Electoral results for the district of Ferntree Gully
This is a list of electoral results for the Electoral district of Ferntree Gully in Victorian state elections.
Members for Ferntree Gully
Member | Party | Term | |
---|---|---|---|
Anne Eckstein | Labor | 2002–2006 | |
Nick Wakeling | Liberal | 2006–present |
Election results
Elections in the 2010s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Nick Wakeling | 17,614 | 49.41 | −4.49 | |
Labor | Julie Buxton | 14,618 | 41.01 | +7.85 | |
Greens | Steve Raymond | 3,414 | 9.58 | +0.49 | |
Total formal votes | 35,646 | 94.28 | −1.02 | ||
Informal votes | 2,162 | 5.72 | +1.02 | ||
Turnout | 37,808 | 91.90 | −0.97 | ||
Two-party-preferred result | |||||
Liberal | Nick Wakeling | 18,407 | 51.64 | −6.10 | |
Labor | Julie Buxton | 17,239 | 48.36 | +6.10 | |
Liberal hold | Swing | −6.10 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Nick Wakeling | 19,452 | 53.9 | −0.9 | |
Labor | Matt Posetti | 11,967 | 33.2 | +2.8 | |
Greens | Steve Raymond | 3,279 | 9.1 | +1.0 | |
Christians | Robert Roytel | 940 | 2.6 | +2.6 | |
Country Alliance | Russell Wulf | 451 | 1.2 | +1.2 | |
Total formal votes | 36,089 | 95.3 | +0.2 | ||
Informal votes | 1,781 | 4.7 | −0.2 | ||
Turnout | 37,870 | 92.9 | −4.7 | ||
Two-party-preferred result | |||||
Liberal | Nick Wakeling | 20,849 | 57.8 | −3.7 | |
Labor | Matt Posetti | 15,238 | 42.2 | +3.7 | |
Liberal hold | Swing | −3.7 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Nick Wakeling | 22,020 | 55.54 | +11.38 | |
Labor | Josh Cullinan | 11,768 | 29.68 | -12.39 | |
Greens | Steve Bullock | 2,850 | 7.19 | +0.08 | |
Sex Party | Martin Leahy | 1,492 | 3.76 | +3.76 | |
Family First | Allister Rouse | 957 | 2.41 | -2.15 | |
Democratic Labor | Tanya Murphy | 560 | 1.41 | +1.41 | |
Total formal votes | 39,467 | 94.77 | +0.10 | ||
Informal votes | 2,189 | 5.23 | -0.10 | ||
Turnout | 41,836 | 94.62 | +0.16 | ||
Two-party-preferred result | |||||
Liberal | Nick Wakeling | 24,591 | 62.00 | +11.96 | |
Labor | Josh Cullinan | 15,070 | 38.00 | -11.96 | |
Liberal hold | Swing | +11.96 | |||
Elections in the 2000s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Nick Wakeling | 16,187 | 44.16 | -1.04 | |
Labor | Anne Eckstein | 15,420 | 42.07 | -5.00 | |
Greens | Steve Bullock | 2,608 | 7.11 | -0.61 | |
Family First | Allister Rouse | 1,673 | 4.56 | +4.56 | |
People Power | Adrian Dowell | 635 | 1.73 | +1.73 | |
CEC | Ross Russell | 134 | 0.37 | +0.37 | |
Total formal votes | 36,657 | 94.67 | -2.45 | ||
Informal votes | 2,064 | 5.33 | +2.45 | ||
Turnout | 38,721 | 94.46 | -0.11 | ||
Two-party-preferred result | |||||
Liberal | Nick Wakeling | 18,342 | 50.04 | +2.35 | |
Labor | Anne Eckstein | 18,315 | 49.96 | -2.35 | |
Liberal gain from Labor | Swing | +2.35 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labor | Anne Eckstein | 16,700 | 47.1 | +7.2 | |
Liberal | Hurtle Lupton | 16,036 | 45.2 | -11.2 | |
Greens | Stephen Bullock | 2,740 | 7.7 | +7.7 | |
Total formal votes | 35,476 | 97.1 | -0.4 | ||
Informal votes | 1,052 | 2.9 | +0.4 | ||
Turnout | 36,528 | 94.6 | |||
Two-party-preferred result | |||||
Labor | Anne Eckstein | 18,548 | 52.3 | +9.9 | |
Liberal | Hurtle Lupton | 16,928 | 47.7 | -9.9 | |
Labor gain from Liberal | Swing | +9.9 |
gollark: It could record locally and upload later, though.
gollark: This person apparently reverse-engineered it statically, not at runtime, but it *can* probably detect if you're trying to reverse-engineer it a bit while running.
gollark: > > App behavior changes slightly if they know you're trying to figure out what they're doing> this sentence makes no sense to me, "if they know"? he's dissecting the code as per his own statement, thus looking at rows of text in various format. the app isn't running - so how can it change? does the app have self-awareness? this sounds like something out of a bad sci-fi movie from the 90's.It's totally possible for applications to detect and resist being debugged a bit.
gollark: > this is standard programming dogma, detailed logging takes a lot of space and typically you enable logging on the fly on clients to catch errors. this is literally cookie cutter "how to build apps 101", and not scary. or, phrased differently, is it scary if all of that logging was always on? obviously not as it's agreed upon and detailed in TikTok's privacy policy (really), so why is it scary that there's an on and off switch?This is them saying that remotely configurable logging is fine and normal; I don't think them being able to arbitrarily gather more data is good.
gollark: > on the topic of setting up a proxy server - it's a very standard practice to transcode and buffer media via a server, they have simply reversed the roles here by having server and client on the client, which makes sense as transcoding is very intensive CPU-wise, which means they have distributed that power requirement to the end user's devices instead of having to have servers capable of transcoding millions of videos.Transcoding media locally is not the same as having some sort of locally running *server* to do it.
References
- "Ferntree Gully District results". Victorian Electoral Commission. Archived from the original on 21 March 2012. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.