G3015 Kuytun–Tacheng Expressway

The Kuytun–Tacheng Expressway (Chinese: 奎屯—塔城高速公路, Uyghur: كۇيتۇن-چۆچەك يۇقىرى سۈرئەتلىك تاشيولى ), commonly referred to as the Kuita Expressway (Chinese: 奎塔高速公路) is an expressway that connects the cities of Kuytun and Tacheng in the Chinese autonomous region of Xinjiang. It is 368 kilometres (229 mi) in length.[1] The expressway is a spur or auxiliary line of the G30 Lianyungang–Khorgas Expressway. In the southeastern end, it connects to the G30 Lianyungang–Khorgas Expressway at Kuytun. In the northwestern end, it terminates at Xinjiang Provincial Highway 221 in Tacheng, close to the Bakhtu border crossing (Chinese: 巴克图口岸) on the China–Kazakhstan border.

Kuytun–Tacheng Expressway
奎屯-塔城高速公路
كۇيتۇن-چۆچەك يۇقىرى سۈرئەتلىك تاشيولى
Kuita Expressway
奎塔高速公路
Route information
Auxiliary route of G30
Length368 km[1] (229 mi)
Major junctions
Southeast end G30 / G217 / G312 in Kuytun, Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture, Xinjiang
  G3014 in Karamay
Northwest end Xinjiang S221 in Tacheng, Tacheng Prefecture, Xinjiang
Highway system
National Trunk Highway System
G3014G3016

Description

The expressway comprises two sections. The first section between Kuytun and Karamay is known as the Kuytun–Karamay Expressway (Chinese: 奎屯–克拉玛依高速公路), or Kuike Expressway (Chinese: 奎克高速公路) for short. It opened on October 13, 2012,[2] and is also designated as part of the G3014 Kuytun–Altay Expressway.

The second section from Karamay to Tacheng is known as the Karamay–Tacheng Expressway (Chinese: 克拉玛依–塔城高速公路), or Keta Expressway (Chinese: 克塔高速公路) for short. It opened on November 30, 2014.[3]

gollark: Is "interpreting things using different sets of techniques sometimes produces different/novel results" not enough for you?
gollark: What do you mean "rigorous take"?!
gollark: You mean Pascal's triangle?
gollark: Your idea of "run the thing backward" is quite obvious to anyone who looks at the problem. There have been many people looking at the problem. So if it worked someone would have proved collatz now.
gollark: <@!714406501346967572> 0.4 offense, but if you could easily prove the Collatz conjecture with relatively simple maths someone already would have,

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.