HMS Redbridge (1804)

HMS Redbridge was the mercantile Union that the Royal Navy purchased in 1804. She wrecked at Nassau, Bahamas in November 1806.

History
United Kingdom
Name: HMS Redbridge
Acquired: 1804 by purchase
Fate: Wrecked 4 November 1806
General characteristics [1]
Tons burthen: 131 (bm)
Sail plan: Schooner
Armament: 10 guns

Career

She was registered on 10 September 1805. Lieutenant Edward Burt commissioned her.

On 11 July 1806 Redbridge was in company with the privateer Fanny when they captured the American brig Stork.[2] At some point Burt was shot through the hand while chasing a privateer into a port in Cuba.[3]

Redbridge was wrecked at Nassau on 4 November 1806.[1] She had sailed from New Providence Bahamas in company with Gipsy, but when Gipsy developed a leak the two captains decided to put in at Nassau. Redbridge anchored and Lieutenant Burt went ashore to speak with the Governor. While he was ashore the pilot and master tried to move Redbridge to a better anchorage. Redbridge hit a rock, bilged, and rolled on her side. Her masts were cut away but all that could be done was to remove her crew. Next morning Redbridge was abandoned as a wreck.[4] The subsequent court-martial exonerated Burt.[3]

Citations and references

Citations

  1. Winfield (2008), p. 369.
  2. "No. 16512". The London Gazette. 10 August 1811. p. 1577.
  3. O'Byrne (1849), p. 151.
  4. Hepper (1994), pp. 116–117.

References

  • Hepper, David J. (1994). British Warship Losses in the Age of Sail, 1650–1859. Rotherfield: Jean Boudriot. ISBN 0-948864-30-3.
  • O'Byrne, William R. (1849). A naval biographical dictionary: comprising the life and services of every living officer in Her Majesty's navy, from the rank of admiral of the fleet to that of lieutenant, inclusive. 1. London: J. Murray.
  • Winfield, Rif (2008). British Warships in the Age of Sail 1793–1817: Design, Construction, Careers and Fates. Seaforth Publishing. ISBN 1-86176-246-1.
gollark: You just spoke of the t[REDACTED]n so you *must* now if you do become an admin.
gollark: You totally can. Add a bot and make it do it.
gollark: It is definitely a permission problem. Roles which grant permissions should be labeled that way.
gollark: Merry birthday™™™!
gollark: > I think making all role editing go through pyrobot is a disaster waiting to happenThe worst that could happen is that PyroBot goes rogue and begins manipulating the server to take over the world.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.