LAN Manager

LAN Manager was a network operating system (NOS) available from multiple vendors and developed by Microsoft in cooperation with 3Com Corporation. It was designed to succeed 3Com's 3+Share network server software which ran atop a heavily modified version of MS-DOS.

LAN Manager
DeveloperMicrosoft, 3Com
OS familyOS/2
Working stateDiscontinued
Source modelClosed source
Initial release1987 (1987)
Final release2.2a / 1994 (1994)
Marketing targetLocal area networking
Update methodRe-installation
Package managerNone
Platformsx86
LicenseProprietary
Preceded byMS-Net, Xenix-NET, 3+Share

History

LAN Manager was based on the OS/2 operating system co-developed by IBM and Microsoft. It originally used the Server Message Block protocol atop either the NetBIOS Frames protocol (NBF) or a specialized version of the Xerox Network Systems (XNS) protocol. These legacy protocols had been inherited from previous products such as MS-Net for MS-DOS, Xenix-NET for MS-Xenix, and the afore-mentioned 3+Share. A version of LAN Manager for Unix-based systems called LAN Manager/X was also available.

In 1990, Microsoft announced LAN Manager 2.0 with a host of improvements, including support for TCP/IP as a transport protocol. The last version LAN Manager, 2.2, which included an MS-OS/2 1.31 base operating system, remained Microsoft's strategic server system until the release of Windows NT Advanced Server in 1993.

Versions
  • 1987 – MS LAN Manager 1.0 (Basic/Enhanced)
  • 1989 – MS LAN Manager 1.1
  • 1991 – MS LAN Manager 2.0
  • 1992 – MS LAN Manager 2.1
  • 1992 – MS LAN Manager 2.1a
  • 1993 – MS LAN Manager 2.2
  • 1994 – MS LAN Manager 2.2a

Many vendors shipped licensed versions, including:

Cryptanalysis

LAN Manager authentication uses a particularly weak method of hashing a user's password known as the LM hash algorithm, stemming from the mid 1980s when floppy viruses were the major concern as opposed to potentially high-frequency attacks with feedback over a (high-bandwidth) network.[1] This makes such hashes crackable in a matter of seconds using rainbow tables, or in few hours using brute force. Its use in Windows NT was replaced by NTLM, of which older versions are still vulnerable to rainbow tables, but less vulnerable to brute force attacks. NTLM is used for logon with local accounts except on domain controllers since Windows Vista and later versions no longer maintain the LM hash by default.[1] Kerberos is used in Active Directory Environments.

The major weaknesses of LAN Manager authentication protocol are:[2]

  1. Passwords are not case sensitive. All passwords are converted into uppercase before generating the hash value. Hence it takes password, PassWord, PaSsWoRd, PASSword and other similar combinations same as PASSWORD converting all characters to uppercase. Password characters are also limited to a subset of 95 characters in the 256-byte ASCII character set.
  2. Password length is limited to maximum of 14 characters
  3. A 14-character password is broken into 7+7 characters and the hash is calculated for the two halves separately. This way of calculating the hash makes it exponentially easier to crack, as the attacker needs to brute force 7 characters twice instead of 14 characters. This makes the effective strength of a 14-characters password equal to only , or twice that of a 7-character password, which is significantly less complex than the theoretical strength of a 14-character password.
  4. If the password is 7 characters or less, then the second half of hash will always produce same constant value (0xAAD3B435B51404EE). Therefore, if the length of password is less than or equal to 7 characters, then a password length of 7 characters or less can be identified visibly without using tools.
  5. The hash value is sent to network servers without salting, making it susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks such as replay the hash, and also allowing rainbow tables to be constructed.

LM hash details

LM hash (also known as LanMan hash or LAN Manager hash) is a compromised password hashing function that was the primary hash that Microsoft LAN Manager and Microsoft Windows versions prior to Windows NT used to store user passwords. Support for the legacy LAN Manager protocol continued in later versions of Windows for backward compatibility, but was recommended by Microsoft to be turned off by administrators; as of Windows Vista, the protocol is disabled by default, but continues to be used by some non-Microsoft SMB implementations.

