Human epigenome

Human epigenome is the complete set of structural modifications of chromatin and chemical modifications of histones and nucleotides (such as cytosine methylation). These modifications affect gene expression according to cellular type and development status. Various studies show that epigenome depends on exogenous factors.

Chemical modifications

Different types of chemical modifications exist and the ChIP-seq experimental procedure can be performed in order to study them. The epigenetic profiles of human tissues reveals the following distinct histone modifications in different functional areas:[1]

Active Promoters Active Enhancers Transcribed Gene Bodies Silenced Regions
H3K4me3 H3K4me1 H3K36me3 H3K27me3
H3K27ac H3K27ac H3K9me3

Methylation

DNA functionally interacts with a variety of epigenetic marks, such as cytosine methylation, also known as 5-methylcytosine (5mC). This epigenetic mark is widely conserved and plays major roles in the regulation of gene expression, in the silencing of transposable elements and repeat sequences.[2]

Individuals differ with their epigenetic profile, for example the variance in CpG methylation among individuals is about 42%. On the contrary, epigenetic profile (including methylation profile) of each individual is constant over the course of a year, reflecting the constancy of our phenotype and metabolic traits. Methylation profile, in particular, is quite stable in a 12-month period and appears to change more over decades.[3]

Methylation sites

CoRSIVs are correlated regions of systemic interindividual variation in DNA methylation. They span only 0.1% of the human genome, so they are very rare; they can be inter-correlated over long genomic distances (>50 kbp). CoRSIVs are also associated with genes involved in a lot of human disorders, including tumors, mental disorders and cardiovascular diseases. It has been observed that disease-associated CpG sites are 37% enriched in CoRSIVs compared to control regions and 53% enriched in CoRSIVs relative to tDMRs (tissue specific Differentially Methylated Regions).[4]

Most of the CoRSIVs are only 200 – 300 bp long and include 5–10 CpG dinucleotides, the largest span several kb and involve hundreds of CpGs. These regions tend to occur in clusters and the two genomic areas of high CoRSIV density are observed at the major histocompatibility (MHC) locus on chromosome 6 and at the pericentromeric region on the long arm of chromosome 20.[4]

CoRSIVs are enriched in intergenic and quiescent regions (e.g. subtelomeric regions) and contain many transposable elements, but few CpG islands (CGI) and transcription factor binding sites. CoRSIVs are under-represented in the proximity of genes, in heterochromatic regions, active promoters, and enhancers. They are also usually not present in highly conserved genomic regions.[4]

CoRSIVs can have a useful application: measurements of CoRSIV methylation in one tissue can provide some information about epigenetic regulation in other tissues, indeed we can predict the expression of associated genes because systemic epigenetic variants are generally consistent in all tissues and cell types.[5]

Factors affecting methylation pattern

Quantification of the heritable basis underlying population epigenomic variation is also important to delineate its cis- and trans-regulatory architecture. In particular, most studies state that inter-individual differences in DNA methylation are mainly determined by cis-regulatory sequence polymorphisms, probably involving mutations in TFBSs (Transcription Factor Binding Sites) with downstream consequences on local chromatin environment. The sparsity of trans-acting polymorphisms in humans suggests that such effects are highly deleterious. Indeed, trans-acting factors are expected to be caused by mutations in chromatin control genes or other highly pleiotropic regulators. If trans-acting variants do exist in human populations, they probably segregate as rare alleles or originate from somatic mutations and present with clinical phenotypes, as is the case in many cancers.[2]

Correlation between methylation and gene expression

DNA methylation (in particular in CpG regions) is able to affect gene expression: hypermethylated regions tend to be differentially expressed. In fact, people with a similar methylation profile tend to also have the same transcriptome. Moreover, one key observation from human methylation is that most functionally relevant changes in CpG methylation occur in regulatory elements, such as enhancers.

