K-distribution

In probability and statistics, the K-distribution is a three-parameter family of continuous probability distributions. The distribution arises by compounding two gamma distributions. In each case, a re-parametrization of the usual form of the family of gamma distributions is used, such that the parameters are:

  • the mean of the distribution, and
  • the usual shape parameter.

K-distribution is a special case of variance-gamma distribution, which in turn is a special case of generalised hyperbolic distribution.

Density

The model is that random variable has a gamma distribution with mean and shape parameter , with being treated as a random variable having another gamma distribution, this time with mean and shape parameter . The result is that has the following probability density function (pdf) for :[1]

where and is a modified Bessel function of the second kind. In this derivation, the K-distribution is a compound probability distribution. It is also a product distribution:[1] it is the distribution of the product of two independent random variables, one having a gamma distribution with mean 1 and shape parameter , the second having a gamma distribution with mean and shape parameter .

A simpler two parameter formalization of the K-distribution is[2]

where v is the shape factor, b is the scale factor, and K is the modified Bessel function of second kind.

This distribution derives from a paper by Eric Jakeman and Peter Pusey (1978) who used it to model microwave sea echo. Jakeman and Tough (1987) derived the distribution from a biased random walk model. Ward (1981) derived the distribution from the product for two random variables, z = a y, where a has a chi distribution and y a complex Gaussian distribution. The modulus of z, |z|, then has K distribution.

Moments

The moment generating function is given by[3]

where is the Whittaker function.

The n-th moments of K-distribution is given by[1]

So the mean and variance are given[1] by

Other properties

All the properties of the distribution are symmetric in and [1]

Applications

K-distribution arises as the consequence of a statistical or probabilistic model used in synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) imagery. The K-distribution is formed by compounding two separate probability distributions, one representing the radar cross-section, and the other representing speckle that is a characteristic of coherent imaging. It is also used in wireless communication to model composite fast fading and shadowing effects.

Notes

  1. Redding (1999)
  2. Long (2001)
  3. Bithas (2006)

Sources

  • Redding, Nicholas J. (1999) Estimating the Parameters of the K Distribution in the Intensity Domain . Report DSTO-TR-0839, DSTO Electronics and Surveillance Laboratory, South Australia. p. 60
  • Jakeman, E. and Pusey, P. N. (1978) "Significance of K-Distributions in Scattering Experiments", Physical Review Letters, 40, 546550 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.546
  • Jakeman, E. and Tough, R. J. A. (1987) "Generalized K distribution: a statistical model for weak scattering," J. Opt. Soc. Am., 4, (9), pp. 1764 - 1772.
  • Ward, K. D. (1981) "Compound representation of high resolution sea clutter," Electron. Lett., 17, pp. 561 - 565.
  • Long, M.W. (2001) "Radar Reflectivity of Land and Sea," 3rd ed., Artech House, Norwood, MA, 2001.
  • Bithas, P.S.; Sagias, N.C.; Mathiopoulos, P.T.; Karagiannidis, G.K.; Rontogiannis, A.A. (2006) "On the performance analysis of digital communications over generalized-K fading channels," IEEE Communications Letters, 10 (5), pp. 353 - 355.

Further reading

  • Jakeman, E. (1980) "On the statistics of K-distributed noise", Journal of Physics A: Mathematics and General, 13, 3148
  • Ward, K.D.; Tough, Robert J.A; Watts, Simon (2006) Sea Clutter: Scattering, the K Distribution and Radar Performance, Institution of Engineering and Technology. ISBN 0-86341-503-2
gollark: If *evolution*... well, "attempts" would be anthropomorphizing it... to cross said chasm, all it can do is just throw broken ones at it repeatedly with no understanding, and select for better ones until one actually sticks.
gollark: If I want to cross a chasm with a bridge, or something, I can draw on my limited knowledge of physics and materials science and whatever and put together a somewhat sensible prototype, then make inferences from what happens to it, and get something working out.
gollark: No. We can reason about problems in various ways. So can some animals.
gollark: It doesn't have its own will. It's a giant non-agent mess driven by tons of interacting blind optimization processes.
gollark: Depends. There's not a general answer which isn't vaguely stupid somehow.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.