James Heilman

James M. Heilman (born 1979 or 1980) is a Canadian emergency physician, Wikipedian, and advocate for the improvement of Wikipedia's health-related content. He encourages other clinicians to contribute to the online encyclopedia.[1][2]

James Heilman
Heilman at Wikimania 2015
Born
James M. Heilman

1979/1980 (age 39–40)
Saskatchewan, Canada
Medical career
ProfessionPhysician
FieldEmergency medicine
Institutions

With the Wikipedia username Doc James, Heilman is an active contributor to WikiProject Medicine and a volunteer Wikipedia administrator. He was the president of Wikimedia Canada between 2010 and 2013, and founded and was formerly the president of Wiki Project Med Foundation.[3][4][5][6][7] He is also the founder of WikiProject Medicine's Medicine Translation Task Force.[8] In June 2015, he was elected to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees, a position which he held until he was removed on December 28, 2015.[9][10][11] Heilman was re-elected to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees in May 2017.[12]

Heilman is a clinical assistant professor at the department of emergency medicine at the University of British Columbia,[13][14] and the head of the department of emergency medicine at East Kootenay Regional Hospital in Cranbrook, British Columbia, where he lives.[1][15]

Early life and education

Born in 1979 or 1980,[15] Heilman was born and raised in rural Saskatchewan.[16] He graduated from the University of Saskatchewan in 2000 with a Bachelor of Science degree in anatomy, and he subsequently earned his medical degree there in 2003.[1] He then completed his family medicine residency in British Columbia from 2003 to 2005.[16] Heilman currently holds a certificate of added competency in the field of emergency medicine with the College of Family Physicians of Canada.[17]

Medical career

Heilman worked at Moose Jaw Union Hospital, a hospital in Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan, until 2010, when he began working at East Kootenay Regional Hospital,[1][18] where, in October 2012, he was appointed head of the department of emergency medicine.[1] In 2014, he told the Cranbrook Daily Townsman that the emergency department at East Kootenay saw an average of 22,000 patients each year.[19]

Research

As of May 2014, Heilman was working on a study with Samir Grover, of the University of Toronto, which would assign medical students to take a test using either Wikipedia or medical textbooks to determine which is more accurate.[20] Later that year, Heilman co-authored a version of the Wikipedia article for dengue fever in the peer-reviewed journal Open Medicine.[21] Heilman also worked on a study with Microsoft which found that in the three countries where the 2013–2016 Ebola outbreak had the largest impact, Wikipedia was the most popular source for information about the disease.[22] In 2015, Heilman and Andrew West published a study which found that the number of Wikipedia editors who focused on editing medical articles decreased by 40 per cent from 2008 to 2013.[23] These results, together with other detailed analyses about the production and consumption of medical content on Wikipedia, were published by the Journal of Medical Internet Research in 2015.[24]

Wikipedia and Wikimedia activities

Since the beginning of his activity as a contributor to medicine-related Wikipedia articles in 2008, Heilman has been promoting the improvement of medical content by encouraging fellow physicians to take part.[1] He became interested in editing Wikipedia on a slow night shift, when he looked up the article on obesity and found that it contained many errors. "I realized that I could fix it. I made a huge number of edits and improved the quality a great deal. I sort of became hooked from there," he told the Hamilton Spectator in 2011.[2] As of 2016, he edited medical articles on Wikipedia for about 60 hours a week.[25]

Heilman takes part in an initiative through Wiki Project Med Foundation with Translators Without Borders, working to improve and translate English Wikipedia medical articles of top importance into minority languages.[26][27][28] The Wiki Project Med Foundation has started a collaboration with the University of California, San Francisco as a recruit for scientifically literate editors, by giving students college credit for improving medicine-related Wikipedia pages.[29] In 2014, the Wiki Project Med Foundation also partnered with the Cochrane Collaboration, with the goal of improving the reliability and accuracy of information on Wikipedia. With regard to this partnership, Heilman said, "The way Wikipedia works is that all content is to stand entirely on the references that are listed. If the best quality sources are used to write Wikipedia there's a good chance that Wikipedia will contain the best quality information."[30]

Heilman spoke at Wikimania 2014, where he said that 93 per cent of medical students use Wikipedia, and argued that "fixing the internet" is now a critical task for anyone who cares about healthcare.[31]

