Gavril Istrati

Gavril Istrati, or Istrate (fl. 1800–1840), was a Moldavian boyar who mounted military resistance to the Filiki Eteria during the Greek War of Independence. Probably hailing from the yeomanry, he became a Paharnic in Botoșani city, near Moldavia's border with the Austrian Empire. An exponent of Romanian nationalism and a presumed ally of the Austrians, he participated in the boyar conspiracy which liberated Botoșani County, though his troops disbanded without making further gains; his effort matched a similar counter-rebellion in neighboring Wallachia.

Istrati spent the rest of his life in Botoșani. He was the father of politician and writer Nicolae Istrati, best known as the proponent of conservatism and Moldavian separatism during the United Principalities regime. Through him, the Istratis preserved their connections with Austria into the Crimean War and after. Another son, Manolachi (Meletie) Istrati, embraced a career in the Moldavian Orthodox Church, but assisted Nicolae in his intrigues. The brothers' agenda acquired a visual representation in monuments they erected at Rotopănești.

Biography

The Istratis, who belonged to the middle stratum of Moldavian boyardom, claimed descent from Eustratie Dabija, who had occupied the Moldavian throne in the 1660s;[1] other accounts suggest that they were yeomen (răzeși), with Gavril and his brother, Constantin and Iancu, being the first Istratis to receive boyar titles and manorial estates.[2] From the early 18th century, Moldavia and Wallachia (the Danubian Principalities), were placed under a tighter control by the Ottoman Empire, exercised through the Greek-speaking Phanariotes. A Romanian by birth, Gavril reached political prominence in 1814, when he was made Paharnic of the Moldavian court.[3] In 1816, he was also a Stolnic,[4] and, by 1820, was registered among the tax exempt nobility of Botoșani.[5]

The following year, Alexander Ypsilantis' Eteria sparked the fight for Greek independence by invading Moldavia from the Russian Empire, chasing away its Prince, Michael Soutzos. Even before his takeover of Iași, he was met with the refusal of many boyars to even recognize him. A delegation was sent to İbrail, openly asking for the Ottoman Army to intervene and chase out the Eterists. Following this, a false rumor spread that the Ottomans had entered Moldavia, and this helped coalesce boyar resistance.[6]

Along with other Romanian and Phanariote boyars, Istrati also rejected offers to collaborate with the new regime—as noted by chronicler Manolachi Drăghici, Botoșani and the entire Upper Country were under very loose Eterist control, as Ypsilantis feared exposing his troops to an Austrian attack from the Duchy of Bukovina.[7] The city had preserved a small Ottoman outpost, whose soldiers got along well with the Romanian, Jewish and Armenian population, though it persecuted Greeks; it was overpowered by a 100-strong portion of the Sacred Band, which celebrated its victory by assaulting Jews and publicly decapitating an Ottoman soldier, whose blood was consumed by the Eterists in a mock version of the Eucharist.[8]

Drăghici reports that Istrati then took to the border village of Zvoriștea, where he secretly met with a boyar assembly that planned military resistance; other conspirators included Vornici Ioan Sturdza, Teodor Balș, Ionică Tăutu and Gheorghe Cuza, alongside Hatmani Răducanu Ruset and Costachi Cerchez, and Spatharios Petrachi Sturdza. They assembled a 3,000-strong peasant army from villages along the Siret, gathered under a plain red flag, the "symbol of war and killing."[9]

Historian Nicolae Iorga argues that these "counter-revolutionary" troops were financed and armed by Austria, whose government was upset by Ypsilantis' connection with the Russians. Noting that the boyars themselves were motivated "exclusively" by Romanian nationalism, he draws a parallel with the Pandur uprising in Wallachia, which also culminated as a war with the Greeks.[10] Scholar Pompiliu Eliade contrarily believes that the movement, "patriotic as it was in appearance", rested on conservatism, and represented "the progress of corruption under the [Phanariote] regime"; the aristocracy feared Ypsilantis as an usurper of their privilege, and resented the fact that he himself demanded to be served like a Phanariote Prince.[11]