Anyway, differential expression concerns only a slight number of methylated genes: only one fifth of genes with CpG methylation shows variable expression according to their methylation state. It is important to notice that methylation is not the only factor affecting gene regulation.[3]

Methylation in embryos

It was revealed by immunostaining experiments that in human preimplantation embryos there is a global DNA demethylation process. After fertilisation, the DNA methylation level decreases sharply in the early pronuclei. This is a consequence of active DNA demethylation at this stage. But global demethylation is not an irreversible process, in fact de novo methylation occurring from the early to mid-pronuclear stage and from the 4-cell to the 8-cell stage.[6]

The percentage of DNA methylation is different in oocytes and in sperm: the mature oocyte has an intermediate level of DNA methylation (72%), instead the sperm has high level of DNA methylation (86%). Demethylation in paternal genome occurs quickly after fertilisation, whereas the maternal genome is quite resistant at the demethylation process at this stage. Maternal different methylated regions (DMRs) are more resistant to the preimplantation demethylation wave.[6]

CpG methylation is similar in germinal vesicle (GV) stage, intermediate metaphase I (MI) stage and mature metaphase II (MII) stage. Non-CpG methylation continues to accumulate in these stages.[6]

Chromatin accessibility in germline was evaluated by different approaches, like scATAC-seq and sciATAC-seq, scCOOL-seq, scNOMe-seq and scDNase-seq. Stage-specific proximal and distal regions with accessible chromatin regions were identified. Global chromatin accessibility is found to gradually decrease from the zygote to the 8-cell stage and then increase. Parental allele-specific analysis shows that paternal genome becomes more open than the maternal genome from the late zygote stage to the 4-cell stage, which may reflect decondensation of the paternal genome with replacement of protamines by histones.[6]

Sequence-Dependent Allele-Specific Methylation

DNA methylation imbalances between homologous chromosomes show sequence-dependent behavior. Difference in the methylation state of neighboring cytosines on the same chromosome occurs due to the difference in DNA sequence between the chromosomes. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) is used to explore sequence-dependent allele-specific methylation (SD-ASM) at a single-chromosome resolution level and comprehensive whole-genome coverage. The results of WGBS tested on 49 methylomes revealed CpG methylation imbalances exceeding 30% differences in 5% of the loci.[7]

On the sites of gene regulatory loci bound by transcription factors the random switching between methylated and unmethylated states of DNA was observed. This is also referred as stochastic switching and it is linked to selective buffering of gene regulatory circuit against mutations and genetic diseases. Only rare genetic variants show the stochastic type of gene regulation.

The study made by Onuchic et al. was aimed to construct the maps of allelic imbalances in DNA methylation, gene transcription, and also of histone modifications. 36 cell and tissue types from 13 participant donors were used to examine 71 epigenomes. The results of WGBS tested on 49 methylomes revealed CpG methylation imbalances exceeding 30% differences in 5% of the loci. The stochastic switching occurred at thousands of heterozygous regulatory loci that were bound to transcription factors. The intermediate methylation state is referred to the relative frequencies between methylated and unmethylated epialleles. The epiallele frequency variations are correlated with the allele affinity for transcription factors.

The analysis of the study suggests that human epigenome in average covers approximately 200 adverse SD-ASM variants. The sensitivity of the genes with tissue-specific expression patterns gives the opportunity for the evolutionary innovation in gene regulation.[7]

Haplotype reconstruction strategy is used to trace chromatin chemical modifications (using ChIP-seq) in a variety of human tissues. Haplotype-resolved epigenomic maps can trace allelic biases in chromatin configuration. A substantial variation among different tissues and individuals is observed. This allows the deeper understanding of cis-regulatory relationships between genes and control sequences.[1]

Structural modifications

During the last few years, several methods have been developed to study the structural and consequently the functional modifications of chromatin. The first project that used epigenomic profiling to identify regulatory elements in the human genome was ENCODE (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements) that focused on profiling histone modifications on cell lines. A few years later ENCODE was included in the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IHEC), which aims to coordinate international epigenome studies.[8]

The structural modifications that these projects aim to study can be divided into five main groups:

  • Nucleosome occupancy to detect regions with regulatory genes;
  • Chromatin interactions and domains;[8]

Topological associated domains (TADs)

Topological associated domains are a degree of structural organization of the genome of the cell. They are formed by regions of chromatin, sized from 100 kilobases up to megabases, which highly self-interact. The domains are linked by other genomic regions, which, based on their size, are either called “topological boundary regions” or “unorganized chromatin”. These boundary regions separate the topological domains from heterochromatin, and prevent the amplification of the latter. Topological domains are diffused in mammalian, although similar genome partitions were identified also in Drosophila.[9]

Topological domains in humans, like in other mammalians, have many functions regarding gene expression and transcriptional control process. Inside these domains, the chromatin shows to be well tangled, while in the boundary regions chromatin interactions are far less present.[10] These boundary areas in particular show some peculiarity that determine the functions of all the topological domains.