Ebola contributions

By reviewing and correcting medical content in the manner promoted by Heilman (and with many of his contributions), in Wikipedia articles like that about Ebola, Wikipedia has become a source of information to the general public, thus being regarded among respected sites run by the World Health Organization[32] and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,[33] covering the topic.[3][34] Heilman reduced the time he spent working in the emergency department so he could spend more time updating this page.[35] In 2014, he told the Cranbrook Daily Townsman that with respect to Wikipedia's coverage of Ebola, "The big thing is emphasizing what we know, making sure that minor concerns don’t get blown out of proportion."[36] He also said that, despite rumours to the contrary, there was no evidence that the disease had become airborne, and that ebola had caused far fewer deaths than other conditions such as malaria and gastroenteritis.[36]

Rorschach test images

In 2009, Heilman, who was then a resident of Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan,[37] added public domain images of the ink blots used in the Rorschach test to the Wikipedia article on the subject, and concerned psychologists said that this could invalidate the tests.[18][38][39] Some psychologists stated the test had "already lost its popularity and usefulness."[18][39] In an interview with The New York Times, Heilman stated that he added the entire set because a debate about a single image seemed absurd and psychologists' fears were unfounded.[40] Appearing on Canada AM on July 31, 2009, Heilman also said that "This information [i.e. the inkblots] is encyclopedic. This is what people expect to see when they see this page."[41] In August 2009, two Canadian psychologists filed complaints about Heilman to his local doctors' organization; Heilman called the complaints "intimidation tactics".[42] In September 2009, the College of Psychologists of British Columbia urged the Saskatchewan College of Physicians and Surgeons to launch an investigation into Heilman's posting of the images. Heilman told CTV News that "The psychological community is trying to exclude everybody outside their field from taking part in discussions related to what they do. And personally, I think that's bad science."[43] An extensive debate ensued on Wikipedia, and the images were kept.[40]

Textbook plagiarism of Wikipedia

In 2012, Heilman noticed that the book Understanding and Management of Special Child in Pediatric Dentistry, published by Jaypee Brothers, contained a long passage about HIV that was plagiarized from Wikipedia's article on the subject.[26] This subsequently led to the book being withdrawn by the publisher.[44]

In October 2014, while reading a copy of the Oxford Textbook of Zoonoses (published by Oxford University Press), Heilman noticed that the book's section on Ebola was very similar to the Wikipedia page on that subject.[23] He initially suspected that a Wikipedia editor had copied the portion but later noticed that the part of the Wikipedia article that resembled the part of the textbook had been written in 2006 and 2010, while the textbook had not been published until 2011.[23] Christian Purdy, an Oxford University Press spokesperson, acknowledged that some of the text in the textbook had been copied but described it as an "inadvertent omission of an appropriate attribution" rather than plagiarism.[23]

Tenure on the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees

In June 2015, Heilman was elected by the community to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees.[9] In December 2015, the board removed Heilman from his position as a Trustee,[10][45] a decision that generated substantial controversy amongst members of the Wikipedia community.[46] A statement released by the board declared the lack of confidence of his fellow trustees in him as the reasons for his ousting. Heilman later stated that he "was given the option of resigning [by the board] over the last few weeks. As a community elected member I see my mandate as coming from the community which elected me and thus declined to do so. I saw such a move as letting down those who elected me."[47] He subsequently pointed out that while on the board, he had pushed for greater transparency regarding the Wikimedia Foundation's controversial Knowledge Engine project and its financing,[48] and indicated that his attempts to make public the Knight Foundation grant for the engine had been a factor in his dismissal.[49]

The volunteer community re-elected him to the Wikimedia Foundation board in 2017.[50]

Other

In 2012, Heilman was one of two Wikimedia contributors sued by Internet Brands for shifting freely licensed content and volunteer editors from the for-profit site Wikitravel to the non-profit site Wikivoyage. The Wikimedia Foundation defended Heilman's actions in the lawsuit, citing volunteer freedom of choice.[51][52] In February 2013, the parties settled their litigation.[53] In 2014, Heilman criticized a study which concluded that 9 out of 10 Wikipedia medical articles contained errors.[5][54][55] In 2015, the Atlantic ran a piece about conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia which detailed Heilman's efforts to counteract edits made by employees of Medtronic to the Wikipedia page for percutaneous vertebroplasty.[23] In 2017, Vice also ran an article about conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia, in which the author noted that Heilman had vocally called on the Wikimedia Foundation to increase its enforcement of Wikipedia's policy against undisclosed paid editing.[56]

Personal life

Heilman enjoys running ultramarathons and adventure racing.[18][57] He and his girlfriend ran the Gobi March in 2008.[58] He has also run the Marathon des Sables, the Adventure Racing World Championships,[16] and the Saskatchewan Marathon.[59]

gollark: I have now cropped it right.
gollark: I apparently messed up the coords and added a large border but whatever.
gollark: There we go.
gollark: Wow, I did* this right**.
gollark: "H"elo.

