Laser detuning

In optical physics, laser detuning is the tuning of a laser to a frequency that is slightly off from a quantum system's resonant frequency. When used as a noun, the laser detuning is the difference between the resonance frequency of the system and the laser's optical frequency (or wavelength). Lasers tuned to a frequency below the resonant frequency are called red-detuned, and lasers tuned above resonance are called blue-detuned.[1]

Illustration

Consider a system with a resonance frequency in the optical frequency range of the electromagnetic spectrum, i.e. with frequency of a few THz to a few PHz, or equivalently with a wavelength in the range of 10 nm to 100 μm. If this system is excited by a laser with a frequency close to this value, the laser detuning is then defined as:

The most common examples of such resonant systems in the optical frequency range are optical cavities (free-space, fiber or microcavities), atoms, and dielectrics or semiconductors.

The laser detuning is important for a resonant system such as a cavity because it determines the phase (modulo 2π) acquired by the laser field per roundtrip. This is important for linear optical processes such as interference and scattering, and extremely important for nonlinear optical processes because it affects the phase-matching condition.

Applications

Laser cooling of atoms

Lasers can be detuned in the lab frame so that they are Doppler shifted to the resonant frequency in a moving system, which allows lasers to affect only atoms moving at a specific speed or in a specific direction and makes laser detuning a central tool of laser cooling[2] and magneto-optical traps.[1]

Optomechanics

A plot of the optically induced damping of a mechanical oscillator in an optomechanical system.

Similar to the laser cooling of atoms, the sign of the detuning plays an important part in Optomechanical applications[3][4]. In the red detuned regime, the optomechanical system undergoes cooling and coherent energy transfer between the light and the mechanical mode (a "beam splitter"). In the blue-detuned regime, it undergoes heating, mechanical amplification and possibly squeezing and entanglement. The on-resonance case when the laser detuning is zero, can be used for very sensitive detection of mechanical motion, such as used in LIGO.

gollark: It's neither.
gollark: <@!139859208592949248> You are trapped in a labyrinth. There are some doors. One of them leads out. One of them leads into a lethal cryoapiary.There are two gollarks in front of the doors. One gollark speaks the truth, one gollark always lies. You suddenly notice other gollarks appearing. The other gollark tells the truth or lies at random. The other² gollark is truthful iff your question does not refer to itself or other gollarks. The other³ gollark calls in orbital laser strikes against those it perceives as asking tricky questions. The other⁴ gollark is truthful iff it predicts (with 99.6% historical accuracy) that you will consider it (one of) the falsehood-telling gollark(s). A subset of the gollarks will say "bee" and "apioform" instead of "true" or "false", but you do not know which or which words "bee" and "apioform" correspond to. The other⁴ gollark just tells you the first bit of the SHA256 hash of your question in UTF-8. Another gollark appears to be randomly materializing doors. The other⁵ gollark will cooperate with you iff you cooperate with CooperateBot/angel. Yet another gollark will tell the truth iff you know what iff means. The final gollark appears to be fiddling with the orbital mind control laser making you know this.What do you do?
gollark: It has port 9999 forwarded now.
gollark: On my raspberry pi.
gollark: Well, yes, but I don't know how to use it without awful merge conflicts and it isn't very realtime.

References

  1. Fritz Riehle (8 May 2006). Frequency Standards: Basics and Applications. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-3-527-60595-8. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  2. Harold J. Metcalf; Peter Van der Straten (1999). Laser cooling and trapping. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-98728-6. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  3. Aspelmeyer, M.; Gröblacher, S.; Hammerer, K.; Kiesel, N. (2010-06-01). "Quantum optomechanics—throwing a glance [Invited]". JOSA B. 27 (6): A189–A197. arXiv:1005.5518. Bibcode:2010JOSAB..27..189A. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.27.00A189. ISSN 1520-8540.
  4. Aspelmeyer, Markus; Kippenberg, Tobias J.; Marquardt, Florian (2014-12-30). "Cavity optomechanics". Reviews of Modern Physics. 86 (4): 1391–1452. arXiv:1303.0733. Bibcode:2014RvMP...86.1391A. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.86.1391.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.