Firstly, they contain insulator regions and barrier elements, both of which function as inhibitors of further transcription from the RNA polymerase enzyme.[11] Such elements are characterized by the massive presence of insulator binding proteins CTCF.

Secondly, boundary regions block heterochromatin spreading, thus preventing the loss of useful genetic informations. This information derives from the observation that the heterochromatin mark H3K9me3 sequences clearly interrupts near boundary sequences.[12]

Thirdly, transcription start sites (TSS), housekeeping genes and tRNA genes are particularly abundant in boundary regions, denoting that those areas have a prolific transcriptional activity, thanks to their structural characteristics, different from other topological regions.[13][14]

Finally, in the border areas of the topological domains and their surroundings there is an enrichment of Alu/B1 and B2 SINE retrotransposons. In the recent years, those sequences were referred to alter binding site of CTCF, thus interfering with expression of some genomic areas.[15]

Further proofs towards a role in genetic modulation and transcription regulation refers to the great conservation of the boundary pattern across mammalian evolution, with a dynamic range of small diversities inside different cell types, suggesting that these topological domains take part in cell-type specific regulatory events.[10]

Correlation between methylation and 3D structure

The 4D Nucleome project aims to realize a 3D maps of mammalian genomes in order to develop predictive models to correlate epigenomic modifications with genetic variation. In particular the goal is to link genetic and epigenomic modifications with the enhancers and promoters which they interact with in three-dimensional space, thus discovering gene-set interactomes and pathways as new candidates for functional analysis and therapeutic targeting.

Hi-C [16] is an experimental method used to map the connections between DNA fragments in three-dimensional space on a genome-wide scale. This technique combines chemical crosslinking of chromatin with restriction enzyme digestion and next-generation DNA sequencing.[17]

This kind of studies are currently limited by the lack or unavailability of raw data.[8]

gollark: All emojis should be replaced with 🿿.
gollark: ÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆA
gollark: Really a marketing letdown, honestly?
gollark: ... no.
gollark: There's not really much of a conveniently recognizable capitalism symbol.

