Melodifestivalen 1998
Melodifestivalen 1998 was the selection for the 38th song to represent Sweden at the Eurovision Song Contest. It was the 37th time that this system of picking a song had been used. 1,141 songs were submitted to SVT for the competition. The final was broadcast on SVT2 and Sveriges Radio's P4 network. The show was watched by 2,881,000 people.
Melodifestivalen 1998 | |
---|---|
Dates | |
Final | 14 March 1998 |
Venue | Malmö Musikteater, Malmö |
Presenter(s) | Pernilla Månsson Colt, Magnus Karlsson |
Participants | |
Vote | |
Voting system | Regional juries |
Winning song | "Kärleken är" by Jill Johnson |
Results
Draw | Artist | Song | Songwriters | Points | Place |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Annika Fehling | "När en stjärna faller" | Annika Fehling | — | — |
2 | B.I.G. | "Ingen annan väg" | Peo Thyrén, Richard Evenlind, Erika Evenlind, Stefan Almqvist | 52 | 2nd |
3 | Elisabeth Melander | "Ta dej tid" | Margareta Nilsson, Gertrud Hemmel | — | — |
4 | Nanne Grönvall | "Avundsjuk" | Peter Grönvall, Nanne Grönvall | 35 | 4th |
5 | Linda Eriksson | "Bara månen får se" | Torgny Söderberg | — | — |
6 | Helena Eriksson | "Kärleken finns överallt" | Frank Ådahl | — | — |
7 | Fredrik Karlsson | "Långsamma timmar" | Fredrik Karlsson, Peter Svensson | — | — |
8 | Myrra Malmberg | "Julia" | Claes Andreasson, Torbjörn Wassenius | 38 | 3rd |
9 | Black Ingvars | "Cherie" | Stephan Berg | 34 | 5th |
10 | Jill Johnson | "Kärleken är" | Bobby Ljunggren, Håkan Almqvist, Ingela 'Pling' Forsman | 72 | 1st |
Voting
Juries
Song | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"Ingen annan väg" | 8 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 52 |
"Avundsjuk" | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 35 |
"Julia" | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 38 |
"Cherie" | 2 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 34 |
"Kärleken är" | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 72 |
gollark: You can also get these very accurate UWB position sensor things, or theoretically use ultrasound.
gollark: ANTARCTIC OBSCURITY is theoretically capable of localization if you have multiple receivers with either very accurate synchronized clocks (doubtful) or (if you don't mind noise and/or manual data gathering) signal strength readings.
gollark: RFID is generally rather short-range, so no.
gollark: Computer vision is hard, RFID tags would be easier.
gollark: Google occasionally does good things for privacy, weirdly.
See also
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.