Michele Dancelli

Michele Dancelli (born 8 May 1942) is an Italian former road racing cyclist. His main victories include one Milan–San Remo (1970), the 1966 Flèche Wallonne, three editions of the Giro dell'Appennino (1965–1967), two Trofeo Laigueglia (1968 and 1970). He also won 11 stages in total in the Giro d'Italia and one stage in the 1969 Tour de France.[1][2]

Michele Dancelli
Personal information
Full nameMichele Dancelli
Born (1942-05-08) 8 May 1942
Castenedolo, Italy
Team information
Current teamRetired
DisciplineRoad
RoleRider
Major wins
Milan–San Remo (1970)

Major results

1963
amateur road race champion
1964
Col San Martino
Gran Premio Industria e Commercio di Prato
Corsa Coppi
1965
Auch
Giro del Veneto
Giro dell'Appennino
GP de Cannes
Gran Premio Industria e Commercio di Prato
Italian National Road Race Championship
Giro di Campania
GP Montelupo
Coppa Placci
Giro dell'Emilia
1966
Chieti
Giro del Lazio
Giro del Veneto
Giro dell'Appennino
Giro della Provincia di Reggio Calabria
Italian National Road Race Championship
La Flèche Wallonne
1967
Carciano
Coppa Sabatini
Giro dell'Appennino
Giro della Provincia di Reggio Calabria
Gran Premio Industria e Commercio di Prato
Larciano
Scorze
Giro d'Italia:
Winner stages 3 and 15
Giro dell'Emilia
Corsa Coppi
1968
Giro della Provincia di Reggio Calabria
Trofeo Laigueglia
Maggiore
Paris–Luxembourg (with Marino Basso)
1969
GP Cemab
San Venanzio di Galliera
Scandiano
Giro d'Italia:
Winner stage 9
Tour de France:
Winner stage 8B
Chignolo Po
1970
Giro del Lazio
Trofeo Laigueglia
Milan–San Remo
1971
Calvisano
1973
Beausoleil
gollark: I blame some sort of weird interaction between insurance companies, regulation/the government, consumers of healthcare services, and the companies involved in healthcare.
gollark: The US healthcare system is just really quite broken and there is probably not some individual there who's just going "MWAHAHAHA, my plan to increase the price of healthcare has succeeded, and I could easily make everything reasonable but I won't because I'm evil!", or one person who could decide to just make some stuff free right now without introducing some huge issues. It's a systemic issue.
gollark: Yes, they do have considerations other than minimizing short-term COVID-19 deaths, but that is sensible because other things do matter.
gollark: The US government, and large business owners and whoever else ("capitalism"), don't really want people to die in large numbers *either*, they're:- still *people*- adversely affected by said large numbers dying, because: - if lots of people die in the US compared to elsewhere, they'll look bad come reelection - most metrics people look at will also be worse off if many die and/or are ill for a while - many deaths would reduce demand for their stuff, and they might lose important workers, and more deaths means a worse recession
gollark: That is stupid on so many levels. Is it meant to be some homepathic thing, where the blood is obviously even more worserer if they dilute it?

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.