In Answer to Various Bards

In Answer to Various Bards (a.k.a. An Answer to Various Bards) is a poem by Australian writer and poet Andrew Barton "Banjo" Paterson. It was first published in The Bulletin magazine on 1 October 1892 in reply to fellow poet Henry Lawson's poem, In Answer to "Banjo", and Otherwise.

In Up The Country, Lawson had criticised "The City Bushman" such as Banjo Paterson who tended to romanticise bush life. Paterson, in turn, accused Lawson of representing bush life as nothing but doom and gloom,[1] famously ending with the line "For the bush will never suit you, and you'll never suit the bush." [2]

This exchange sparked what is known as the Bulletin Debate, mainly between Paterson and Lawson, but also including Edward Dyson and Francis Kenna.

Reception

Writing in The Advertiser, in a review of Saltbush Bill, J.P., and Other Verses, a reviewer states: "The 'note of melancholy' which Marcus Clarke and other writers have found in the bush does not appeal to him [Paterson], and he has set out his attitude in regard to the 'dismal' tribe in 'an answer to various bards,' which appears in this volume."[3]

Further publications

  • Saltbush Bill, J.P., and Other Verses by A. B. Paterson (1917)
  • The Collected Verse of A.B. Paterson (1921)
  • Singer of the Bush, A. B. (Banjo) Paterson : Complete Works 1885-1900 compiled by Rosamund Campbell and Philippa Harvie (1983)
  • The Penguin Book of Australian Satirical Verse edited by Philip Neilsen (1986)
  • A Vision Splendid : The Complete Poetry of A. B. 'Banjo' Paterson (1990)
  • The Macmillan Anthology of Australian Literature edited by Ken L. Goodwin and Alan Lawson (1990)
  • Selected Poems : A. B. Paterson edited by Les Murray (1992)
  • The Collected Verse of Banjo Paterson A. B. Paterson edited by Clement Semmler (1992)
  • Banjo Paterson : His Poetry and Prose' by Richard Hall (1993)
  • The Sting in the Wattle : Australian Satirical Verse edited by Philip Neilsen (1993)
gollark: (Similarly to math, table, etc)
gollark: A lot of the builtins in JS similarly just act as containers for static methods.
gollark: Yes.
gollark: Thus, """object""".
gollark: You can do `str:sub` and such because something something metatable.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.