See also

References
  1. Fleck, Fiona (January 1, 2013). "Online encyclopedia provides free health info for all". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. World Health Organization. 91 (1): 8–9. doi:10.2471/BLT.13.030113. PMC 3537258. PMID 23397345.
  2. Mcneil, Mark (October 4, 2011). "Wikipedia makes a house call to Mac". The Spec. Retrieved January 12, 2014.
  3. Cohen, Noam (October 26, 2014). "Wikipedia Emerges as Trusted Internet Source for Ebola Information". The New York Times. Retrieved October 26, 2014.
  4. Berko, Lex (2013). "Medical Students Can Now Earn Credit for Editing Wikipedia". Vice. Archived from the original on January 12, 2014. Retrieved January 12, 2014.
  5. Stephens, Pippa (May 28, 2014). "Trust your doctor, not Wikipedia, say scientists". BBC News. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  6. Trujillo, Maria (November 25, 2011). "Wikipedia and Higher Education – The Infinite Possibilities". University of British Columbia. Retrieved January 9, 2014.
  7. Bunim, Juliana. "UCSF First U.S. Medical School to Offer Credit For Wikipedia Articles". University of California, San Francisco. Retrieved January 12, 2014.
  8. Beck, Julie (March 5, 2014). "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia". The Atlantic. Retrieved August 1, 2015.
  9. Varnum, Gregory (June 5, 2015). "Wikimedia Foundation Board election results are in". Wikimedia blog. Retrieved June 11, 2015.
  10. "Resolution:James Heilman Removal". Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. December 28, 2015. Retrieved December 29, 2015.
  11. Kleinz, Torsten (December 29, 2015). "Wikimedia Foundation feuert Vorstandsmitglied". Heise Online. Retrieved January 1, 2016.
  12. Chan, Katie; Sutherland, Joe (May 20, 2017). "Results from the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections". Wikimedia blog. Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved July 13, 2017. The results from this year’s community selection of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees are in! Congratulations to María Sefidari (User:Raystorm), Dariusz Jemielniak (User:pundit), and James Heilman (User:Doc James) for receiving the most community support. They will begin the three-year terms being filled through this process after they are officially appointed by the current trustees, which will occur at their August meeting at Wikimania 2017.
  13. "James Heilman, MD, CCFP-EM". University of British Columbia. Retrieved April 19, 2016.
  14. McClurg, Lesley; Brooks, Jon (November 3, 2016). "Should You Use Wikipedia for Medical Information?". KQED. Archived from the original on November 5, 2016. Retrieved November 4, 2016.
  15. Laidlaw, Katherine (September 2013). "Is Google Making Us Sick?". Reader's Digest. Retrieved January 9, 2014.
  16. "Board of Trustees". Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
  17. https://emergency.med.ubc.ca/person/james-heilman/
  18. White, Patrick (July 29, 2009). "Rorschach and Wikipedia: The battle of the inkblots". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved January 12, 2014.
  19. MacDonald, Sally (June 16, 2014). "Five family doctors closing down their Cranbrook practices". Cranbrook Daily Townsman.
  20. Beck, Julie (May 7, 2014). "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?". The Atlantic. Retrieved March 30, 2015.
  21. "How doctors are working to improve Wikipedia's accuracy". The Advisory Board Company. November 15, 2016.
  22. Murray, Terry (January 27, 2015). "WikiProject Medicine Making Progress". CMAJ. 187 (4): 245. doi:10.1503/cmaj.109-4982. PMC 4347770. PMID 25646285.
  23. Pinsker, Joe (August 11, 2015). "The Covert World of People Trying to Edit Wikipedia—for Pay". The Atlantic. Retrieved August 11, 2015.
  24. Heilman, JM; West, AG (March 4, 2015). "Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 17 (3): e62. doi:10.2196/jmir.4069. PMC 4376174. PMID 25739399.
  25. Brooks, Jon (December 22, 2016). "Wikipedia Handles Fake News With Humans, Not Algorithms". KQED. Retrieved June 4, 2017.
  26. Cohen, Noam (June 12, 2012). "Book That Plagiarized From Wikipedia Is Pulled From Market". New York Times. Retrieved January 14, 2014.
  27. Teigen, Sarah (October–November 2012). "Medical translations for minority languages" (PDF). Multilingual. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 12, 2014. Retrieved January 12, 2014 – via TranslatorsWithoutBorders.org.
  28. Yeung, Lien (August 21, 2014). "Wikipedia's medical errors and one doctor's fight to correct them". CBC News.
