Mount Union, Iowa

Mount Union is a city in Henry County, Iowa, United States. The population was 107 at the 2010 census. In a November 2016 referendum, the city's residents voted 32 to 31 to unincorporate.[4][5]

Mount Union, Iowa
Location of Mount Union, Iowa
Coordinates: 41°3′27″N 91°23′27″W
Country United States
State Iowa
CountyHenry
Area
  Total0.11 sq mi (0.28 km2)
  Land0.11 sq mi (0.28 km2)
  Water0 sq mi (0 km2)
Elevation
728 ft (222 m)
Population
  Total107
  Estimate 
(2016)[3]
106
  Density973/sq mi (375.6/km2)
Time zoneUTC-6 (Central (CST))
  Summer (DST)UTC-5 (CDT)
ZIP code
52644
Area code(s)319
FIPS code19-54795
GNIS feature ID0459342

Geography

Mount Union is located at 41°3′27″N 91°23′27″W (41.057503, -91.390758).[6]

According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 0.11 square miles (0.28 km2), all land.[1]

Demographics

Historical populations
YearPop.±%
188044    
1910195+343.2%
1920225+15.4%
1930167−25.8%
1940186+11.4%
1950167−10.2%
1960176+5.4%
1970173−1.7%
1980145−16.2%
1990140−3.4%
2000132−5.7%
2010107−18.9%
2016106−0.9%
Source:"U.S. Census website". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2020-03-29. and Iowa Data Center
Source:
U.S. Decennial Census[7]

2010 census

As of the census[2] of 2010, there were 107 people, 43 households, and 27 families living in the city. The population density was 972.7 inhabitants per square mile (375.6/km2). There were 54 housing units at an average density of 490.9 per square mile (189.5/km2). The racial makeup of the city was 100.0% White. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 3.7% of the population.

There were 43 households, of which 37.2% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 51.2% were married couples living together, 7.0% had a female householder with no husband present, 4.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 37.2% were non-families. 32.6% of all households were made up of individuals, and 9.4% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.49 and the average family size was 3.26.

The median age in the city was 35.9 years. 32.7% of residents were under the age of 18; 1.7% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 22.5% were from 25 to 44; 29.9% were from 45 to 64; and 13.1% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the city was 48.6% male and 51.4% female.

2000 census

As of the census[8] of 2000, there were 132 people, 51 households, and 39 families living in the city. The population density was 1,188.4 people per square mile (463.3/km2). There were 57 housing units at an average density of 513.2 per square mile (200.1/km2). The racial makeup of the city was 96.97% White, and 3.03% from two or more races.

There were 51 households, out of which 43.1% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 68.6% were married couples living together, and 23.5% were non-families. 21.6% of all households were made up of individuals, and 3.9% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.59 and the average family size was 2.97.

In the city, the population was spread out, with 30.3% under the age of 18, 3.0% from 18 to 24, 37.9% from 25 to 44, 18.2% from 45 to 64, and 10.6% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 34 years. For every 100 females, there were 88.6 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 104.4 males.

The median income for a household in the city was $27,500, and the median income for a family was $31,250. Males had a median income of $30,714 versus $22,500 for females. The per capita income for the city was $12,735. There were 20.0% of families and 21.6% of the population living below the poverty line, including 6.8% of under eighteens and 25.0% of those over 64.

Notable person

gollark: It does seem vaguely worrying to me that people seem to treat it/other stuff being illegal as the default, natural state of things.
gollark: Probably. Governments just love illegalizing things for bad reasons.
gollark: Banning alcohol was tried and failed because of that. Banning weed... happened, seemingly hasn't prevented people getting/using it anyway (but resulted in loads of people pointlessly going to prison), and is beginning to be reverted.
gollark: Well, yes. I don't think it's a good reason, but I think it's *why*.
gollark: It's not a justification. It's a reason.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.