Husayn Pasha ibn Makki

Husayn Pasha ibn Makki (Arabic: حسين باشا بن مكي, romanized: Ḥusayn Bāshā ibn Makkī; known in Turkish as Mekkizâde Hüseyin Paşa) (died 1765) served as the Ottoman wali (provincial governor) of Damascus (1757) and Marash (1762), and the sanjak-bey (district governor) of his native Gaza (1763–1765).

Husayn Pasha ibn Makki
MonarchOsman III (1754-1757)
Mustafa III (1757-1774)
Abdul Hamid I (1774-1789)
Wali of Damascus
In office
25 February 1757  December 1757
Preceded byAs'ad Pasha al-Azm
Succeeded byÇeteci Abdullah Pasha
Wali of Marash
In office
1762–1762
Sanjak-Bey of Gaza
In office
1763–1765
Personal details
BornGaza, Damascus Eyalet, Ottoman Empire
Died1765
Gaza region, Damascus Eyalet, Ottoman Empire
NationalityOttoman

Origins

Husayn Pasha ibn Makki was an Arab from Gaza, and one of the few ethnic Arab governors (the other Arab governors were mostly members of the al-Azm family) who had governed Ottoman Damascus.[1] Husayn's grandfather was a native and merchant of Gaza.[2] Husayn's father Muhammad served as a one-time kahya (steward) for As'ad Pasha al-Azm, the governor of Damascus Eyalet (Province of Damascus), and was granted the malikane (a type of ownership) of Gaza Sanjak, a district of Damascus Eyalet.[2]

Governor of Damascus

Husayn Pasha was appointed Governor of Damascus in February 1757 to replace the deposed long-time governor, As'ad Pasha al-Azm. His term in office was short-lived and marked by chaos and violence in the city of Damascus. As he entered office on 25 February a price hike for bread in the city spiked due to the short supply of grain as a result of the severe winter that preceded his rule. A popular uprising protesting the prices took place in the city. Damascene notables heading to Husayn Pasha's residence to welcome him were assaulted by some protesters and vocally condemned for alleged grain hoarding and "exploiting the poor and miserable".[3][2] Husayn Pasha responded by ordering an investigation and soon after the prices decreased and calm was restored. However, this was short-lived and the prices rose within a few months. In the summer of 1757, mass violence spread throughout Damascus as rival factions of Jannisaries fought each other and besieged rival neighborhoods, while a popular revolt caused many mercenaries stationed in the city to flee.[3]

Assault of the Hajj caravan

As Governor of Damascus, Husayn Pasha was also the amir al-hajj (commander of the annual Hajj pilgrim caravan to Mecca). In April 1757, he went on a tour of the province's villages to collect the taxes imposed for funding the supply and protection of the caravan, and in June he led the caravan in its departure from Damascus.[4] Husayn Pasha led it safely to Mecca, but on the return to Damascus, the caravan's jurdah (advance guard) was assaulted by a coalition of Bedouin tribes led Qa'dan al-Fa'iz of the Bani Sakhr in al-Qatranah near al-Karak. Its commander Musa Pasha was wounded and died seeking help in Daraa, while most of the jurdah dispersed, fleeing to Hauran, Gaza, Jerusalem or Ma'an. Reinforcements were sent from Damascus, but went no further than al-Balqa. When Husayn Pasha, now in the northern Hejaz, realized reinforcements were not arriving, he attempted to bribe al-Fa'iz, but to no avail. The Bedouin tribes launched a massive assault against the caravan south of Tabuk in October, looting it and massacred Muslim pilgrims, including the sister of Ottoman sultan Osman II, in the process.[5] About 20,000 pilgrims were killed by the Bedouin or died of thirst or excessive heat.[6]

There were various reasons the Bedouin launched the assault, but the main reason was the financial gain they saw in looting the caravan to compensate for the loss of much of their territory and income to the Anizzah tribes of Najd, who invaded much of the Syrian Desert in the years prior. Prior to making the Hajj, Husayn Pasha refused to pay the traditional protection fee to the Bani Saqr, paying the Anizzah instead. However, Husayn Pasha held the autonomous Arab ruler of northern Palestine, Zahir al-Umar, as culpable. Husayn Pasha saw it as a priority to subdue Zahir and annex his territories (which were part of Sidon Eyalet) and believed Zahir, who maintained close ties with the Bani Saqr, incited the Bedouin tribes to raid the caravan. Zahir denied the allegation and purchased the looted goods, including Sultan Osman III's decorated banner, in order to return them to the sultanate and prove his loyalty.[7] The Ottoman authorities remained suspicious of Zahir nonetheless,[8] and also believed that ex-governor As'ad Pasha had a hand in the raid since no attacks against the caravan had occurred during his 15-year governorship. The latter was arrested and was executed on the way to a prison in Crete.[9]

Husayn Pasha did not return to Damascus with the surviving pilgrims and his absence left a political void in the city. The yerliyya Jannisaries revolted, causing businesses in Damascus to shutter and prices of bread to more than double, leading to more riots in the city.[3] As a result of his failure to protect the caravan, Husayn Pasha was dismissed from office by the end of the year.[8]

