Group with operators

In abstract algebra, a branch of mathematics, the algebraic structure group with operators or Ω-group can be viewed as a group with a set Ω that operates on the elements of the group in a special way.

Groups with operators were extensively studied by Emmy Noether and her school in the 1920s. She employed the concept in her original formulation of the three Noether isomorphism theorems.

Definition

A group with operators can be defined[1] as a group together with an action of a set on :

that is distributive relative to the group law:

For each , the application is then an endomorphism of G. From this, it results that a Ω-group can also be viewed as a group G with an indexed family of endomorphisms of G.

is called the operator domain. The associate endomorphisms[2] are called the homotheties of G.

Given two groups G, H with same operator domain , a homomorphism of groups with operators is a group homomorphism satisfying

for all and

A subgroup S of G is called a stable subgroup, -subgroup or -invariant subgroup if it respects the homotheties, that is

for all and

Category-theoretic remarks

In category theory, a group with operators can be defined[3] as an object of a functor category GrpM where M is a monoid (i.e. a category with one object) and Grp denotes the category of groups. This definition is equivalent to the previous one, provided is a monoid (otherwise we may expand it to include the identity and all compositions).

A morphism in this category is a natural transformation between two functors (i.e. two groups with operators sharing same operator domain M). Again we recover the definition above of a homomorphism of groups with operators (with f the component of the natural transformation).

A group with operators is also a mapping

where is the set of group endomorphisms of G.

Examples

Applications

The Jordan–Hölder theorem also holds in the context of operator groups. The requirement that a group have a composition series is analogous to that of compactness in topology, and can sometimes be too strong a requirement. It is natural to talk about "compactness relative to a set", i.e. talk about composition series where each (normal) subgroup is an operator-subgroup relative to the operator set X, of the group in question.

gollark: None are safe.
gollark: I have memetic irony shields.
gollark: ++delete palaiologos (imperative heresy)?
gollark: Um.
gollark: ++delete <@356107472269869058> (imperative heresy?)

See also

  • Group action

Notes

  1. Bourbaki 1974, p. 31.
  2. Bourbaki 1974, pp. 30–31.
  3. Mac Lane 1998, p. 41.

References

  • Bourbaki, Nicolas (1974). Elements of Mathematics : Algebra I Chapters 1–3. Hermann. ISBN 2-7056-5675-8.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Bourbaki, Nicolas (1998). Elements of Mathematics : Algebra I Chapters 1–3. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-64243-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Mac Lane, Saunders (1998). Categories for the Working Mathematician. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-98403-8.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.