Heartwell, Nebraska

Heartwell is a village in Kearney County, Nebraska, United States. It is part of the Kearney, Nebraska Micropolitan Statistical Area. The population was 71 at the 2010 census.

Heartwell, Nebraska
Heartwell, Main Street
Location of Heartwell, Nebraska
Coordinates: 40°34′12″N 98°47′23″W
CountryUnited States
StateNebraska
CountyKearney
Area
  Total0.07 sq mi (0.19 km2)
  Land0.07 sq mi (0.19 km2)
  Water0.00 sq mi (0.00 km2)
Elevation
2,093 ft (638 m)
Population
  Total71
  Estimate 
(2019)[3]
69
  Density945.21/sq mi (367.22/km2)
Time zoneUTC-6 (Central (CST))
  Summer (DST)UTC-5 (CDT)
ZIP code
68945
Area code(s)308
FIPS code31-21835[4]
GNIS feature ID0829907[5]

History

Heartwell was established circa 1883 when the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad was extended to that point.[6][7] It was named for James B. Heartwell, a politician and bank official.[7][8]

Geography

Heartwell is located at 40°34′12″N 98°47′23″W (40.569993, -98.789765).[9]

According to the United States Census Bureau, the village has a total area of 0.07 square miles (0.18 km2), all land.[10]

Demographics

Historical population
CensusPop.
1920140
193018230.0%
1940141−22.5%
1950125−11.3%
1960113−9.6%
1970104−8.0%
198087−16.3%
199069−20.7%
20008015.9%
201071−11.2%
Est. 201969[3]−2.8%
U.S. Decennial Census[11]

2010 census

As of the census[2] of 2010, there were 71 people, 28 households, and 21 families living in the village. The population density was 1,014.3 inhabitants per square mile (391.6/km2). There were 33 housing units at an average density of 471.4 per square mile (182.0/km2). The racial makeup of the village was 88.7% White, 8.5% from other races, and 2.8% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 18.3% of the population.

There were 28 households, of which 35.7% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 57.1% were married couples living together, 14.3% had a female householder with no husband present, 3.6% had a male householder with no wife present, and 25.0% were non-families. 21.4% of all households were made up of individuals. The average household size was 2.54 and the average family size was 2.86.

The median age in the village was 37.8 years. 25.4% of residents were under the age of 18; 16.9% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 18.3% were from 25 to 44; 25.3% were from 45 to 64; and 14.1% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the village was 56.3% male and 43.7% female.

2000 census

As of the census[4] of 2000, there were 80 people, 31 households, and 23 families living in the village. The population density was 1,056.8 people per square mile (386.1/km2). There were 37 housing units at an average density of 488.8 per square mile (178.6/km2). The racial makeup of the village was 85.00% White, 11.25% from other races, and 3.75% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 17.50% of the population.

There were 31 households, out of which 38.7% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 64.5% were married couples living together, 6.5% had a female householder with no husband present, and 22.6% were non-families. 22.6% of all households were made up of individuals, and 12.9% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.58 and the average family size was 3.00.

In the village, the population was spread out, with 28.8% under the age of 18, 10.0% from 18 to 24, 32.5% from 25 to 44, 20.0% from 45 to 64, and 8.8% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 30 years. For every 100 females, there were 105.1 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.6 males.

As of 2000 the median income for a household in the village was $35,417, and the median income for a family was $41,250. Males had a median income of $27,250 versus $17,708 for females. The per capita income for the village was $16,387. None of the population and none of the families were below the poverty line.

gollark: Obviously SSD vs HDD is a big jump, but SATA is still fast enough for most consumer uses.
gollark: I've seen 4K displays and don't really care. My laptop screen is 120Hz and it is not significantly different from my 60Hz monitor, except for slightly better colours but this isn't very related. I recently got a mid-range-ish phone instead of the cheapest-available ones I usually would and it's somewhat nicer (better haptics and sensors mostly), but premium ones seem to have very diminishing returns from the ones I've interacted with. I've tried a few mechanical keyboards and they don't seem significantly nicer (one was even *worse* for me due to excessively tall keys/high key travel). I also have an NVMe disk and it does not feel very different to the SATA SSDs I had before.
gollark: See, even if it *was* good, you probably just get used to it and then demand higher standards forever.
gollark: Wrongness is correlated, probably.
gollark: Oh, also NVMe disks.

References

  1. "2019 U.S. Gazetteer Files". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved July 26, 2020.
  2. "U.S. Census website". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2012-06-24.
  3. "Population and Housing Unit Estimates". United States Census Bureau. May 24, 2020. Retrieved May 27, 2020.
  4. "U.S. Census website". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2008-01-31.
  5. "US Board on Geographic Names". United States Geological Survey. 2007-10-25. Retrieved 2008-01-31.
  6. Burr, George L. (1921). History of Hamilton and Clay Counties, Nebraska, Volume 1. S.J. Clarke Publishing Company. p. 122.
  7. "Heartwell, Kearney County". Center for Advanced Land Management Information Technologies. University of Nebraska. Retrieved 14 August 2014.
  8. Capace, Nancy (1999). Encyclopedia of Nebraska. North American Book Dist LLC. p. 226. ISBN 978-0-403-09834-7.
  9. "US Gazetteer files: 2010, 2000, and 1990". United States Census Bureau. 2011-02-12. Retrieved 2011-04-23.
  10. "US Gazetteer files 2010". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2012-06-24.
  11. "Census of Population and Housing". Census.gov. Retrieved June 4, 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.