The guerilla force, led into battle by Istrati and Ștefanachi Gherghel, took Botoșani by storm, disarming the Eterist guard and appointing Petru Vârnav as the city Ispravnic.[12] The remaining Greek garrison abandoned the Upper Country and regrouped in Țuțora; they attempted to cross into Russian Bessarabia, but refrained from doing so when Eterist commander Pendidekas threatened to execute all deserters.[13] Istrati and Gherghel camped out at Stâncești, where a new boyar gathering was convened. They awaited reinforcements and new orders, but none came, and the army simply scattered, with peasants returning to their villages.[14] Eliade suggests that, "although they had some trouble distinguishing between their many oppressors", the peasants "understood very well that, whatever the movement's outcome, they would be the only ones to suffer."[6] However, as argued by Iorga, the boyars themselves had been informed that Ypsilantis could not expect Russian backing, and therefore that the Eterists were doomed (see Battle of Sculeni).[15]

Phanariote rule was brought to an end when Vornic Sturdza took over as Prince; this boyar ascendancy was also curbed by the Russian occupation of 1829, bringing both Principalities under a new constitutional regime, called Regulamentul Organic. The Paharnic, who was probably dead before 1848,[16] left three sons, of whom the eldest, Iancu, was only known for his activity as a landowner in Călimănești-Tutova.[17] Manolachi and Nicolae (or Neculai) were more involved in Moldavia's cultural and political life. The Botoșani census of 1832 recorded that Gavril and Nicolae were living together; by then, Manolachi, known as "Agachii", was already a monk.[18] Nicolae, originally a tax collector among the Romani slaves,[19] entered political life in the late 1830s. A prominent supporter of Romanian nationalism and a pupil of George Bariț,[20] he was a contributor to journals such as Albina Românească, Dacia Literară, and Foaie pentru Minte, Inimă și Literatură.[21]

Posterity

Nicolae Istrati embraced radical liberalism in 1846, when he joined up with Alexandru Ioan Cuza's Patriotic Association, conspiring against Regulamentul Prince Mihail Sturdza.[22] Just before the Moldavian Revolution of 1848, his activism resulted in his imprisonment at Slatina Monastery,[23] where Manolachi was the Hegumen.[24] Genealogist and polemicist Constantin Sion claims that he was in reality spying for Sturdza and the Russians.[25] A brochure circulated at the time suggested that Nicolae repudiated the revolutionary movement, although its authenticity remains disputed.[26] In 1851, Manolachi became Bishop of Huși, replacing Sofronie Miclescu, who had advanced to Metropolitan of Moldavia. Under the new name of "Meletie Istrati", he is remembered as the founder of a theological seminary that came to be managed by Melchisedec Ștefănescu.[27]

During the final months of Sturdza's reign, Nicolae was promoted to Spatharios.[28] Following the Crimean War, Cuza's National Party came to endorse a union between Moldavia and Wallachia. In early 1856, Nicolae signed up to this agenda,[29] but immediately after embraced Moldavian particularism, then separatism, with "surprising ostentation and mounting fury."[30] However, he still framed his opposition in patriotic terms, arguing that union went against the consensus of European powers, and would therefore lead to an international punitive action against Moldavia; he also claimed that, if at all workable, the union would accelerate Moldavia's social and economic decline. He aired these concerns in his political newspaper Nepărtinitorul, which he published in cooperation with Aga Mihail Străjescu.[31] Together with his son, known as Titu or Titus Istrati, and his brother Meletie, he founded in 1856 the Orthodox church of Rotopănești, which carries a dedication to Moldavian liberties and hosts a statue personifying the country.[32]

During December, Caimacam Teodor Balș reshuffled the Moldavian cabinet, and Nicolae took over as Postelnic—or Minister of Public Works.[33] Though favored by Austrian envoys to Moldavia, he could not obtain an appointment as head of Internal Affairs, as that job was reserved for more high-ranking boyars.[34] The Istrati brothers were by then directly involved in polemics with Metropolitan Sofronie, whom they tried to coax or coerce into an anti-unionist stance. When Sofronie refused, Meletie was groomed by his brother to take over as Moldavia's religious leader—but died before this could happen.[35] As an associate of Gheorghe Asachi and a subordinate of Balș's replacement Nicolae Vogoride, Nicolae played a direct part in falsifying the election of July 1857,[36] resulting in his marginalization after the results were overturned. Before the repeat elections of 1858, he made a final attempt to channel peasant support for the separatist agenda by unilaterally introducing land reform on his Rotopănești estate.[37]

The Postelnic died in infamy in 1861, soon after the creation of the United Principalities; however, he achieved posthumous recognition for his work as a poet and humorist.[38] Shortly before the establishment of a Romanian Kingdom, Titu Istrati was a judge in Botoșani.[39] He rallied with the National Liberal Party and, following a January 1888 election, took a seat in Chamber for Vaslui County.[40] He later moved to the appellate court of Galați, serving as auditor during the local election of 1907.[41]

