Alcubierre drive

The Alcubierre drive, Alcubierre warp drive, or Alcubierre metric (referring to metric tensor) is a speculative idea based on a solution of Einstein's field equations in general relativity as proposed by theoretical physicist Miguel Alcubierre, by which a spacecraft could achieve apparent faster-than-light travel if a configurable energy-density field lower than that of vacuum (that is, negative mass) could be created.[1][2]

Two-dimensional visualization of an Alcubierre drive, showing the opposing regions of expanding and contracting spacetime that displace the central region

Rather than exceeding the speed of light within a local reference frame, a spacecraft would traverse distances by contracting space in front of it and expanding space behind it, resulting in effective faster-than-light travel. Objects cannot accelerate to the speed of light within normal spacetime; instead, the Alcubierre drive shifts space around an object so that the object would arrive at its destination faster than light would in normal space without breaking any physical laws.[3]

Although the metric proposed by Alcubierre is consistent with the Einstein field equations, construction of such a drive is not necessarily possible. The proposed mechanism of the Alcubierre drive implies a negative energy density and therefore requires exotic matter. So if exotic matter with the correct properties cannot exist, then the drive could not be constructed. At the close of his original article,[4] however, Alcubierre argued (following an argument developed by physicists analyzing traversable wormholes[5][6]) that the Casimir vacuum between parallel plates could fulfill the negative-energy requirement for the Alcubierre drive.

Another possible issue is that, although the Alcubierre metric is consistent with Einstein's equations, general relativity does not incorporate quantum mechanics. Some physicists have presented arguments to suggest that a theory of quantum gravity (which would incorporate both theories) would eliminate those solutions in general relativity that allow for backwards time travel (see the chronology protection conjecture) and thus make the Alcubierre drive invalid.

History

In 1994, Miguel Alcubierre proposed a method for changing the geometry of space by creating a wave that would cause the fabric of space ahead of a spacecraft to contract and the space behind it to expand.[4][1][2] The ship would then ride this wave inside a region of flat space, known as a warp bubble, and would not move within this bubble but instead be carried along as the region itself moves due to the actions of the drive. It was thought to use too much negative energy until Harold Sonny White[7][8] showed that the amount of energy required could be reduced if the warp bubble’s wall was thicker. Others have made other refinements which are summarised below.

Alcubierre metric

The Alcubierre metric defines the warp-drive spacetime. It is a Lorentzian manifold that, if interpreted in the context of general relativity, allows a warp bubble to appear in previously flat spacetime and move away effectively faster than lightspeed. The interior of the bubble is an inertial reference frame and inhabitants experience no proper acceleration. This method of transport does not involve objects in motion at speeds faster than light with respect to the contents of the warp bubble; that is, a light beam within the warp bubble would still always move faster than the ship. Because objects within the bubble are not moving (locally) faster than light, the mathematical formulation of the Alcubierre metric is consistent with the conventional claims of the laws of relativity (namely, that an object with mass cannot attain or exceed the speed of light) and conventional relativistic effects such as time dilation would not apply as they would with conventional motion at near-light speeds.

The Alcubierre drive, however, remains a hypothetical concept with seemingly difficult problems, though the amount of energy required is no longer thought to be unobtainably large.[9]

Mathematics

Using the ADM formalism of general relativity, the spacetime is described by a foliation of space-like hypersurfaces of constant coordinate time t, with the metric taking the following general form:

where

  • α is the lapse function that gives the interval of proper time between nearby hypersurfaces,
  • βi is the shift vector that relates the spatial coordinate systems on different hypersurfaces,
  • γij is a positive-definite metric on each of the hypersurfaces.

The particular form that Alcubierre studied[4] is defined by:

where

with arbitrary parameters R > 0 and σ > 0. Alcubierre's specific form of the metric can thus be written

With this particular form of the metric, it can be shown that the energy density measured by observers whose 4-velocity is normal to the hypersurfaces is given by

where g is the determinant of the metric tensor.

