Hans Driesch

Hans Adolf Eduard Driesch (28 October 1867 – 17 April 1941) was a German biologist and philosopher from Bad Kreuznach. He is most noted for his early experimental work in embryology and for his neo-vitalist philosophy of entelechy. He has also been credited with performing the first artificial 'cloning' of an animal in the 1880s, although this claim is dependent on how one defines cloning.[2]

Hans Adolf Eduard Driesch
Born28 October 1867
Bad Kreuznach
Died17 April 1941(1941-04-17) (aged 73)
Leipzig
CitizenshipGerman
Known forDevelopmental biology
Neo-vitalist philosophy of entelechy
Lebensphilosophie[1]
Equifinality
Scientific career
FieldsBiology and philosophy

Early years

Driesch was educated at the Gelehrtenschule des Johanneums. He began to study medicine in 1886 under August Weismann at the University of Freiburg. In 1887 he attended the University of Jena under Ernst Haeckel, Oscar Hertwig and Christian Ernst Stahl. In 1888 he studied physics and chemistry at the University of Munich. He received his doctorate in 1889. He travelled widely on field and study trips and lecture-tours, visiting Plymouth, India, Zurich and Leipzig where, in 1894, he published his Analytische Theorie der organischen Entwicklung or Analytic Theory of Organic Development. His interests encompassed mathematics, philosophy and physics as well as biology. He married Margarete Relfferschneidt, and the couple had two children.

Experiments in embryology

From 1891 Driesch worked in Naples at the Marine Biological Station, where until 1901 he continued to experiment and seek a theoretical formulation of his results. He enquired into classical and modern philosophy in his search for an adequate theoretical overview[3] and ended by adopting an Aristotlean teleological theory of entelechy.

Under the influence of his teacher Haeckel, Driesch had tested the mechanistic embryological theories of another of Haeckel's students, Wilhelm Roux. Driesch studied sea urchin embryos, and found that when he separated the two cells of the embryo after the first cell-division, each developed into a complete sea urchin. This was contrary to his expectation that each cell would develop into the corresponding half of the animal, a prediction based on Wilhelm Roux's earlier work with frog embryos. This also happened at the four-cell stage: entire larvae ensued from each of the four cells, albeit smaller than usual. By 1885 Driesch's experiments on the sea urchin embryo showed that it was even possible to shuffle the blastomeres of the early embryo without affecting the resulting larva.

These findings suggested that any single cell in the early embryo was capable of forming any part of the developing larva. This seemed to be an important refutation of both early preformation ideas and the later mosaic theory of Wilhelm Roux, and was to be subject to much discussion in the ensuing years. The conclusion caused friction among Driesch, Roux and Haeckel.[4] Driesch's findings brought about the adoption of the terms "totipotent" and "pluripotent" cell, referring respectively to a cell that can generate every cell in an organism and one that can generate nearly every cell.

Driesch's results were confirmed with greater precision, and the experiments extended, by Sven Hörstadius who showed that conclusions of equivalence between sea urchin embryonic cells were an over-simplification.

The philosophy of entelechy

Driesch, believing that his results compromised contemporary mechanistic theories of ontogeny, instead proposed that the autonomy of life that he deduced from this persistence of embryological development despite interferences was due to what he called entelechy, a term borrowed from Aristotle's philosophy to indicate a life force which he conceived of as psychoid or "mind-like", that is; non-spatial, intensive, and qualitative rather than spatial, extensive, and quantitative.

Driesch was awarded the chair of natural theology at the University of Aberdeen, where he delivered the Gifford Lectures in 1906 and 1908 on The Science and Philosophy of the Organism - the first comprehensive presentation of his ideas. From 1909, determined to take up a career in academic philosophy, he taught natural philosophy at the Faculty of Natural Sciences in Heidelberg, becoming extraordinary professor there. In the ensuing decade he published a complete system of philosophy in three volumes, including his fundamental Theory of Order (1912) in which he proposed a three-part "doctrine of order".

In 1919 he was ordinary professor of systematic philosophy at Cologne and in 1921 professor of philosophy at Leipzig, though he was a visiting professor in Nanjing and Beijing during 1922-23, and in 1923 he received honorable doctor's degree from National Southeastern University (later renamed National Central University and Nanjing University) where he taught for a semester. He taught at the University of Wisconsin (1926–27) and in Buenos Aires (1928). In 1933 he was removed from his Leipzig chair and prematurely placed in emeritus status by the Nazi administration,[5] the first non-Jewish academic to be thus expelled, because of his pacifism and open hostility to Nazism. He became interested in parapsychology and published on such phenomena as telepathy, clairvoyance, and telekinesis.

His concept of entelechy was criticized by the scientific community. Biologist J. W. Jenkinson wrote that Dreisch was inventing new entities "beyond necessity and the progress of science would be better served by a simpler philosophy."[6] Zoologist Herbert Spencer Jennings commented that the concept of entelechy "does not help in our understanding of matters in the least."[7]

His vitalist writings were criticized by historian Ruth Brandon for being based on a religious rather than an objective scientific standpoint.[8]

Parapsychology

Driesch developed a deep interest in Psychical Research and Parapsychology. In 1931, he published a methodology of parapsychological research (in German) and in 1933 he published a book on the topic titled Psychical Research: The Science of the Super-normal. From 1926-1927 he served as the president of the Society for Psychical Research.

Selected works

In German
  • Die Biologie als selbstständige Wissenschaft (1893)
  • Die Lokalisation morphogenetischer Vorgänge Ein Beweis vitalistischen Geschehens (1899)
  • Analytische Theorie der organischen Entwicklung (1894)
  • Der Vitalismus als Geschichte und als Lehre (1905)
  • Der Begriff der organischen Form (1919)
  • Philosophie des Organischen (4th ed. 1928)

In English
gollark: Well, yes, but then lots of programs would break.
gollark: That would be annoying and no. What I *can* do, however, is make it so that `potatOS` is there but will not show in e.g. autocomplete.
gollark: Although I could do some eldritch stuff to hide it.
gollark: And renaming `potatOS` in `_G` would break... everything?
gollark: Well, yes, but it would be hard to do those.

See also

References
  1. Thurnher, Rainer, Röd, Wolfgang and Schmidinger, Heinrich, Die Philosophie des ausgehenden 19. und des 20. Jahrhunderts: Lebensphilosophie und Existenzphilosphie, C.H.Beck, 2002, p. 378.
  2. Bellomo, Michael (2006). The stem cell divide : the facts, the fiction, and the fear driving the greatest scientific, political, and religious debate of our time. Amacom. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-8144-0881-0. . . . the popular meaning of the term 'clone' is an identical copy that has been created by some conscious design. Under this definition, the first artificially created clone was made in 1885 . . . [Footnote:] Depending on the definition used, one could argue that the experiments carried out by Hans Driesch and Hans Spemmann were not instances of true cloning, but artificial twinning.
  3. UXL online biography, accessed May 2008 at http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_gx5229/is_2003/ai_n19146146
  4. Lois N. Magner, A history of the life sciences: Third Edition, Revised and Expanded, CRC Press, 2002
  5. http://vlp.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/people/data?id=per63 Biography and bibliography] in the Virtual Laboratory of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science
  6. Jenkinson, J. W. (1911). Vitalism. The Hibbert Journal 9: 545-559.
  7. Jennings, H. S. (1907). Behavior of the Starfish, Asterias Forreri De Loriol. University of California Publications in Zoology. p. 180
  8. Brandon, Ruth. (1983). The Spiritualists: The Passion for the Occult in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. pp. 91-92. ISBN 0-297-78249-5

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.