King v. Chapman

King v. Chapman is a 1945 court case between Primus King, a religious leader and barber in Columbus, Georgia, and J. E. Chapman, Jr., the chair of the Muscogee County Democratic Party. It ruled the white primary as used by the Democratic Party of Georgia to be unconstitutional.[1] This case followed the Smith v. Allwright case, which struck down the white primaries in Texas and began the downfall of white primaries in other Deep South states.

Background and ruling
See also: White primaries

On July 4, 1944, Primus E. King, an African-American registered voter, went to the Muscogee County Courthouse in Columbus to cast his vote in the Democratic Party’s primary election. He was turned away by law enforcement. Dr. Thomas Brewer, a local physician who co-founded the local branch of the NAACP, encouraged and financially supported Mr. King in his lawsuit filed in federal court. In a landmark ruling in 1945, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia found in Mr. King's favor, deciding that the exclusion of black voters was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth, Fifteenth and Seventeenth Amendments.[1] The U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed,[2] and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal by Chapman,[3] which ended the white primary in Georgia.[4]

Impact

The end of the white primary in Georgia allowed African Americans to pursue the right to vote in Georgia for the first time, although the enforcement of poll taxes, literacy tests and the County Unit System would remain a significant barrier to most African-American voters in Georgia until the 1960s. It would take nearly two decades before Leroy Johnson, the first African American to serve in the Georgia General Assembly, would be elected.

King v. Chapman also served as an inspiration to Martin Luther King, Jr., then a 15-year-old who was admitted to Morehouse College.

gollark: АБВГДЕЁЖЗИЙКЛМНОПРСТУФХЦЧШЩЪЫЬЭЮЯІѲѢѴЅѮѰѠѪѦѬѨОЕАИНТСЛВРКМДПЫУБЯЬГЗЧЙЖХШЮЦЭЩФЁЪіѳѣѵ by the way.
gollark: Oh.
gollark: Lowercase or uppercase?
gollark: The... Russian alphabet?
gollark: ```Use of hate speech, racial slurs, threats, and any other language that could be considered harmful to a person or a group of people is not allowed. Discussion of such language, when it is clear that it is not being used for the intent of harm, is okay, but should be undertaken with caution.```This is clearly being used as an insult.

References
  1. King v. Chapman, 62 F. Supp. 639 (M.D. Ga. 1945).
  2. Chapman v. King, 154 F.2d 460 (5th Cir. 1946).
  3. Chapman v. King, 327 U.S. 800 (1946).
  4. "Primus King and the Civil Rights Movement". Georgia Historical Society. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.