Notes

1. Dima et al., p. 581
2. Sion, pp. 110–111
3. Iorga, p. 173
4. Sion, p. 110
5. Gorovei, pp. 79–80, 128
6. Eliade, p. 388
7. Gorovei, p. 21
8. Gorovei, pp. 21, 22–23
9. Gorovei, pp. 21–22. See also Eliade, p. 388; Iorga, pp. 173, 174
10. Iorga, pp. 174, 175
11. Eliade, pp. 388–389
12. Gorovei, pp. 21–22; Iorga, pp. 173, 174–175
13. Gorovei, p. 22; Iorga, pp. 173–174
14. Gorovei, p. 22; Iorga, pp. 174, 175
15. Iorga, p. 175
16. Roman, p. 212
17. Sion, pp. 110–111
18. Gorovei, p. 128
19. Sion, p. 111
20. Bodea, pp. 46–48, 79, 89–90, 249–255, 303–304
21. Dima et al., pp. 243, 414, 419, 581
22. Dima et al., p. 581
23. Bodea, pp. 89–90, 303–304; Dima et al., p. 581
24. Sion, p. 111
25. Sion, pp. 111, 300–301, 316, 380–381
26. Dima et al., pp. 431, 581
27. Lina Codreanu, "'Momente' de vrednicie arhierească", in Danubius XXXIV. Rezumate, 2016, pp. 546–547
28. Sion, pp. 111, 316
29. Roman, p. 212
30. Dima et al., pp. 581–582
31. Roman, passim. See also Maciu, p. 60
32. Teodor Burada, "Școala de musică și declamație dela Rotopănești", in Biserica și Șcóla, Issue 39/1900, pp. 352–353
33. Maciu, pp. 66–67; Topor, p. 202
34. Topor, pp. 202, 205–206, 212
35. Nestor Vornicescu, "Participarea mitropolitului Moldovei Sofronie Miclescu la înfăptuirea Unirii Principatelor Române — 1859", in Biserica Ortodoxă Română, Vol. CII, Issue 1, January–February 1984, pp. 84–86, 88–89, 96
36. Dima et al., pp. 582–583; Topor, pp. 205–210
37. Gheorghe Platon, "Frămîntări țărănești în Moldova în preajma Unirii", in Studii. Revistă de Istorie, Vol. XII, Issue 1, 1959, p. 130
38. Dima et al., pp. 582–583
39. Gorovei, p. 422
40. "Viitoarea Camera", in România Liberă, January 27 (February 8), 1888, p. 1
41. "Informațiuni", in Vocea Tutovei, Issue 33/1906, p. 3

References

• Cornelia Bodea, Lupta românilor pentru unitatea națională, 1834–1849. Bucharest: Editura Academiei, 1967. OCLC 1252020
• Alexandru Dima and contributors, Istoria literaturii române. II: De la Școala Ardeleană la Junimea. Bucharest: Editura Academiei, 1968.
• Pompiliu Eliade, De l'influence française sur l'esprit public en Roumanie. Les origines. Étude sur l'état de la société roumaine a l'époque des règnes phanariotes. Paris: Ernest Leroux, 1898. OCLC 6967920
• Arthur Gorovei, Monografia Orașului Botoșani. Botoșani: Ediția Primăriei de Botoșani, 1938.
• Nicolae Iorga, "Două comunicații la Academia Română. II: O foaie de popularisare igienică și economică la 1844–45. Rolul fraților Vîrnav în Renașterea romănească", in Revista Istorică, Vol. V, Issues 8–10, August–October 1919, pp. 170–187.
• Vasile Maciu, "Organizarea mișcarii pentru Unire în anii 1855–1857 în Moldova și Țara Românească", in Studii. Revistă de Istorie, Vol. XII, Issue 1, 1959, pp. 43–73.
• Liviu I. Roman, "Un jurnal antiunionist: Nepărtinitorul (21 iunie — 10 septembrie 1856)", in Cercetări Istorice, Vol. XVII, Part 2, 1998, pp. 207–219.
• Constantin Sion, Arhondologia Moldoveĭ. Amintirĭ și note contimporane. Iași: Tipografia Buciumuluĭ Român, 1892.
• Claudiu-Lucian Topor, "Un opozant înverșunat al unirii principatelor: Rudolf Oskar baron de Gödel Lannoy", in Analele Științifice ale Universității Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iași. Istorie, Vols. LIV–LV, 2008–2009, pp. 197–214.