".
25. Petit, Jean-Pierre; d'Agostini, G.; Debergh, N. (2019). "Physical and mathematical consistency of the Janus Cosmological Model (JCM)" (PDF). Progress in Physics. Retrieved 15 August 2020.
26. Henry-Couannier, F. (2005). "Discrete symmetries and general relativity, the dark side of gravity" (PDF). International Journal of Modern Physics A. 20 (11): 2341–2345. arXiv:gr-qc/0410055. Bibcode:2005IJMPA..20.2341H. doi:10.1142/S0217751X05024602. Retrieved 15 August 2020.
27. Hossenfelder, S. (15 August 2008). "A Bi-Metric Theory with Exchange Symmetry". Physical Review D. 78 (4): 044015. arXiv:0807.2838. Bibcode:2008PhRvD..78d4015H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044015.
28. Hossenfelder, Sabine (2018). "Antigravitation. Summary of the 17th International Conference on Supersymmetry and the Unification of Fundamental Interactions" (PDF). American Institute of Physics. arXiv:0909.3456. doi:10.1063/1.3327545. Retrieved 15 August 2020.
29. Geoffrey A. Landis. "Negative Mass in Contemporary Physics and its Application to Propulsion". www.ntrs.nasa.gov.
30. Weinberg, Steven (2005). "Relativistic Quantum Mechanics: Space Inversion and Time-Reversal" (PDF). The Quantum Theory of Fields. 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press. pp. 75–76. ISBN 9780521670531.
31. Debergh, N.; Petit, J.-P.; D'Agostini, G. (November 2018). "On evidence for negative energies and masses in the Dirac equation through a unitary time-reversal operator". Journal of Physics: Communications. 2 (11): 115012. arXiv:1809.05046. Bibcode:2018JPhCo...2k5012D. doi:10.1088/2399-6528/aaedcc.
32. Souriau, J.-M. (1970). Structure des Systèmes Dynamiques [Structure of Dynamic Systems] (in French). Paris: Dunod. p. 199. ISSN 0750-2435.
33. Souriau, J.-M. (1997). "A mechanistic description of elementary particles: Inversions of space and time" (PDF). Structure of Dynamical Systems. Boston: Birkhäuser. pp. 173–193. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0281-3_14. ISBN 978-1-4612-6692-1.
34. Sakharov, A.D. (1980). " " [Cosmological model of the Universe with a time vector inversion]. ZhETF (in Russian). 79: 689–693.
    translation in "Cosmological model of the Universe with a time vector inversion". JETP Lett. 52: 349–351. 1980.
35. Barbour, Julian; Koslowski, Tim; Mercati, Flavio (2014). "Identification of a Gravitational Arrow of Time". Physical Review Letters. 113 (18): 181101. arXiv:1409.0917. Bibcode:2014PhRvL.113r1101B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.181101. PMID 25396357.
36. Hossenfelder, Sabine (June 2009). Antigravitation. 17th International Conference on Supersymmetry and the Unification of Fundamental Interactions. Boston: American Institute of Physics. arXiv:0909.3456. doi:10.1063/1.3327545.
37. Amole, C.; Ashkezari, M. D.; Baquero-Ruiz, M.; Bertsche, W.; Butler, E.; Capra, A.; Cesar, C. L.; Charlton, M.; Eriksson, S.; Fajans, J.; Friesen, T.; Fujiwara, M. C.; Gill, D. R.; Gutierrez, A.; Hangst, J. S.; Hardy, W. N.; Hayden, M. E.; Isaac, C. A.; Jonsell, S.; Kurchaninov, L.; Little, A.; Madsen, N.; McKenna, J. T. K.; Menary, S.; Napoli, S. C.; Nolan, P.; Olin, A.; Pusa, P.; Rasmussen, C. Ø; et al. (2013). "Description and first application of a new technique to measure the gravitational mass of antihydrogen". Nature Communications. 4: 1785. Bibcode:2013NatCo...4E1785A. doi:10.1038/ncomms2787. PMC 3644108. PMID 23653197.
38. "Physicists observe 'negative mass'". BBC News. 19 April 2017. Retrieved 20 April 2017.
39. Khamehchi, M. A.; Hossain, Khalid; Mossman, M. E.; Zhang, Yongping; Busch, Th.; Forbes, Michael Mcneil; Engels, P. (2017). "Negative-Mass Hydrodynamics in a Spin-Orbit–coupled Bose–Einstein Condensate". Physical Review Letters. 118 (15): 155301. arXiv:1612.04055. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.118o5301K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.155301. PMID 28452531.
40. Ashcroft, N. W.; Mermin, N. D. (1976). Solid State Physics. Philadelphia: Saunders College. pp. 227–228.
41. Cselyuszka, Norbert; Sečujski, Milan; Crnojević-Bengin, Vesna (2015). "Novel negative mass density resonant metamaterial unit cell". Physics Letters A. 379 (1–2): 33. Bibcode:2015PhLA..379...33C. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2014.10.036.
42. Smolyaninov, Igor I.; Smolyaninova, Vera N. (2014). "Is There a Metamaterial Route to High Temperature Superconductivity?". Advances in Condensed Matter Physics. 2014: 1–6. arXiv:1311.3277. doi:10.1155/2014/479635.
43. Dirac, P. A. M. (1928). "The Quantum Theory of the Electron". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 117 (778): 610–624. Bibcode:1928RSPSA.117..610D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1928.0023.
44. Morris, Michael S.; Thorne, Kip S.; Yurtsever, Ulvi (1988). "Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition" (PDF). Physical Review Letters. 61 (13): 1446–1449. Bibcode:1988PhRvL..61.1446M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1446. PMID 10038800.
45. Cramer, John G.; Forward, Robert L.; Morris, Michael S.; Visser, Matt; Benford, Gregory; Landis, Geoffrey A. (1995). "Natural wormholes as gravitational lenses". Physical Review D. 51 (6): 3117. arXiv:astro-ph/9409051. Bibcode:1995PhRvD..51.3117C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.3117. PMID 10018782.
46. Hawking, Stephen (2002). The Future of Spacetime. W. W. Norton. pp. 96. ISBN 978-0-393-02022-9.
47. Wang, Z.Y, Wang P.Y, Xu Y.R. (2011). "Crucial experiment to resolve Abraham–Minkowski Controversy". Optik. 122 (22): 1994–1996. arXiv:1103.3559. Bibcode:2011Optik.122.1994W. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2010.12.018.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
48. Wang, Z.Y. (2016). "Modern Theory for Electromagnetic Metamaterials". Plasmonics. 11 (2): 503–508. doi:10.1007/s11468-015-0071-7.
49. Veselago, V. G. (1968). "The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative values of permittivity and permeability". Soviet Physics Uspekhi. 10 (4): 509–514. Bibcode:1968SvPhU..10..509V. doi:10.1070/PU1968v010n04ABEH003699.
50. Caldwell, R. R. (2002). "A phantom menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state". Physics Letters B. 545 (1–2): 23–29. arXiv:astro-ph/9908168. Bibcode:2002PhLB..545...23C. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02589-3.

External links

• Physics Lecture: Negative Mass on YouTube
• Negative mass, Dark matter, Dark Energy, Bullet Cluster, Antigravity-1 on YouTube
• Argument to produce negative mass with known theory