List of GE reciprocating engines

List of engines produced by GE Transportation Systems and GE Jenbacher (GE Energy). Where possible, recent examples of usage are shown.

Diesel engines

FDL series[1]
  • GE 7FDL-8, 8-cylinder engine used in locomotives, such as the GE CM20EMP
  • GE 7FDL-12, 12-cylinder engine used in locomotives, such as the GE P32AC-DM[2]
  • GE 7FDL-16, 16-cylinder engine used in locomotives, such as the GE AC4400CW[3]
GEVO series (bore 250mm, stroke 320mm[4])
  • GE GEVO-6, 6-cylinder engine used in locomotive repower/modernization applications[5]
  • GE GEVO-12, 12-cylinder engine used in locomotives, such as the GE ES44AC[6], GE ES43ACi, GE ES43ACmi, and MPI HSP46 Diesel Locomotives
  • GE GEVO-16, 16-cylinder engine used in locomotives, such as the GE ES59ACi[6], GE ES58ACi and GE ES58ACmi Diesel Locomotives.
HDL series[1]
L250
  • GE L250 Series, 6- and 8-cylinder marine engines for propulsion and electric generator usage[8]
PowerHaul series
  • GE PowerHaul P616, 16-cylinder engine used in GE PowerHaul series locomotives.[9]
V228 (formerly 7FDM)
  • GE V228 Series, 8-, 12-, and 16-cylinder marine engines for propulsion and electric generator usage[10]
V250 (formerly 7HDM)
  • GE V250 Series, 12- and 16-cylinder marine engines for propulsion and electric generator usage[11]

Natural gas engines

Jenbacher series
  • INNIO Jenbacher Type 2, 8-cylinder engine for stationary power generation[12]
  • INNIO Jenbacher Type 3, 12-, 16-, and 20-cylinder engines for stationary power generation[13]
  • INNIO Jenbacher Type 4, 12-, 16-, and 20-cylinder engines for stationary power generation[14]
  • INNIO Jenbacher Type 6, 12-, 16-, and 20-cylinder engines for stationary power generation[15]
  • INNIO Jenbacher J624 GS, 24-cylinder engine for stationary power generation[16]
  • INNIO Jenbacher J920 FleXtra, 20-cylinder engine for stationary power generation[17]
gollark: Pascal's Mugging: someone comes up to you and says "give me £100 or I will eternally torture you and 10000 copies of you". Now, obviously, this is quite implausible. But it's a finite chance of an infinitely bad outcome, versus losing that finite amount of money, so you should do it, right?
gollark: I'm not a negative utilitarian, so no.
gollark: It's sort of the same thing the other way round.
gollark: Have you heard of Pascal's *Mugging*?
gollark: Sounds like negative utilitarianism, which is no.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.