I. Howard Marshall

Ian Howard Marshall (12 January 1934 – 12 December 2015) was a Scottish New Testament scholar. He was Professor Emeritus of New Testament Exegesis at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland. He was formerly the chair of the Tyndale Fellowship for Biblical and Theological Research; he was also president of the British New Testament Society and chair of the Fellowship of European Evangelical Theologians. Marshall identified as an Evangelical Methodist. He was the author of numerous publications, including 2005 Gold Medallion Book Award winner New Testament Theology.

I. Howard Marshall
Born
Ian Howard Marshall

(1934-01-12)12 January 1934
Scotland
Died12 December 2015(2015-12-12) (aged 81)
TitleEmeritus Professor of New Testament Exegesis and Honorary Research Professor at the University of Aberdeen
Board member ofChair of the Tyndale Fellowship for Biblical and Theological Research
Spouse(s)Maureen Wing Sheung Yeung
Academic background
EducationCambridge, Asbury University
Alma materUniversity of Aberdeen (Ph.D.)
Academic work
DisciplineBiblical studies
Sub-disciplineNew Testament studies
InstitutionsUniversity of Aberdeen
Notable worksNew Testament Interpretation, Luke: Historian and Theologian & The Gospel of Luke (NIGTC)

Biography

Personal life

Marshall was born on 12 January 1934. He was the son of Ernest Ewart Marshall and Ethel Marshall (née Curran). Marshall married Joyce Elizabeth Proudfoot in 1961 and had four children. She died in 1996.[1] In 2011, Marshall married Dr. Maureen Wing Sheung Yeung, former president of Evangel Seminary, Hong Kong.[2] Marshall died of pancreatic cancer in 2015.[3]

Education

Career

He was Professor Emeritus of New Testament Exegesis since 1964[3] and Honorary Research Professor at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland. He was formerly the chair of the Tyndale Fellowship for Biblical and Theological Research. He was the author of at least 38 books and more than 120 essays and articles.[3]

Academic interests

Marshall's main interests in research were the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles, the Pastoral Epistles, and aspects of New Testament theology. He was particularly concerned with the work of Luke as both historian and theologian. He contributed to a New Testament introduction for students and edited a revision and updating of Moulton and Geden's Concordance to the Greek Testament so that it can be used with the current major editions of the Greek New Testament as well as with older editions. In 2005 his New Testament Theology was the Gold Medallion Book Award winner.[4]

Marshall was a critic of the Christ myth theory. In his book I Believe in the Historical Jesus he wrote that the idea that Jesus never existed has "failed to make any impression on scholarly opinion."[5] His contribution to the UK television miniseries Jesus: The Evidence (Channel 4: 1984) was pitted against that of sceptic, G. A. Wells, prompting Henry Chadwick, Regius Professor of Divinity at Cambridge University, to comment that the programmes "juxtaposed perfectly sensible scholarly opinions with opinions so outré and hard to defend on rational grounds that disservice was done to the sensible people by the company they were portrayed as keeping".[6]

Marshall had an Arminian theology. With Arminius, he believed that unlimited atonement is consistent with penal substitution.[7] In Kept by the Power of God (1969),[8] Marshall mentioned the possibility of apostasy. He preferred the view of conditional security for having fewer exegetical difficulties, point that was added eventually in an epilogue of Kept by the power of God (1995).[9][10]

Publications
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1968). Bible Study Books - St. Mark. London: Scripture Union.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1969). Kept by the power of God : a study of perseverance and falling away. London: Epworth Publishing.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1970). Luke: Historian and Theologian. Exeter: Paternoster Press.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1976). The Origins of New Testament Christology. Illinois: Intervarsity Press.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1977). New Testament Interpretation. Exeter: Paternoster Press.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1978). The Gospel of Luke (NIGTC). Exeter: Paternoster Press.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1977). I Believe in the Historical Jesus. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1978). The Epistles of John (NICNT). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1980). The Acts of the Apostles. Leicester: IVP.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1980). Last Supper and Lord's Supper. Exeter: Paternoster Press.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1983). 1 and 2 Thessalonians (NCB). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1990). Jesus the Saviour: Studies in New Testament Theology. London: SPCK.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1991). 1 Peter (IVP Commentary Series). Leicester: IVP.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1992). The Epistle to the Philippians. London: Epworth Press.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (1993). The Theology of the Shorter Pauline Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Marshall, I. Howard; Peterson, D. (1998). Witness to the Gospel: The Theology of the Book of Acts. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
  • Marshall, I. Howard; Towner, Philip H. (1999). A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on The Pastoral Epistles. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (2002). Concordance to the Greek New Testament. London: T&T Clark.
  • Marshall, I. Howard; Travis, Stephen; Paul, Ian (2002). Exploring the New Testament. 2. London: SPCK.
  • Marshall, I. Howard; Vanhoozer, Kevin J.; Porter, Stanley E. (2004). Beyond the Bible: Moving from Scripture to Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (2004). New Testament Theology: Many Witnesses, One Gospel. Downers Grove: Inter-Varsity Press.
  • Marshall, I. Howard (2007). Aspects of Atonement. London: Paternoster Press.

Notes and references

Citations
  1. Oxford University Press 2019.
  2. Evangel Seminary 2009, Dr. Maureen YEUNG MARSHALL（2004年 至 2013年）.
  3. Bock 2008.
  4. ECPA 2019.
  5. Marshall 2004, p. 16.
  6. Wallis 2016, p. 678.
  7. Marshall 2005.
  8. Marshall 1969.
  9. Perkins & Marshall 1987, conclusion. [The non-Calvinist view] is also problematic because it appears to question the absolute power of God, but it has perhaps fewer exegetical difficulties, since it does not require us to give an artificial interpretation of such passages as those cited from Hebrews above.
  10. Oropeza 2000, p. 33. "[...] Marshall's view [on apostasy] falls much in line with the Arminian Tradition"

Sources
gollark: The important thing is probably... quantitative data about the amounts and change of each?
gollark: Regardless of what's actually happening with news, you can probably dredge up a decent amount of examples of people complaining about being too censored *and* the other way round.
gollark: With the butterfly-weather-control example that's derived from, you can't actually track every butterfly and simulate the air movements resulting from this (yet, with current technology and algorithms), but you can just assume some amount of random noise (from that and other sources) which make predictions about the weather unreliable over large time intervals.
gollark: That seems nitpicky, the small stuff is still *mostly* irrelevant because you can lump it together or treat it as noise.
gollark: Why are you invoking the butterfly effect here?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.