Ehrhart polynomial

In mathematics, an integral polytope has an associated Ehrhart polynomial that encodes the relationship between the volume of a polytope and the number of integer points the polytope contains. The theory of Ehrhart polynomials can be seen as a higher-dimensional generalization of Pick's theorem in the Euclidean plane.

These polynomials are named after Eugène Ehrhart who studied them in the 1960s.

Definition

Informally, if P is a polytope, and tP is the polytope formed by expanding P by a factor of t in each dimension, then L(P, t) is the number of integer lattice points in tP.

More formally, consider a lattice in Euclidean space and a d-dimensional polytope P in with the property that all vertices of the polytope are points of the lattice. (A common example is and a polytope for which all vertices have integer coordinates.) For any positive integer t, let tP be the t-fold dilation of P (the polytope formed by multiplying each vertex coordinate, in a basis for the lattice, by a factor of t), and let

be the number of lattice points contained in the polytope tP. Ehrhart showed in 1962 that L is a rational polynomial of degree d in t, i.e. there exist rational numbers such that:

for all positive integers t.

The Ehrhart polynomial of the interior of a closed convex polytope P can be computed as:

where d is the dimension of P. This result is known as Ehrhart–Macdonald reciprocity.[1]

Examples

This is the second dilate, , of a unit square. It has nine integer points.

Let P be a d-dimensional unit hypercube whose vertices are the integer lattice points all of whose coordinates are 0 or 1. In terms of inequalities,

Then the t-fold dilation of P is a cube with side length t, containing (t + 1)d integer points. That is, the Ehrhart polynomial of the hypercube is L(P,t) = (t + 1)d.[2][3] Additionally, if we evaluate L(P, t) at negative integers, then

as we would expect from Ehrhart–Macdonald reciprocity.

Many other figurate numbers can be expressed as Ehrhart polynomials. For instance, the square pyramidal numbers are given by the Ehrhart polynomials of a square pyramid with an integer unit square as its base and with height one; the Ehrhart polynomial in this case is 1/6(t + 1)(t + 2)(2t + 3).[4]

Ehrhart quasi-polynomials

Let P be a rational polytope. In other words, suppose

where and (Equivalently, P is the convex hull of finitely many points in ) Then define

In this case, L(P, t) is a quasi-polynomial in t. Just as with integral polytopes, Ehrhart–Macdonald reciprocity holds, that is,

Examples of Ehrhart quasi-polynomials

Let P be a polygon with vertices (0,0), (0,2), (1,1) and (3/2, 0). The number of integer points in tP will be counted by the quasi-polynomial [5]

Interpretation of coefficients

If P is closed (i.e. the boundary faces belong to P), some of the coefficients of L(P, t) have an easy interpretation:

  • the leading coefficient, , is equal to the d-dimensional volume of P, divided by d(L) (see lattice for an explanation of the content or covolume d(L) of a lattice);
  • the second coefficient, , can be computed as follows: the lattice L induces a lattice LF on any face F of P; take the (d − 1)-dimensional volume of F, divide by 2d(LF), and add those numbers for all faces of P;
  • the constant coefficient a0 is the Euler characteristic of P. When P is a closed convex polytope, }.

The Betke–Kneser theorem

Ulrich Betke and Martin Kneser[6] established the following characterization of the Ehrhart coefficients. A functional defined on integral polytopes is an and translation invariant valuation if and only if there are real numbers such that

Ehrhart series

We can define a generating function for the Ehrhart polynomial of an integral d-dimensional polytope P as

This series can be expressed as a rational function. Specifically, Ehrhart proved (1962) that there exist complex numbers , , such that the Ehrhart series of P is

Additionally, Richard P. Stanley's non-negativity theorem states that under the given hypotheses, will be non-negative integers, for .

Another result by Stanley shows that if P is a lattice polytope contained in Q, then for all j. The -vector is in general not unimodal, but it is whenever it is symmetric, and the polytope has a regular unimodal triangulation.[7]

Ehrhart series for rational polytopes

As in the case of polytopes with integer vertices, one defines the Ehrhart series for a rational polytope. For a d-dimensional rational polytope P, where D is the smallest integer such that DP is an integer polytope (D is called the denominator of P), then one has

where the are still non-negative integers.[8][9]

Non-leading coefficient bounds

The polynomial's non-leading coefficients in the representation

can be upper bounded:[10]

where is a Stirling number of the first kind. Lower bounds also exist.[11]

Toric variety

The case and of these statements yields Pick's theorem. Formulas for the other coefficients are much harder to get; Todd classes of toric varieties, the Riemann–Roch theorem as well as Fourier analysis have been used for this purpose.

