March–April 1887 Swedish general election

Early general elections were held in Sweden in March and April 1887, having not been due until the autumn.[1] They had been called following a debate over rye tariffs, and became known as the "tariff election".[1]

Kingdom of Sweden
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Sweden

Background

Tariffs had become a major political issue in Sweden during the mid-1880s. In 1885 a campaign for tariffs to be introduced on grain was rejected by both chambers of the Riksdag. The following year the issue was debated again, and whilst the Second Chamber approved their introduction, the First Chamber rejected them. The matter was settled when a joint sitting of the two chambers rejected the initiative.[1]

In 1887 a tariff on rye was voted down 70–68 in the First Chamber, which went on to vote down all other tariffs.[1] The Second Chamber then approved the rye tariff by 111–101. With it looking as if the tariff proposal would be passed at a joint sitting, King Oscar II dissolved Parliament with the support of Prime Minister Robert Themptander, and called fresh elections.[1]

Results

An intensive election campaign led to a large increase in voter turnout; since the changes to the electoral system in 1866 turnout had always been below 25%, but for this election it was 48%.[1] Only 21.9% of the male population aged over 21 was eligible to vote.[2]

Bloc Votes % Seats
Free traders76,02558.6102
Protectionists53,69241.4112
Invalid/blank votes––
Total129,717100221
Registered voters/turnout274,733–
Source: Mackie & Rose[3]

Aftermath

Following the spring elections, some MPs attempted to delay a decision on tariffs by proposing that a commission of inquiry be set up. Although this was supported by Themptander, Parliament rejected the idea.[1]

Despite the Spring elections, the scheduled August and September elections still went ahead, resulting in another victory for the free trade bloc, albeit with a reduced majority.[1]

gollark: Laws are sometimes bad, see.
gollark: Anyway, regardless of the actual debate wrt. whether "trap" is a slur, you can *clearly* see that it is not a clear-cut issue in all cases.
gollark: Anything dealing with complex rapidly shifting vaguely political things is *not* simple and commonsensical.
gollark: See, you *can* disagree quite easily.
gollark: Ah, a pneumatic metaencabulation transducer.

References
  1. Leif Lewin (1989) Ideology and Strategy: A Century of Swedish Politics Cambridge University Press, p46
  2. Lewin, p329
  3. Thomas T Mackie & Richard Rose (1991) The International Almanac of Electoral History, Macmillan, pp404–406
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.