Thus, because the energy density is negative, one needs exotic matter to travel faster than the speed of light.[4] The existence of exotic matter is not theoretically ruled out; however, generating and sustaining enough exotic matter to perform feats such as faster-than-light travel (and also to keep open the "throat" of a wormhole) is thought to be impractical. According to writer Robert Low, within the context of general relativity it is impossible to construct a warp drive in the absence of exotic matter.[10]

Connection to dark energy and dark matter
See also: Negative mass

The astrophysicist Jamie Farnes from the University of Oxford has proposed a theory that unifies dark energy and dark matter into a single dark fluid, and which can be tested by new scientific instruments in circa 2030.[11] Farnes found that Albert Einstein had explored the idea of gravitationally repulsive negative masses while developing the equations of general relativity, an idea which leads to a "beautiful" hypothesis where the cosmos has equal amounts of positive and negative qualities. Farnes' theory relies on negative masses that behave identically to the physics of the Alcubierre drive, providing a natural solution for the current "crisis in cosmology" due to a time-variable Hubble parameter.[12]

As Farnes' theory allows a positive mass (i.e. a ship) to reach a speed equal to the speed of light, it has been dubbed "controversial".[13] If the theory is correct, which is highly debated, it would explain dark energy, dark matter, allow closed timelike curves (see time travel), and suggest that an Alcubierre drive is physically possible with exotic matter.[14]

Physics

With regard to certain specific effects of special relativity, such as Lorentz contraction and time dilation, the Alcubierre metric has some apparently peculiar aspects. In particular, Alcubierre has shown that a ship using an Alcubierre drive travels on a free-fall geodesic even while the warp bubble is accelerating: its crew would be in free fall while accelerating without experiencing accelerational g-forces. Enormous tidal forces, however, would be present near the edges of the flat-space volume because of the large space curvature there, but suitable specification of the metric would keep them very small within the volume occupied by the ship.[4]

The original warp-drive metric and simple variants of it happen to have the ADM form, which is often used in discussing the initial-value formulation of general relativity. This might explain the widespread misconception that this spacetime is a solution of the field equation of general relativity. Metrics in ADM form are adapted to a certain family of inertial observers, but these observers are not really physically distinguished from other such families. Alcubierre interpreted his "warp bubble" in terms of a contraction of space ahead of the bubble and an expansion behind, but this interpretation could be misleading,[15] since the contraction and expansion actually refer to the relative motion of nearby members of the family of ADM observers.

In general relativity, one often first specifies a plausible distribution of matter and energy, and then finds the geometry of the spacetime associated with it; but it is also possible to run the Einstein field equations in the other direction, first specifying a metric and then finding the energy–momentum tensor associated with it, and this is what Alcubierre did in building his metric. This practice means that the solution can violate various energy conditions and require exotic matter. The need for exotic matter raises questions about whether one can distribute the matter in an initial spacetime that lacks a warp bubble in such a way that the bubble is created at a later time, although some physicists have proposed models of dynamical warp-drive spacetimes in which a warp bubble is formed in a previously flat space.[16] Moreover, according to Serguei Krasnikov,[17] generating a bubble in a previously flat space for a one-way FTL trip requires forcing the exotic matter to move at local faster-than-light speeds, something that would require the existence of tachyons, although Krasnikov also notes that when the spacetime is not flat from the outset, a similar result could be achieved without tachyons by placing in advance some devices along the travel path and programming them to come into operation at preassigned moments and to operate in a preassigned manner. Some suggested methods avoid the problem of tachyonic motion, but would probably generate a naked singularity at the front of the bubble.[18][19] Allen Everett and Thomas Roman comment on Krasnikov's finding (Krasnikov tube):

[The finding] does not mean that Alcubierre bubbles, if it were possible to create them, could not be used as a means of superluminal travel. It only means that the actions required to change the metric and create the bubble must be taken beforehand by some observer whose forward light cone contains the entire trajectory of the bubble.[20]

For example, if one wanted to travel to Deneb (2,600 light years away) and arrive less than 2,600 years in the future according to external clocks, it would be required that someone had already begun work on warping the space from Earth to Deneb at least 2,600 years ago:

A spaceship appropriately located with respect to the bubble trajectory could then choose to enter the bubble, rather like a passenger catching a passing trolley car, and thus make the superluminal journey ... as Krasnikov points out, causality considerations do not prevent the crew of a spaceship from arranging, by their own actions, to complete a round trip from Earth to a distant star and back in an arbitrarily short time, as measured by clocks on Earth, by altering the metric along the path of their outbound trip.[20]

In conformal gravity

Within the framework of conformal gravity, an extension of general relativity in which the angles of spacetime are locally preserved, the Alcubierre metric does not violate the weak energy condition for particular spacetime shapes, and hence faster-than-light travel would not require exotic matter.[21]

Difficulties

The metric of this form has significant difficulties because all known warp-drive spacetime theories violate various energy conditions.[22] Nevertheless, an Alcubierre-type warp drive might be realized by exploiting certain experimentally verified quantum phenomena, such as the Casimir effect, that lead to stress–energy tensors that also violate the energy conditions, such as negative mass–energy, when described in the context of the quantum field theories.[23][24]

