Phlomoides

Phlomoides, also called Jerusalem sage[1] and Lampwick plant,[1] is a genus of over 130 species of flowering plants in the family Lamiaceae, native from the Mediterranean region east across central Asia to China. Phlomoides now comprises the former Notochaete hamosa, many former species of the genera Phlomis and Eremostachys and all of Lamiophlomis and Pseuderemostachys.[2]

Phlomoides
Phlomoides tuberosa
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Clade: Asterids
Order: Lamiales
Family: Lamiaceae
Subfamily: Lamioideae
Genus: Phlomoides
Moench
Species

130+, see text

Species

Species include:[3]

  • Phlomoides alpina
  • Phlomoides azerbaijanica
  • Phlomoides betonicoides
  • Phlomoides bracteosa
  • Phlomoides fulgens
  • Phlomoides hamosa
  • Phlomoides koraiensis – Korean Jerusalem sage[1]
  • Phlomoides macrophylla – Maximowicz's Jerusalem sage[1]
  • Phlomoides maximowiczii
  • Phlomoides melanantha
  • Phlomoides milingensis
  • Phlomoides oreophila
  • Phlomoides ornata
  • Phlomoides pratensis
  • Phlomoides pulchra
  • Phlomoides rotata
  • Phlomoides sewerzovii
  • Phlomoides spectabilis
  • Phlomoides superba
  • Phlomoides tianschanica
  • Phlomoides tuberosa
  • Phlomoides umbrosa – shady Jerusalem sage[1]
  • Phlomoides younghusbandii
gollark: Immediately undergo exponentiation modulo 7, then.
gollark: I do not understand that sentence ("The alternative is work a political method for political reason.") and it is not pizza, I have had no commercial relations with pizza companies, I am not paid to subliminally advertise pizza, etc.
gollark: I guess maybe in politics/economics/sociology the alternative is something like "lean on human intuition" or "make the correct behaviour magically resolve from self-interest". Not sure how well those actually work.
gollark: - the replication crisis does exist, but it's not like *every paper* has a 50% chance of being wrong - it's mostly in some fields and you can generally estimate which things won't replicate fairly well without much specialized knowledge- science™ agrees on lots of things, just not some highly politicized things- you *can* do RCTs and correlation studies and such, which they seem to be ignoring- some objectivity is better than none- sure, much of pop science is not great, but that doesn't invalidate... all science- they complain about running things based on "trial and error and guesswork", but then don't offer any alternative
gollark: The alternative to basing things on science, I mean. The obvious alternative seems to basically just be guessing?

References
  1. English Names for Korean Native Plants (PDF). Pocheon: Korea National Arboretum. 2015. p. 612. ISBN 978-89-97450-98-5. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 May 2017. Retrieved 22 December 2016 – via Korea Forest Service.
  2. Salmaki, Yasaman; Zarre, Shahin; Ryding, Olof; Lindqvist, Charlotte; Scheunert, Agnes; Bräuchler, Christian; Heubl, Heubl (2012). "Phylogeny of the tribe Phlomideae (Lamioideae: Lamiaceae) with special focus on Eremostachys and Phlomoides: New insights from nuclear and chloroplast sequences". Taxon. 61 (1): 161–179. JSTOR 23210322.
  3. "Phlomoides". The Plant List. Kew & MBG. Retrieved 9 December 2016.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.