See also

References
  1. Leung, Danny; Jung, Inkyung; Rajagopal, Nisha; Schmitt, Anthony; Selvaraj, Siddarth; Lee, Ah Young; Yen, Chia-An; Lin, Shin; Lin, Yiing; Qiu, Yunjiang; Xie, Wei (2015-02-19). "Integrative analysis of haplotype-resolved epigenomes across human tissues". Nature. 518 (7539): 350–354. Bibcode:2015Natur.518..350L. doi:10.1038/nature14217. ISSN 0028-0836. PMC 4449149. PMID 25693566.
  2. Taudt, Aaron; Colomé-Tatché, Maria; Johannes, Frank (2016-05-09). "Genetic sources of population epigenomic variation". Nature Reviews Genetics. 17 (6): 319–332. doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.45. ISSN 1471-0056. PMID 27156976.
  3. Tabassum, Rubina; Sivadas, Ambily; Agrawal, Vartika; Tian, Haozheng; Arafat, Dalia; Gibson, Greg (2015-08-13). "Omic personality: implications of stable transcript and methylation profiles for personalized medicine". Genome Medicine. 7 (1): 88. doi:10.1186/s13073-015-0209-4. ISSN 1756-994X. PMC 4578259. PMID 26391122.
  4. Gunasekara, Chathura J.; Scott, C. Anthony; Laritsky, Eleonora; Baker, Maria S.; MacKay, Harry; Duryea, Jack D.; Kessler, Noah J.; Hellenthal, Garrett; Wood, Alexis C.; Hodges, Kelly R.; Gandhi, Manisha (2019-06-03). "A genomic atlas of systemic interindividual epigenetic variation in humans". Genome Biology. 20 (1): 105. doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1708-1. ISSN 1474-760X. PMC 6545702. PMID 31155008.
  5. Waterland, Robert A.; Michels, Karin B. (2007). "Epigenetic Epidemiology of the Developmental Origins Hypothesis". Annual Review of Nutrition. 27 (1): 363–388. doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093705. PMID 17465856.
  6. Wen, Lu; Tang, Fuchou (2019-10-17). "Human Germline Cell Development: from the Perspective of Single-Cell Sequencing". Molecular Cell. 76 (2): 320–328. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.08.025. ISSN 1097-2765. PMID 31563431.
  7. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biology Altshuler, Robert Charles Onuchic, Vitor Lurie, Eugene Carrero, Ivenise Pawliczek, Piotr Patel, Ronak Y. Rozowsky, Joel Galeev, Timur Huang, Zhuoyi Harris, R. Alan Coarfa, Cristian Ashmore, Lillian Bertol, Jessica W. Fakhouri, Walid D. Yu, Fuli Kellis, Manolis Gerstein, Mark Milosavljevic, Aleksandar (2019-06-07). Allele-specific epigenome maps reveal sequence-dependent stochastic switching at regulatory loci. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). OCLC 1113934887.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. Stricker, Stefan H.; Köferle, Anna; Beck, Stephan (January 2017). "From profiles to function in epigenomics". Nature Reviews Genetics. 18 (1): 51–66. doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.138. ISSN 1471-0064. PMID 27867193.
  9. Sexton, Tom; Yaffe, Eitan; Kenigsberg, Ephraim; Bantignies, Frédéric; Leblanc, Benjamin; Hoichman, Michael; Parrinello, Hugues; Tanay, Amos; Cavalli, Giacomo (2012-02-03). "Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome". Cell. 148 (3): 458–472. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010. ISSN 1097-4172. PMID 22265598.
  10. Dixon, Jesse R.; Selvaraj, Siddarth; Yue, Feng; Kim, Audrey; Li, Yan; Shen, Yin; Hu, Ming; Liu, Jun S.; Ren, Bing (2012-04-11). "Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions". Nature. 485 (7398): 376–380. Bibcode:2012Natur.485..376D. doi:10.1038/nature11082. ISSN 1476-4687. PMC 3356448. PMID 22495300.
  11. Kim, Y. J.; Cecchini, K. R.; Kim, T. H. (2011-05-03). "Conserved, developmentally regulated mechanism couples chromosomal looping and heterochromatin barrier activity at the homeobox gene A locus". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (18): 7391–7396. Bibcode:2011PNAS..108.7391K. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018279108. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3088595. PMID 21502535.
  12. Hawkins, R. David; Hon, Gary C.; Lee, Leonard K.; Ngo, Queminh; Lister, Ryan; Pelizzola, Mattia; Edsall, Lee E.; Kuan, Samantha; Luu, Ying; Klugman, Sarit; Antosiewicz-Bourget, Jessica (2010-05-07). "Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells". Cell Stem Cell. 6 (5): 479–491. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.03.018. ISSN 1875-9777. PMC 2867844. PMID 20452322.
  13. Min, Irene M.; Waterfall, Joshua J.; Core, Leighton J.; Munroe, Robert J.; Schimenti, John; Lis, John T. (2011-04-01). "Regulating RNA polymerase pausing and transcription elongation in embryonic stem cells". Genes & Development. 25 (7): 742–754. doi:10.1101/gad.2005511. ISSN 1549-5477. PMC 3070936. PMID 21460038.
  14. Ebersole, Thomas; Kim, Jung-Hyun; Samoshkin, Alexander; Kouprina, Natalay; Pavlicek, Adam; White, Robert J.; Larionov, Vladimir (2011-08-15). "tRNA genes protect a reporter gene from epigenetic silencing in mouse cells". Cell Cycle. 10 (16): 2779–2791. doi:10.4161/cc.10.16.17092. ISSN 1551-4005. PMC 3219543. PMID 21822054.
  15. Schmidt, Dominic; Schwalie, Petra C.; Wilson, Michael D.; Ballester, Benoit; Gonçalves, Angela; Kutter, Claudia; Brown, Gordon D.; Marshall, Aileen; Flicek, Paul; Odom, Duncan T. (2012-01-20). "Waves of retrotransposon expansion remodel genome organization and CTCF binding in multiple mammalian lineages". Cell. 148 (1–2): 335–348. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.058. ISSN 1097-4172. PMC 3368268. PMID 22244452.
  16. Kumasaka, Natsuhiko; Knights, Andrew J.; Gaffney, Daniel J. (January 2019). "High-resolution genetic mapping of putative causal interactions between regions of open chromatin". Nature Genetics. 51 (1): 128–137. doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0278-6. ISSN 1546-1718. PMC 6330062. PMID 30478436.
  17. Eagen, Kyle P. (June 2018). "Principles of Chromosome Architecture Revealed by Hi-C". Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 43 (6): 469–478. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2018.03.006. PMC 6028237. PMID 29685368.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.