Mass–energy requirement

If certain quantum inequalities conjectured by Ford and Roman hold,[25] the energy requirements for some warp drives may be unfeasibly large as well as negative. For example, the energy equivalent of −1064 kg might be required[26] to transport a small spaceship across the Milky Way—an amount orders of magnitude greater than the estimated mass of the observable universe. Counterarguments to these apparent problems have also been offered.[3]

Chris Van den Broeck of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven in Belgium, in 1999, tried to address the potential issues.[27] By contracting the 3+1-dimensional surface area of the bubble being transported by the drive, while at the same time expanding the three-dimensional volume contained inside, Van den Broeck was able to reduce the total energy needed to transport small atoms to less than three solar masses. Later, by slightly modifying the Van den Broeck metric, Serguei Krasnikov reduced the necessary total amount of negative mass to a few milligrams.[3][22] Van den Broeck detailed this by saying that the total energy can be reduced dramatically by keeping the surface area of the warp bubble itself microscopically small, while at the same time expanding the spatial volume inside the bubble. However, Van den Broeck concludes that the energy densities required are still unachievable, as are the small size (a few orders of magnitude above the Planck scale) of the spacetime structures needed.[18]

In 2012, physicist Harold White and collaborators announced that modifying the geometry of exotic matter could reduce the mass–energy requirements for a macroscopic space ship from the equivalent of the planet Jupiter to that of the Voyager 1 spacecraft (c. 700 kg)[9] or less,[28] and stated their intent to perform small-scale experiments in constructing warp fields.[9] White proposed to thicken the extremely thin wall of the warp bubble, so the energy is focused in a larger volume, but the overall peak energy density is actually smaller. In a flat 2D representation, the ring of positive and negative energy, initially very thin, becomes a larger, fuzzy donut shape. However, as this less energetic warp bubble also thickens toward the interior region, it leaves less flat space to house the spacecraft, which has to be smaller.[29] Furthermore, if the intensity of the space warp can be oscillated over time, the energy required is reduced even more.[9] According to White, a modified Michelson–Morley interferometer could test the idea: one of the legs of the interferometer would appear to have a slightly different length when the test devices were energised.[28]

Placement of matter

Krasnikov proposed that if tachyonic matter cannot be found or used, then a solution might be to arrange for masses along the path of the vessel to be set in motion in such a way that the required field was produced. But in this case, the Alcubierre drive vessel can only travel routes that, like a railroad, have first been equipped with the necessary infrastructure. The pilot inside the bubble is causally disconnected with its walls and cannot carry out any action outside the bubble: the bubble cannot be used for the first trip to a distant star because the pilot cannot place infrastructure ahead of the bubble while "in transit". For example, travelling to Vega (which is 25 light-years from Earth) requires arranging everything so that the bubble moving toward Vega with a superluminal velocity would appear; such arrangements will always take more than 25 years.[17]

Coule has argued that schemes, such as the one proposed by Alcubierre, are infeasible because matter placed en route of the intended path of a craft must be placed at superluminal speed—that constructing an Alcubierre drive requires an Alcubierre drive even if the metric that allows it is physically meaningful. Coule further argues that an analogous objection will apply to any proposed method of constructing an Alcubierre drive.[19]

Survivability inside the bubble

An article by José Natário (2002) argues that crew members could not control, steer or stop the ship in its warp bubble because the ship could not send signals to the front of the bubble (the Horizon problem).[30] Fernando Loup in 2013[31] argued that the Horizon problem could be overcome in the Natário warp drive, and thus a causally-connected and therefore controllable warp bubble could be established by crew members sending information forward via micro-warp bubbles of the nature argued for by Gauthier, Gravel, and Melanson,[32][33] drawing on previous work by Pfenning and Ford.[34]

A 2009 article by Carlos Barceló, Stefano Finazzi, and Stefano Liberati uses quantum theory to argue that the Alcubierre drive at faster-than-light velocities is impossible mostly because extremely high temperatures caused by Hawking radiation would destroy anything inside the bubble at superluminal velocities and destabilize the bubble itself; the article also argues that these problems are absent if the bubble velocity is subluminal, although the drive still requires exotic matter.[16]

