Malacothamnus fasciculatus

Malacothamnus fasciculatus, with the common name chaparral mallow, is a species of flowering plant in the mallow family.[1] It is found in far western North America.[2]

Malacothamnus fasciculatus
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Clade: Rosids
Order: Malvales
Family: Malvaceae
Genus: Malacothamnus
Species:
M. fasciculatus
Binomial name
Malacothamnus fasciculatus

Distribution

The plant is native to southern California and northern Baja California, where it is a common member of the chaparral and coastal sage scrub plant communities.

Description

Malacothamnus fasciculatus is a shrub with a slender, multibranched stem growing 1–5 metres (3.3–16.4 ft) in height. It is coated thinly to densely in white or brownish hairs.

The leaves are oval or rounded in shape, 2 to 11 centimeters long, and sometimes divided into lobes. The inflorescence is an elongated cluster of many pale pink flowers with petals under a centimeter long.

White flowering Malacothamnus fasciculatus var. nuttallii.

Varieties

It is a highly variable plant which is sometimes described as a spectrum of varieties, and which is sometimes hard to differentiate from other Malacothamnus species.[1]

Varieties of the species currently named include:[3]
  • Malacothamnus fasciculatus var. catalinensis — Santa Catalina Island bush-mallow; endemic to Catalina Island, one of the Channel Islands of California.[4]
  • Malacothamnus fasciculatus var. fasciculatus.
  • Malacothamnus fasciculatus var. nesioticus — Santa Cruz Island bush mallow; a rare plant endemic to Santa Cruz Island, one of the Channel Islands, on which only ~120 individual plants remain.[5] It is federally listed as an endangered species.[6]
  • Malacothamnus fasciculatus var. nuttallii — endemic to California in the Outer South Coast Ranges, and Western Transverse Ranges.[7]
Pink flowering form, in the Peninsular Ranges.
gollark: To randomly interject very late, I don't agree with your reasoning here. As far as physicists can tell, while pretty complex and hard for humans to understand, relative to some other things the universe runs on simple rules - you can probably describe the way it works in maybe a book's worth of material assuming quite a lot of mathematical background. Which is less than you might need for, say, a particularly complex modern computer system. You know what else is quite complex? Gods. They are generally portrayed as acting fairly similarly to humans (humans like modelling other things as basically-humans and writing human-centric stories), and even apart from that are clearly meant to be intelligent agents of some kind. Both of those are complicated - the human genome is something like 6GB, a good deal of which probably codes for brain things. As for other intelligent things, despite having tons of data once trained, modern machine learning things are admittedly not very complex to *describe*, but nobody knows what an architecture for general intelligence would look like.
gollark: https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/348702212110680064/896356765267025940/FB_IMG_1633757163544.jpg
gollark: https://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf
gollark: Frankly, go emit muon neutrinos.
gollark: If your study produces no result you just won't publish it, which leads to some bias.

References
  1. ITIS Report: Malacothamnus fasciculatus" (Nutt. ex Torr. & A. Gray) Greene . accessed 1.14.2014.
  2. USDA . accessed 1.14.2014.
  3. CalFlora . accessed 1.14.2014
  4. CalFlora Database: Malacothamnus fasciculatus var. catalinensis.
  5. CalFlora Database: Malacothamnus fasciculatus var. nesioticus
  6. Center for Plant Conservation
  7. CalFlora Database: Malacothamnus fasciculatus var. nuttallii.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.