  29. Sankin, Aaron (October 1, 2013). "Doctors prescribe better editors for Wikipedia—themselves". The Daily Dot. Retrieved April 6, 2015.
  30. Ritger, Clara (February 20, 2014). "Wikipedia Is a Massively Popular (Yet Untested) Doctor". National Journal. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  31. Reisz, Matthew (August 14, 2014). "Wikimania: student medics get credit for webside manner". Times Higher Education. Retrieved January 12, 2015.
  32. "Ebola virus disease". World Health Organization.
  33. "Ebola (Ebola virus disease)". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. August 3, 2018.
  34. Judd, Amy (November 14, 2014). "B.C. doctor part of team editing popular Wikipedia page on Ebola". Global News. Retrieved February 7, 2015.
  35. Sluizer, Jan (December 3, 2014). "Medical Students Learn to Treat Ailing Wikipedia Entries". Voice of America. Archived from the original on December 25, 2014. Retrieved April 19, 2015.
  36. "Keeping the facts straight". Cranbrook Daily Townsman. November 20, 2014. Archived from the original on September 23, 2015. Retrieved August 13, 2015.
  37. "Moose Jaw Doctor won't back down". mjtimes.sk.ca. Archived from the original on February 4, 2016. Retrieved September 1, 2015.
  38. Sample, Ian (July 29, 2009). "Testing times for Wikipedia after doctor posts secrets of the Rorschach inkblots". The Guardian. Retrieved January 12, 2014.
  39. "Sask. MD's Wikipedia posting of ink blots angers psychologists". CBC News. July 31, 2009. Retrieved January 9, 2014.
  40. Cohen, Noam (July 28, 2009). "A Rorschach Cheat Sheet on Wikipedia?". The New York Times. Retrieved January 9, 2014.
  41. "Psychologists see red over inkblot test posting". CTV News. July 31, 2009. Retrieved August 22, 2015.
  42. Cohen, Noam (August 23, 2009). "Complaint Over Doctor Who Posted Inkblot Test". New York Times. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  43. Canadian Press (September 3, 2009). "B.C. College calls for Rorschach action". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved November 30, 2014.
  44. "Mangalore professor in plagiarism row". New Indian Express. November 11, 2013. Retrieved August 21, 2015.
  45. "[Wikimedia-l] Announcement about changes to the Board". wikimedia.org. Retrieved January 7, 2016.
  46. Lih, Andrew (January 15, 2016). "Wikipedia just turned 15 years old. Will it survive 15 more?". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 16, 2016.
  47. Orlowski, Andrew (January 12, 2016). "Wikimedia Foundation bins community-elected trustee". The Register. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
  48. Noisette, Thierry. "Crise à la fondation Wikimedia : sa directrice démissionne". Nouvel Observateur.
  49. Koebler, Jason (February 15, 2016). "The Secret Search Engine Tearing Wikipedia Apart". Vice. Retrieved February 29, 2016.
  50. Kolbe, Andreas (June 7, 2017). "Golden handshakes of almost half a million at Wikimedia Foundation". The Register. Retrieved October 10, 2017.
  51. Cohen, Noam (September 9, 2012). "Travel Site Built on Wiki Ethos Now Bedevils Its Owner". New York Times. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  52. Morris, Kevin (September 6, 2012). "Wikimedia announces travel site, launches countersuit against competitor". The Daily Dot. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  53. Musil, Steven (February 17, 2013). "Wikimedia, Internet Brands settle Wikivoyage lawsuits". CNET. Retrieved January 20, 2014.
  54. McClurg, Lesley (November 8, 2016). "Should I Trust Wikipedia With My Health?". NPR. Retrieved September 9, 2017.
  55. Chatterjee, Anwesh; Cooke, Robin M.T.; Furst, Ian; Heilman, James (June 23, 2014). "Is Wikipedia's medical content really 90% wrong?". Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  56. Bateman, Oliver Lee (February 1, 2017). "Wikipedia Is Being Ripped Apart By a Witch Hunt For Secretly Paid Editors". Motherboard. Retrieved October 10, 2017.
  57. O'Meara, Dina (April 24, 2006). "Mind over mountain". Western Standard. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 20, 2015.
  58. "Surviving the Gobi march". Moose Jaw Times-Herald. July 4, 2008. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 20, 2015.
  59. "28th Annual Saskatchewan Marathon". Saskatoon StarPhoenix. May 29, 2006. Archived from the original on February 4, 2016. Retrieved August 22, 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.