Miꞌkmaꞌki

Miꞌkmaꞌki or Miꞌgmaꞌgi is the traditional and current territories or country of the Miꞌkmaq people. It is shared by an inter-Nation forum between Miꞌkmaq First Nations and is divided into seven geographical and traditional districts, with an eighth representing Taqamkuk today. Miꞌkmaꞌki is one of the confederate countries within Wabanaki.

Miꞌkmaꞌki

Pre-contact–1867 (as a State)
Flag
Seven Districts of Miꞌkmaꞌki excluding Taqamkuk
StatusConfederated Districts of Wabanaki
CapitalMniku, Unamaꞌkik
Common languagesMiꞌkmawiꞌsimk
Demonym(s)Miꞌkmaq
GovernmentSanteꞌ Mawioꞌmi / Miꞌkmawey Mawioꞌmi
Kji Sagamaw 
 unknown-1611
Henri Membertou
 1792-1818
Francis Peck
 1818-1842
Michael Tooma
 1842-1869
Frank Tooma Jr.
Sagamaw 
Putus 
History 
 Established
Pre-contact
 Contact with John Cabot[1]
1497
 Exclusion from the Treaty of Utrecht
1713
 First Treaty with Great Britain after the Anglo–Wabanaki War
1725
1867 (as a State)
Population
 pre-1500
35,000-75,000[2]
 1500
4,500
 1750
3,000
 1900
4,000
 2016
58,763[3]
CurrencyWabanaki Wampum
Today part of Canada

Each district was autonomous, headed by a Sagamaw, who would gather alongside Wampum readers and knowledge keepers called Putus, a women's council and the Kji Sagamaw, or Grand Chief, to form the Santeꞌ or Miꞌkmawey Mawioꞌmi (Grand Council).[2] The seat of the Santeꞌ Mawioꞌmi is at Mniku in Unamaꞌkik and still functions as the capital today in the Potlotek reserve.

Following contact, Miꞌkmaꞌki was colonized by the French and British Nova Scotia colonies and their competing claims for the land. Siding with the French, the Miꞌkmaq fought alongside other Wabanaki troops during the global wars between 1688-1763. The European powers divided Miꞌkmaꞌki in the treaties of Utrecht (1715) and Paris (1763). The British claimed Miꞌkmaꞌki as their possession by conquest and the defeated Miꞌkmaq signed the Peace and Friendship Treaties to end hostilities and encourage cooperation between the Wabanaki countries and the British and ensure the survival of the Miꞌkmaq people whose numbers had dwindled to a few thousand from disease and starvation. The power held within Miꞌkmaꞌki faded further after the Confederation of Canada united the colonies and Canada passed the Indian Act, and the loss of autonomous governance.

Today, the Santeꞌ Mawioꞌmi functions solely as a spiritual and dialogue forum, with oversight held by the Government of Canada through individual Miꞌkmaq First Nations instead of Miꞌkmaꞌki and the Kji Sagamaw. The traditional lands' sovereignty has never been ceded by the Miꞌkmaq,[4] although legal arguments have been made that the Peace and Friendship treaties legitimized the takeover of the land by Britain.

Governance

Miꞌkmaq camp in Unamaꞌkik in 1857

Traditionally each district had its own independent government. Those governments were composed of a chief and a council. The council included the band chiefs, elders and other important leaders. The role of the councils was similar to those of any independent government and included to edict laws, establish a justice system, divide the territory for hunting and fishing, make war and search for peace.

The overarching Grand Council Santeꞌ Mawioꞌmi was composed of the keptinaq (captains), the district chiefs. The Grand Council also included elders, putus (historians reading the belts) and a Council of women. The Grand Council was headed by a grand chief who was one of the district chiefs, generally the Unamaꞌkik chief. Succession was hereditary. The seat of the Grand Council was generally on Unamaꞌkik (Cape Breton Island).[5]

Districts

The eight districts (names are given in the Franci-Smith orthography with the Listuguj orthography in brackets) are:

  • Epekwitk aq Piktuk (Epegwitg aq Pigtug)
  • Eskikewaꞌkik (Esgeꞌgewaꞌgi)
  • Kespek (Gespeꞌgewaꞌgi)
  • Kespukwitk (Gespugwitg)
  • Siknikt (Signigtewaꞌgi)
  • Sipekniꞌkatik (Sugapuneꞌgati)
  • Unamaꞌkik (Unamaꞌgi)
  • Ktaqamkuk (Gtaqamg).
gollark: You appear to have disclaimed all the plausible interpretations of that which I had.
gollark: I don't understand which discussion you think you are having then.
gollark: So you think that the centristic political views here just happen to be exactly the right ones for modern civilisation's situation and others don't work?
gollark: Past societies have lasted hundreds of years with entirely different ones.
gollark: Again: the "centre" as it stands now is purely an artifact of what our present political climate looks like.

See also

References

  1. "Miꞌkmaw Time Line". Cape Breton University. Retrieved 26 September 2017.
  2. McMillan, Leslie Jane (December 1996). "Miꞌkmawey Mawioꞌmi: Changing Roles of the Miꞌkmaq Grand Council From the Early Seventeenth Century to the Present" (PDF). Dalhousie University: 219. Retrieved 26 September 2017. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. Harold Franklin, McGee Jr (13 August 2008). "Miꞌkmaq". Historica Canadian. Retrieved 26 September 2017.
  4. Paul 2000, p. 160.
  5. "Miꞌkmaq". Intercontinental Cry. Retrieved 2 December 2016..
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.