Later career

Husayn Pasha was exiled to his native Gaza after his dismissal,[6] but was later assigned Governor of Marash Eyalet in Anatolia in 1762. He served there for less than a year before being appointed sanjak-bey (district governor) of Gaza.[6] He served as Governor of Gaza until he was killed in a confrontation with the Bani Sakhr and Wuhaydat tribes[8] in Gaza's general vicinity in 1765.[6]

gollark: Want another?
gollark: See, this is perfect and without flaw except that the time requirement to make the regex seems to increase exponentially due to greenery.
gollark: Here you go, `b(d(e(e(io|oi)|i(eo|oe)|o(ei|ie))|i(e(eo|oe)|oe{2})|o(e(ei|ie)|ie{2}))|e(d(e(io|oi)|i(eo|oe)|o(ei|ie))|e(d(io|oi)|i(do|od)|o(di|id))|i(d(eo|oe)|e(do|od)|o(de|ed))|o(d(ei|ie)|e(di|id)|i(de|ed)))|i(d(e(eo|oe)|oe{2})|e(d(eo|oe)|e(do|od)|o(de|ed))|o(de{2}|e(de|ed)))|o(d(e(ei|ie)|ie{2})|e(d(ei|ie)|e(di|id)|i(de|ed))|i(de{2}|e(de|ed))))|d(b(e(e(io|oi)|i(eo|oe)|o(ei|ie))|i(e(eo|oe)|oe{2})|o(e(ei|ie)|ie{2}))|e(b(e(io|oi)|i(eo|oe)|o(ei|ie))|e(b(io|oi)|i(bo|ob)|o(bi|ib))|i(b(eo|oe)|e(bo|ob)|o(be|eb))|o(b(ei|ie)|e(bi|ib)|i(be|eb)))|i(b(e(eo|oe)|oe{2})|e(b(eo|oe)|e(bo|ob)|o(be|eb))|o(be{2}|e(be|eb)))|o(b(e(ei|ie)|ie{2})|e(b(ei|ie)|e(bi|ib)|i(be|eb))|i(be{2}|e(be|eb))))|e(b(d(e(io|oi)|i(eo|oe)|o(ei|ie))|e(d(io|oi)|i(do|od)|o(di|id))|i(d(eo|oe)|e(do|od)|o(de|ed))|o(d(ei|ie)|e(di|id)|i(de|ed)))|d(b(e(io|oi)|i(eo|oe)|o(ei|ie))|e(b(io|oi)|i(bo|ob)|o(bi|ib))|i(b(eo|oe)|e(bo|ob)|o(be|eb))|o(b(ei|ie)|e(bi|ib)|i(be|eb)))|e(b(d(io|oi)|i(do|od)|o(di|id))|d(b(io|oi)|i(bo|ob)|o(bi|ib))|i(b(do|od)|d(bo|ob)|o(bd|db))|o(b(di|id)|d(bi|ib)|i(bd|db)))|i(b(d(eo|oe)|e(do|od)|o(de|ed))|d(b(eo|oe)|e(bo|ob)|o(be|eb))|e(b(do|od)|d(bo|ob)|o(bd|db))|o(b(de|ed)|d(be|eb)|e(bd|db)))|o(b(d(ei|ie)|e(di|id)|i(de|ed))|d(b(ei|ie)|e(bi|ib)|i(be|eb))|e(b(di|id)|d(bi|ib)|i(bd|db))|i(b(de|ed)|d(be|eb)|e(bd|db))))|i(b(d(e(eo|oe)|oe{2})|e(d(eo|oe)|e(do|od)|o(de|ed))|o(de{2}|e(de|ed)))|d(b(e(eo|oe)|oe{2})|e(b(eo|oe)|e(bo|ob)|o(be|eb))|o(be{2}|e(be|eb)))|e(b(d(eo|oe)|e(do|od)|o(de|ed))|d(b(eo|oe)|e(bo|ob)|o(be|eb))|e(b(do|od)|d(bo|ob)|o(bd|db))|o(b(de|ed)|d(be|eb)|e(bd|db)))|o(b(de{2}|e(de|ed))|d(be{2}|e(be|eb))|e(b(de|ed)|d(be|eb)|e(bd|db))))|o(b(d(e(ei|ie)|ie{2})|e(d(ei|ie)|e(di|id)|i(de|ed))|i(de{2}|e(de|ed)))|d(b(e(ei|ie)|ie{2})|e(b(ei|ie)|e(bi|ib)|i(be|eb))|i(be{2}|e(be|eb)))|e(b(d(ei|ie)|e(di|id)|i(de|ed))|d(b(ei|ie)|e(bi|ib)|i(be|eb))|e(b(di|id)|d(bi|ib)|i(bd|db))|i(b(de|ed)|d(be|eb)|e(bd|db)))|i(b(de{2}|e(de|ed))|d(be{2}|e(be|eb))|e(b(de|ed)|d(be|eb)|e(bd|db))))` matches all anagrams of `beeoid`.
gollark: I'll run that test later™, I have to test my new `beeoid` anagram regex.
gollark: I don't think it's an optimal regex, but it's generated from the FSM.

References

  1. JCAS Symposium Series, Japan Center for Area Studies, National Museum of Ethnology, 2003, ISBN 9784901838023
  2. Rafeq 1966, p. 208.
  3. Grehan 2007, p. 90.
  4. Joudah 1987, p. 39.
  5. Joudah 1987, p. 40.
  6. Barbir 2014, p. 30.
  7. Joudah 1987, p. 41.
  8. Joudah 1987, p. 42.
  9. Joudah 1987, p. 43.

Bibliography

Regnal titles
Preceded by
As'ad Pasha al-Azm
Wali of Damascus
1757-1757
Succeeded by
Çeteci Abdullah Pasha
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.