Magic in Ithkar 4

Magic in Ithkar 4 is a shared world anthology of fantasy stories edited by Andre Norton and Robert Adams. It was first published as a paperback by Tor Books in July 1987.[1]

Magic in Ithkar 4
Cover art from the first edition
AuthorAndre Norton and Robert Adams (editors)
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SeriesMagic in Ithkar
GenreFantasy short stories
PublisherTor Books
Publication date
1987
Media typePrint (paperback)
Pages278 pp
ISBN0-8125-4719-5
OCLC16146957
LC ClassPS648.F3 M284 1987
Preceded byMagic in Ithkar 3 

Summary

The book collects fourteen original short stories by various fantasy authors which share the setting of an annual fair in the city of Ithkar, together with an introduction by Adams and notes on the authors by Norton.[2]

Setting

As described in the introduction by co-editor Robert Adams (identical to that in the previous volumes), the world of which Ithkar is a part has suffered from some past holocaust which wiped out an earlier, higher civilization. Subsequently, the area which became Ithkar became a base for the explorations of three godlike visitors, who came to be worshiped as actual deities after their departure. A temple and priesthood dedicated to them developed over succeeding generations, which held a yearly fair on the anniversary of the visitors' first arrival. The city of Ithkar grew up about the temple on the strength of the commerce the fair attracted.

The historical background provided appears science fictional in nature; the war that destroyed the previous culture is related in terms which suggest a nuclear war, complete with radiation-derived mutations of life-forms in the vicinities of the nuclear strikes, while the story of the visitors resembles an expedition of interstellar explorers. Present-day Ithkar is, however, a fantasy setting, in which wizards and sorcerers are rife, and magic works.

Contents

Reception

The book was reviewed by Don D'Ammassa in Science Fiction Chronicle no. 99, December 1987.

Notes

gollark: I agree, extracurricular stuff is a weird thing to base admission stuff on and probably not all that relevant.
gollark: Standardized test things aren't really ideal in terms of judging how good you actually would be about a subject, but if you actually can measure merit well it seems a way better thing to base admission stuff on than the alternatives. It is kind of a big "if", though.
gollark: I mean, it is still discrimination, it's not *reducing* it.
gollark: Presumably, second amendment?
gollark: It would be neat if they had supercapacitor-based low-end short-range self-driving electric cars which could be temporarily rented from a pool for travel in cities or something.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.