Damaging effect on destination

Brendan McMonigal, Geraint F. Lewis, and Philip O'Byrne have argued that were an Alcubierre-driven ship to decelerate from superluminal speed, the particles that its bubble had gathered in transit would be released in energetic outbursts akin to the infinitely-blueshifted radiation hypothesized to occur at the inner event horizon of a Kerr black hole; forward-facing particles would thereby be energetic enough to destroy anything at the destination directly in front of the ship.[35][36]

Wall thickness

The amount of negative energy required for such a propulsion is not yet known. Pfenning and Allen Everett of Tufts hold that a warp bubble traveling at 10-times the speed of light must have a wall thickness of no more than 10−32 meters—close to the limiting Planck length, 1.6 × 10−35 meters.[37] In Alcubierre's original calculations, a bubble macroscopically large enough to enclose a ship of 200 meters would require a total amount of exotic matter greater than the mass of the observable universe, and straining the exotic matter to an extremely thin band of 10−32 meters is considered impractical. Similar constraints apply to Krasnikov's superluminal subway. Chris Van den Broeck recently constructed a modification of Alcubierre's model that requires much less exotic matter but places the ship in a curved space-time "bottle" whose neck is about 10−32 meters.[18]

Causality violation and semiclassical instability

Calculations by physicist Allen Everett show that warp bubbles could be used to create closed timelike curves in general relativity, meaning that the theory predicts that they could be used for backwards time travel.[38] While it is possible that the fundamental laws of physics might allow closed timelike curves, the chronology protection conjecture hypothesizes that in all cases where the classical theory of general relativity allows them, quantum effects would intervene to eliminate the possibility, making these spacetimes impossible to realize. A possible type of effect that would accomplish this is a buildup of vacuum fluctuations on the border of the region of spacetime where time travel would first become possible, causing the energy density to become high enough to destroy the system that would otherwise become a time machine. Some results in semiclassical gravity appear to support the conjecture, including a calculation dealing specifically with quantum effects in warp-drive spacetimes that suggested that warp bubbles would be semiclassically unstable,[16][39] but ultimately the conjecture can only be decided by a full theory of quantum gravity.[40]

Alcubierre briefly discusses some of these issues in a series of lecture slides posted online,[41] where he writes: "beware: in relativity, any method to travel faster than light can in principle be used to travel back in time (a time machine)". In the next slide he brings up the chronology protection conjecture and writes: "The conjecture has not been proven (it wouldn’t be a conjecture if it had), but there are good arguments in its favor based on quantum field theory. The conjecture does not prohibit faster-than-light travel. It just states that if a method to travel faster than light exists, and one tries to use it to build a time machine, something will go wrong: the energy accumulated will explode, or it will create a black hole."

Experiments
Main article: White–Juday warp-field interferometer

In 2012, a NASA laboratory announced that they had constructed an interferometer that they claim will detect the spatial distortions produced by the expanding and contracting spacetime of the Alcubierre metric. The work has been described in Warp Field Mechanics 101, a NASA paper by Harold Sonny White.[7][8] Alcubierre has expressed skepticism about the experiment, saying: "from my understanding there is no way it can be done, probably not for centuries if at all".[42][43]

Relation to Star Trek warp drive

The Star Trek television series and films used the term "warp drive" to describe their method of faster-than-light travel. Neither the Alcubierre theory, nor anything similar, existed when the series was conceived—the term "warp drive" and general concept originated with John W. Campbell's 1931 science fiction novel Islands of Space.[44] Alcubierre stated in an email to William Shatner that his theory was directly inspired by the term used in the show[45] and cites the "'warp drive' of science fiction" in his 1994 article.[46]

gollark: You can read out a complex number...
gollark: What if the number of people in front of you can be counted, but does not have a finite length?
gollark: What if there are too many to accurately count fast?
gollark: I don't think *anyone* says it unironically in the UK.
gollark: UTTER gallium (element).