If X is the toric variety corresponding to the normal fan of P, then P defines an ample line bundle on X, and the Ehrhart polynomial of P coincides with the Hilbert polynomial of this line bundle.

Ehrhart polynomials can be studied for their own sake. For instance, one could ask questions related to the roots of an Ehrhart polynomial.[12] Furthermore, some authors have pursued the question of how these polynomials could be classified.[13]

Generalizations

It is possible to study the number of integer points in a polytope P if we dilate some facets of P but not others. In other words, one would like to know the number of integer points in semi-dilated polytopes. It turns out that such a counting function will be what is called a multivariate quasi-polynomial. An Ehrhart-type reciprocity theorem will also hold for such a counting function.[14]

Counting the number of integer points in semi-dilations of polytopes has applications[15] in enumerating the number of different dissections of regular polygons and the number of non-isomorphic unrestricted codes, a particular kind of code in the field of coding theory.

gollark: Originally Bill Gates, apparently now the meaning of culling and also of words.
gollark: If you accept this then any action which reduces future human population in some way is "culling", which is stupid.
gollark: This is another maybe technically accurate (at an even greater stretch) but ridiculous interpretation. If people don't exist, it is not in fact possible to remove them.
gollark: This sort of thing makes natural languages quite annoying, but you can help by, well, not picking the most emotionally charged word which "technically matches".
gollark: If I say "that person is a criminal" you might very well have a worsened opinion of them, even if I know that all they actually did was jaywalking or something. It's technically not *false* to call them that but misleads.

See also

Notes

  1. Macdonald, Ian G. (1971). "Polynomials associated with finite cell-complexes" (PDF). Journal of the London Mathematical Society. 2 (1): 181–192. doi:10.1112/jlms/s2-4.1.181.
  2. De Loera, Rambau & Santos (2010)
  3. Mathar (2010)
  4. Beck et al. (2005).
  5. Beck, Matthias; Robins, Sinai (2007). Computing the Continuous Discretely. New York: Springer. pp. 46–47. MR 2271992.
  6. Betke, Ulrich; Kneser, Martin (1985), "Zerlegungen und Bewertungen von Gitterpolytopen", Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 358: 202–208, MR 0797683
  7. Athanasiadis, Christos A. (2004). "h*-Vectors, Eulerian Polynomials and Stable Polytopes of Graphs". Electronic Journal of Combinatorics. 11 (2).
  8. Stanley, Richard P. (1980). "Decompositions of rational convex polytopes". Annals of Discrete Mathematics. 6: 333–342. doi:10.1016/s0167-5060(08)70717-9. ISBN 9780444860484.
  9. Beck, Matthias; Sottile, Frank (January 2007). "Irrational proofs for three theorems of Stanley". European Journal of Combinatorics. 28 (1): 403–409. arXiv:math/0501359. doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2005.06.003.
  10. Betke, Ulrich; McMullen, Peter (1985-12-01). "Lattice points in lattice polytopes". Monatshefte für Mathematik. 99 (4): 253–265. doi:10.1007/BF01312545. ISSN 1436-5081.
  11. Henk, Martin; Tagami, Makoto (2009-01-01). "Lower bounds on the coefficients of Ehrhart polynomials". European Journal of Combinatorics. 30 (1): 70–83. arXiv:0710.2665. doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2008.02.009. ISSN 0195-6698.
  12. Braun, Benjamin; Develin, Mike (2008). Ehrhart Polynomial Roots and Stanley's Non-Negativity Theorem. Contemporary Mathematics. 452. American Mathematical Society. pp. 67–78. arXiv:math/0610399. doi:10.1090/conm/452/08773. ISBN 9780821841730.
  13. Higashitani, Akihiro (2012). "Classification of Ehrhart Polynomials of Integral Simplices" (PDF). DMTCS Proceedings: 587–594.
  14. Beck, Matthias (January 2002). "Multidimensional Ehrhart reciprocity". Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series A. 97 (1): 187–194. arXiv:math/0111331. doi:10.1006/jcta.2001.3220.
  15. Lisonek, Petr (2007). "Combinatorial Families Enumerated by Quasi-polynomials". Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series A. 114 (4): 619–630. doi:10.1016/j.jcta.2006.06.013.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.