Mahāvīra (mathematician)

Mahāvīra (or Mahaviracharya, "Mahavira the Teacher") was a 9th-century Jain mathematician possibly born in or close to the present day city of Mysore, in southern India.[1][2][3] He authored Gaṇitasārasan̄graha (Ganita Sara Sangraha) or the Compendium on the gist of Mathematics in 850 CE.[4] He was patronised by the Rashtrakuta king Amoghavarsha.[4] He separated astrology from mathematics. It is the earliest Indian text entirely devoted to mathematics.[5] He expounded on the same subjects on which Aryabhata and Brahmagupta contended, but he expressed them more clearly. His work is a highly syncopated approach to algebra and the emphasis in much of his text is on developing the techniques necessary to solve algebraic problems.[6] He is highly respected among Indian mathematicians, because of his establishment of terminology for concepts such as equilateral, and isosceles triangle; rhombus; circle and semicircle.[7] Mahāvīra's eminence spread throughout South India and his books proved inspirational to other mathematicians in Southern India.[8] It was translated into Telugu language by Pavuluri Mallana as Saar Sangraha Ganitam.[9]

He discovered algebraic identities like a3 = a (a + b) (a b) + b2 (a b) + b3.[3] He also found out the formula for nCr as
[n (n 1) (n 2) ... (n r + 1)] / [r (r 1) (r 2) ... 2 * 1].[10] He devised a formula which approximated the area and perimeters of ellipses and found methods to calculate the square of a number and cube roots of a number.[11] He asserted that the square root of a negative number does not exist.[12]

Rules for decomposing fractions

Mahāvīra's Gaṇita-sāra-saṅgraha gave systematic rules for expressing a fraction as the sum of unit fractions.[13] This follows the use of unit fractions in Indian mathematics in the Vedic period, and the Śulba Sūtras' giving an approximation of 2 equivalent to .[13]

In the Gaṇita-sāra-saṅgraha (GSS), the second section of the chapter on arithmetic is named kalā-savarṇa-vyavahāra (lit. "the operation of the reduction of fractions"). In this, the bhāgajāti section (verses 55–98) gives rules for the following:[13]

  • To express 1 as the sum of n unit fractions (GSS kalāsavarṇa 75, examples in 76):[13]

rūpāṃśakarāśīnāṃ rūpādyās triguṇitā harāḥ kramaśaḥ /
dvidvitryaṃśābhyastāv ādimacaramau phale rūpe //

When the result is one, the denominators of the quantities having one as numerators are [the numbers] beginning with one and multiplied by three, in order. The first and the last are multiplied by two and two-thirds [respectively].

  • To express 1 as the sum of an odd number of unit fractions (GSS kalāsavarṇa 77):[13]
  • To express a unit fraction as the sum of n other fractions with given numerators (GSS kalāsavarṇa 78, examples in 79):
  • To express any fraction as a sum of unit fractions (GSS kalāsavarṇa 80, examples in 81):[13]
Choose an integer i such that is an integer r, then write
and repeat the process for the second term, recursively. (Note that if i is always chosen to be the smallest such integer, this is identical to the greedy algorithm for Egyptian fractions.)
  • To express a unit fraction as the sum of two other unit fractions (GSS kalāsavarṇa 85, example in 86):[13]
where is to be chosen such that is an integer (for which must be a multiple of ).
  • To express a fraction as the sum of two other fractions with given numerators and (GSS kalāsavarṇa 87, example in 88):[13]
where is to be chosen such that divides

Some further rules were given in the Gaṇita-kaumudi of Nārāyaṇa in the 14th century.[13]

gollark: <@236831708354314240>```f x = unsafeCoerce```
gollark: Most boring function ever:```haskellmostBoringFunctionEver x = x```
gollark: <@319753218592866315> Can we get programming language emojicons?
gollark: If you wrap it in brackets then actually it works fine.
gollark: In what way?

See also

Notes

  1. Pingree 1970.
  2. O'Connor & Robertson 2000.
  3. Tabak 2009, p. 42.
  4. Puttaswamy 2012, p. 231.
  5. The Math Book: From Pythagoras to the 57th Dimension, 250 Milestones in the ... by Clifford A. Pickover: page 88
  6. Algebra: Sets, Symbols, and the Language of Thought by John Tabak: p.43
  7. Geometry in Ancient and Medieval India by T. A. Sarasvati Amma: page 122
  8. Hayashi 2013.
  9. Census of the Exact Sciences in Sanskrit by David Pingree: page 388
  10. Tabak 2009, p. 43.
  11. Krebs 2004, p. 132.
  12. Selin 2008, p. 1268.
  13. Kusuba 2004, pp. 497–516

References

  • Bibhutibhusan Datta and Avadhesh Narayan Singh (1962). History of Hindu Mathematics: A Source Book.
  • Pingree, David (1970). "Mahāvīra". Dictionary of Scientific Biography. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. ISBN 978-0-684-10114-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) (Available, along with many other entries from other encyclopedias for other Mahāvīra-s, online.)
  • Selin, Helaine (2008), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, Springer, ISBN 978-1-4020-4559-2
  • Hayashi, Takao (2013), "Mahavira", Encyclopædia Britannica
  • O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F. (2000), "Mahavira", MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews.
  • Tabak, John (2009), Algebra: Sets, Symbols, and the Language of Thought, Infobase Publishing, ISBN 978-0-8160-6875-3
  • Krebs, Robert E. (2004), Groundbreaking Scientific Experiments, Inventions, and Discoveries of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 978-0-313-32433-8
  • Puttaswamy, T.K (2012), Mathematical Achievements of Pre-modern Indian Mathematicians, Newnes, ISBN 978-0-12-397938-4
  • Kusuba, Takanori (2004), "Indian Rules for the Decomposition of Fractions", in Charles Burnett; Jan P. Hogendijk; Kim Plofker; et al. (eds.), Studies in the History of the Exact Sciences in Honour of David Pingree, Brill, ISBN 9004132023, ISSN 0169-8729
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.