Algorithm

The LM hash is computed as follows:[3][4]

  1. The user's password is restricted to a maximum of fourteen characters.[Notes 1]
  2. The user’s password is converted to uppercase.
  3. The user's password is encoded in the System OEM code page.[5]
  4. This password is null-padded to 14 bytes.[6]
  5. The “fixed-length” password is split into two 7-byte halves.
  6. These values are used to create two DES keys, one from each 7-byte half, by converting the seven bytes into a bit stream with the most significant bit first, and inserting a null bit after every seven bits (so 1010100 becomes 10101000). This generates the 64 bits needed for a DES key. (A DES key ostensibly consists of 64 bits; however, only 56 of these are actually used by the algorithm. The null bits added in this step are later discarded.)
  7. Each of the two keys is used to DES-encrypt the constant ASCII string “KGS!@#$%”,[Notes 2] resulting in two 8-byte ciphertext values. The DES CipherMode should be set to ECB, and PaddingMode should be set to NONE.
  8. These two ciphertext values are concatenated to form a 16-byte value, which is the LM hash.

Security weaknesses

Although it is based on DES, a well-studied and formerly secure block cipher, the LM hash is not a true one-way function as the password can be determined from the hash because of several weaknesses in its design:[7] Firstly, passwords are limited to a maximum of only 14 characters, giving a theoretical maximum keyspace of with the 95 ASCII printable characters.

Secondly, passwords longer than 7 characters are divided into two pieces and each piece is hashed separately; this weakness allows each half of the password to be attacked separately at exponentially lower cost than the whole, as only different 7-character password pieces are possible with the same character set. By mounting a brute-force attack on each half separately, modern desktop machines can crack alphanumeric LM hashes in a few hours. In addition, all lower case letters in the password are changed to upper case before the password is hashed, which further reduces the key space for each half to .

The LM hash also does not use cryptographic salt, a standard technique to prevent pre-computed dictionary attacks. A time–memory tradeoff cryptanalysis attack, such as a rainbow table, is therefore feasible. In addition, any password that is shorter than 8 characters will result in the hashing of 7 null bytes, yielding the constant value of 0xAAD3B435B51404EE, hence making it easy to identify short passwords on sight. In 2003, Ophcrack, an implementation of the rainbow table technique, was published. It specifically targets the weaknesses of LM encryption, and includes pre-computed data sufficient to crack virtually all alphanumeric LM hashes in a few seconds. Many cracking tools, e.g. RainbowCrack, L0phtCrack and Cain, now incorporate similar attacks and make cracking of LM hashes fast and trivial.

A final weakness of LM hashes lies in their implementation — since they change only when a user changes their password, they can be used to carry out a pass the hash attack.

Workarounds

To address the security weaknesses inherent in LM encryption and authentication schemes, Microsoft introduced the NTLMv1 protocol in 1993 with Windows NT 3.1. For hashing, NTLM uses Unicode support, replacing LMhash=DESeach(DOSCHARSET(UPPERCASE(password)), "KGS!@#$%") by NThash=MD4(UTF-16-LE(password)), which does not require any padding or truncating that would simplify the key. On the negative side, the same DES algorithm was used with only 56-bit encryption for the subsequent authentication steps, and there is still no salting. Furthermore, Windows machines were for many years configured by default to send and accept responses derived from both the LM hash and the NTLM hash, so the use of the NTLM hash provided no additional security while the weaker hash was still present. It also took time for artificial restrictions on password length in management tools such as User Manager to be lifted.

While LAN Manager is considered obsolete and current Windows operating systems use the stronger NTLMv2 or Kerberos authentication methods, Windows systems before Windows Vista/Windows Server 2008 enabled the LAN Manager hash by default for backward compatibility with legacy LAN Manager and Windows ME or earlier clients, or legacy NetBIOS-enabled applications. It has for many years been considered good security practice to disable the compromised LM and NTLMv1 authentication protocols where they aren't needed.[8] Starting with Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008, Microsoft disabled the LM hash by default; the feature can be enabled for local accounts via a security policy setting, and for Active Directory accounts by applying the same setting via domain Group Policy. The same method can be used to turn the feature off in Windows 2000, Windows XP and NT.[8] Users can also prevent a LM hash from being generated for their own password by using a password at least fifteen characters in length.[6] -- NTLM hashes have in turn become vulnerable in recent years to various attacks that effectively make them as weak today as LanMan hashes were back in 1998.

