Federico De Franchi Toso (1560–1630)

Federico De Franchi Toso (Genoa, 1560 - Genoa, 23 January 1630) was the 96th Doge of the Republic of Genoa.

Federico De Franchi Toso
96th Doge of the Republic of Genoa
In office
June 25, 1623 – June 16, 1625
Preceded byGiorgio Centurione
Succeeded byGiacomo Lomellini
Personal details
Born1560
Genoa, Republic of Genoa
DiedJanuary 23, 1630
Genoa, Republic of Genoa

Biography

Third-born son of Gerolamo De Franchi Toso, doge of Genoa in the biennium 1581-1583, and Isabella Sauli, he was born in Genoa around 1560. on June 25, 1623, De Franchi ascended to the highest office of the Genoese state, the 51st in two-year succession and the ninety-sixth in republican history. After a relatively quiet and normal first year of customs mandate, the remaining end of the two-year period was characterized by increasingly tense relationships between the Republic of Genoa and the Duchy of Savoy of Charles Emmanuel I. By now near the outbreak of the conflict, inserted between the war phases of the Thirty Years' War, an agreed advance of the customs elections was chosen. Genoa and the republican government could not have run the risk of a vacant seat in such a delicate war period. The doge voluntarily resigned from office on the morning of 16 June 1625 and already in the evening the Grand Council chose Giacomo Lomellini as his successor. With the arrival of old age and health, the former doge De Franchi attended little the life of the state. De Franchi Toso died on January 23, 1630 in Genoa.[1][2]

gollark: If you accept this then any action which reduces future human population in some way is "culling", which is stupid.
gollark: This is another maybe technically accurate (at an even greater stretch) but ridiculous interpretation. If people don't exist, it is not in fact possible to remove them.
gollark: This sort of thing makes natural languages quite annoying, but you can help by, well, not picking the most emotionally charged word which "technically matches".
gollark: If I say "that person is a criminal" you might very well have a worsened opinion of them, even if I know that all they actually did was jaywalking or something. It's technically not *false* to call them that but misleads.
gollark: Using a word which is technically right by a dictionary definition can be misleading because it has connotations which possible alternate choices of word don't.

See also

References
  1. Buonadonna, Sergio. Rosso doge. I dogi della Repubblica di Genova dal 1339 al 1797 (in Italian). De Ferrari.
  2. "DE FRANCHI TOSO, Federico in "Dizionario Biografico"". www.treccani.it (in Italian). Retrieved 2020-07-29.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.