See also

Notes
  1. Agnew, J. (16 August 2019). "An Examination of Warp Theory and Technology to Determine the State of the Art and Feasibility". AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum and Exposition. doi:10.2514/6.2019-4288. ISBN 978-1-62410-590-6.
  2. Williams, Matt (1 March 2020). "Scientists Are Starting to Take Warp Drives Seriously, Especially This One Concept". ScieneAlert.com. Retrieved 2 March 2020.
  3. Krasnikov, S. (2003). "The quantum inequalities do not forbid spacetime shortcuts". Physical Review D. 67 (10): 104013. arXiv:gr-qc/0207057. Bibcode:2003PhRvD..67j4013K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104013.
  4. Alcubierre, Miguel (1994). "The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 11 (5): L73–L77. arXiv:gr-qc/0009013. Bibcode:1994CQGra..11L..73A. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/5/001.
  5. Thorne, Kip; Michael Morris; Ulvi Yurtsever (1988). "Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition" (PDF). Physical Review Letters. 61 (13): 1446–1449. Bibcode:1988PhRvL..61.1446M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1446. PMID 10038800. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 February 2011.
  6. Cramer, John G. (15 April 1996). "The Alcubierre Warp Drive". Archived from the original on 21 September 2012. Alcubierre, following the lead of wormhole theorists, argues that quantum field theory permits the existence of regions of negative energy density under special circumstances, and cites the Casimir effect as an example.
  7. "Roundup" (PDF). Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center. July 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 March 2014. Retrieved 1 October 2013.
  8. Dr. Harold "Sonny" White (30 September 2011). "Warp Field Mechanics 101" (PDF). NASA Johnson Space Center. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 28 January 2013.
  9. Moskowitz, Clara (17 September 2012). "Warp Drive May Be More Feasible Than Thought, Scientists Say". Space.com. Archived from the original on 13 January 2013. Retrieved 10 January 2013.
  10. Low, Robert J. (1999). "Speed Limits in General Relativity". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 16 (2): 543–549. arXiv:gr-qc/9812067. Bibcode:1999CQGra..16..543L. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/16/2/016.
  11. University of Oxford (5 December 2018). "Bringing balance to the universe: New theory could explain missing 95 percent of the cosmos". EurekAlert!. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
  12. Farnes, J.S. (2018). "A Unifying Theory of Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Negative Masses and Matter Creation within a Modified ΛCDM Framework". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 620: A92. arXiv:1712.07962. Bibcode:2018A&A...620A..92F. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832898.
  13. Big Think (29 October 2019). "Astrophysicist claims "dark fluid" fills the missing 95% of the Universe". Big Think. Retrieved 18 January 2020.
  14. Socas-Navarro, H. (30 May 2019). "Can a negative-mass cosmology explain dark matter and dark energy?". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 626: A5. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935317. ISSN 0004-6361.
  15. Natario, Jose (2002). "Warp drive with zero expansion". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 19 (6): 1157–1166. arXiv:gr-qc/0110086. Bibcode:2002CQGra..19.1157N. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/6/308.
  16. Finazzi, Stefano; Liberati, Stefano; Barceló, Carlos (2009). "Semiclassical instability of dynamical warp drives". Physical Review D. 79 (12): 124017. arXiv:0904.0141. Bibcode:2009PhRvD..79l4017F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.124017.
  17. Krasnikov, S. (1998). "Hyper-fast travel in general relativity". Physical Review D. 57 (8): 4760–4766. arXiv:gr-qc/9511068. Bibcode:1998PhRvD..57.4760K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.4760.
  18. Van den Broeck, Chris (1999). "On the (im)possibility of warp bubbles". arXiv:gr-qc/9906050.
  19. Coule, D. H. (1998). "No warp drive" (PDF). Classical and Quantum Gravity. 15 (8): 2523–2537. Bibcode:1998CQGra..15.2523C. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/8/026. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 June 2007.
  20. Everett, Allen; Roman, Thomas (1997). "A Superluminal Subway: The Krasnikov Tube". Physical Review D. 56 (4): 2100–2108. arXiv:gr-qc/9702049. Bibcode:1997PhRvD..56.2100E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.2100.
  21. Varieschi, G. U. & Burstein, Z. (2013). Conformal gravity and the Alcubierre warp drive metric Archived 8 November 2014 at the Wayback Machine. ISRN Astronomy and Astrophysics.
  22. Van den Broeck, Christian (2000). "Alcubierre's warp drive: Problems and prospects". AIP Conference Proceedings. 504: 1105–1110. Bibcode:2000AIPC..504.1105V. doi:10.1063/1.1290913.
  23. Krasnikov (2003), p.13, "Moreover, by analogy with the Casimir effect, it is reasonable to assume that ρ in such a wormhole will be large (∼L−4), which would relieve one of having to seek additional sources of exotic matter."