Reasons for continued use of LM hash

Many legacy third party SMB implementations have taken considerable time to add support for the stronger protocols that Microsoft has created to replace LM hashing because the open source communities supporting these libraries first had to reverse engineer the newer protocols—Samba took 5 years to add NTLMv2 support, while JCIFS took 10 years.

Availability of NTLM protocols to replace LM authentication
Product NTLMv1 support NTLMv2 support
Windows NT 3.1 RTM (1993) Not supported
Windows NT 3.5 RTM (1994) Not supported
Windows NT 3.51 RTM (1995) Not supported
Windows NT 4 RTM (1996) Service Pack 4[9] (25 October 1998)
Windows 95 Not supported Directory services client (released with Windows 2000 Server, 17 February 2000)
Windows 98 RTM Directory services client (released with Windows 2000 Server, 17 February 2000)
Windows 2000 RTM (17 February 2000) RTM (17 February 2000)
Windows ME RTM (14 September 2000) Directory services client (released with Windows 2000 Server, 17 February 2000)
Samba ? Version 3.0[10] (24 September 2003)
JCIFS Not supported Version 1.3.0 (25 October 2008)[11]
IBM AIX (SMBFS) 5.3 (2004)[12] Not supported as of v7.1[13]

Poor patching regimes subsequent to software releases supporting the feature becoming available have contributed to some organisations continuing to use LM Hashing in their environments, even though the protocol is easily disabled in Active Directory itself.

Lastly, prior to the release of Windows Vista, many unattended build processes still used a DOS boot disk (instead of Windows PE) to start the installation of Windows using WINNT.EXE, something that requires LM hashing to be enabled for the legacy LAN Manager networking stack to work.

gollark: On desktop Linux, I can fit a bootable system onto a small USB stick and happily run it on any modern x86 device. On Android, every device needs its own monolithic system image which is nightmarish to compile.
gollark: My device *is* rooted, which was really not a very pleasant process. But the entire Android architecture appears like a horrible locked-down mess.
gollark: I mean, Android is "Linux". Yet it's horrible and you basically can't do anything.
gollark: it is "Linux", but many of them come with locked down configurations, and I don't think you can access Linuxy features meaningfully.
gollark: Oh, the other thing.

See also

Notes
  1. If the password is more than fourteen characters long, the LM hash cannot be computed.
  2. The string “KGS!@#$%” could possibly mean Key of Glen and Steve and then the combination of Shift + 12345. Glen Zorn and Steve Cobb are the authors of RFC 2433 (Microsoft PPP CHAP Extensions).

References
  1. Jesper Johansson. "The Most Misunderstood Windows Security Setting of All Time". TechNet Magazine. Microsoft. Retrieved 2 November 2015. Although Windows Vista has not been released yet, it is worthwhile to point out some changes in this operating system related to these protocols. The most important change is that the LM protocol can no longer be used for inbound authentication—where Windows Vista is acting as the authentication server.
  2. Rahul Kokcha
  3. "Chapter 3 - Operating System Installation: The LMHash". Microsoft Technet. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  4. Glass, Eric (2006). "The NTLM Authentication Protocol and Security Support Provider: The LM Response". Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  5. "List of Localized MS Operating Systems". Microsoft Developer Network. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  6. "Cluster service account password must be set to 15 or more characters if the NoLMHash policy is enabled". Microsoft. 2006-10-30. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  7. Johansson, Jasper M. (2004-06-29). "Windows Passwords: Everything You Need To Know". Microsoft. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  8. "How to prevent Windows from storing a LAN manager hash of your password in Active Directory and local SAM databases". Microsoft Knowledge Base. 2007-12-03. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  9. "Windows NT 4.0 Service Pack 4 Readme.txt File (40-bit)". Microsoft. 1998-10-25. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  10. "The Samba Team announces the first official release of Samba 3.0". SAMBA. 2003-09-24. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  11. "The Java CIFS Client Library". Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  12. "AIX 5.3 Networks and communication management: Server Message Block file system". IBM. 2010-03-15. p. 441. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  13. "AIX 7.1 Networks and communication management: Server Message Block file system". IBM. 2011-12-05. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.