  24. Ford and Roman (1995), p.5, "...the Casimir effect may be useful as an illustration. Here one has a constant negative energy density..."
  25. Ford, L. H.; Roman, T. A. (1996). "Quantum field theory constrains traversable wormhole geometries". Physical Review D. 53 (10): 5496–5507. arXiv:gr-qc/9510071. Bibcode:1996PhRvD..53.5496F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5496. PMID 10019835.
  26. Pfenning, Michael J.; Ford, L. H. (1997). "The unphysical nature of 'Warp Drive'". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 14 (7): 1743–1751. arXiv:gr-qc/9702026. Bibcode:1997CQGra..14.1743P. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/7/011.
  27. Van den Broeck, Chris (1999). "A 'warp drive' with more reasonable total energy requirements". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 16 (12): 3973–3979. arXiv:gr-qc/9905084. Bibcode:1999CQGra..16.3973V. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/16/12/314.
  28. Dvorsky, George (26 November 2012). "How NASA might build its very first warp drive". io9. Archived from the original on 10 January 2013. Retrieved 10 January 2013.
  29. White, Harold. "Nasa Physicist". Archived from the original on 8 April 2016.
  30. Natário, José (2002). "Warp drive with zero expansion". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 19 (6): 1157–1165. arXiv:gr-qc/0110086. Bibcode:2002CQGra..19.1157N. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/6/308.
  31. Loup, Fernando. On the Divergence of the Negative Energy Density Equation in both Alcubierre and Natario Warp Drive Spacetimes: No Divergence At All. OCLC 859725041.
  32. Gauthier, C.; Gravel, P.; Melanson, J. (10 August 2002). "New lower bounds for warp drive energy". International Journal of Modern Physics A. 17 (20): 2761. Bibcode:2002IJMPA..17.2761G. doi:10.1142/s0217751x02011886. ISSN 0217-751X.
  33. Gauthier, C.; Gravel, P.; Melanson, J. (2003). "New lower bounds for the energy of large or micro-warp drive bubbles". Gravitation and Cosmology. 9 (4): 301–306. Bibcode:2003GrCo....9..301G. ISSN 0202-2893.
  34. Pfenning, M J; Ford, L H (1 July 1997). "The unphysical nature of 'warp drive'". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 14 (7): 1743–1751. arXiv:gr-qc/9702026. Bibcode:1997CQGra..14.1743P. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/7/011. ISSN 0264-9381.
  35. Major, Jason (29 February 2012). "Warp Drives May Come With a Killer Downside". Universe Today. Archived from the original on 10 December 2012.
  36. Brendan McMonigal, Geraint F. Lewis, and Philip O'Byrne The Alcubierre Warp Drive: On the Matter of Matter Archived 5 December 2012 at the Wayback Machine – see conclusion: "These results suggest that any ship using an Alcubierre warp drive carrying people would need shielding to protect them from potential dangerously blueshifted particles during the journey, and any people at the destination would be gamma ray and high energy particle blasted into oblivion due to the extreme blueshifts for P+ region particles."
  37. Michael John Pfenning (1998). "Quantum Inequality Restrictions on Negative Energy Densities in Curved Spacetimes". p. 1692. arXiv:gr-qc/9805037.
  38. Everett, Allen E. (15 June 1996). "Warp drive and causality" (PDF). Physical Review D. 53 (12): 7365–7368. Bibcode:1996PhRvD..53.7365E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.53.7365. PMID 10020029. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 October 2013. Retrieved 24 July 2013.
  39. Barceló, Carlos; Finazzi, Stefano; Liberati, Stefano (2010). "On the impossibility of superluminal travel: the warp drive lesson". arXiv:1001.4960 [gr-qc].
  40. Visser, Matt (December 1997). "The reliability horizon for semi-classical quantum gravity: Metric fluctuations are often more important than back-reaction". Physics Letters B. 415 (1): 8–14. arXiv:gr-qc/9702041. Bibcode:1997PhLB..415....8V. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01226-4.
  41. "Faster than light" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 March 2016. Retrieved 25 January 2017.
  42. Miguel Alcubierre's Twitter feed, 29 July 2013 Archived 9 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine.
  43. Dr. Harold "Sonny" White (17 August 2013). "2013 Starship Congress: Warp Field Physics, an Update". Icarus Interstellar. Archived from the original on 20 November 2013. Retrieved 17 August 2013.
  44. J. Gardiner, "Warp Drive - From Imagination to Reality", Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, vol. 61, p. 353-357 (2008)
  45. Shapiro, Alan. "The Physics of Warp Drive". Archived from the original on 24 April 2013. Retrieved 2 June 2013.
  46. Alcubierre, Miguel (1994). "The warp drive: Hyper-fast travel within general relativity". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 11 (5): L73–L77. arXiv:gr-qc/0009013. Bibcode:1994CQGra..11L..73A. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/5/001.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.