Edward Grimston (diplomat)

Edward Grimston or Grymeston (died 1478) was the son of Robert Grimston, who lived in Grimston, East Riding of Yorkshire, and a daughter of Sir Anthony Spilman of Suffolk.[1] Edward was a diplomat in the service of Henry VI of England and was the ambassador of England at the court of Philip the Good, the Duke of Burgundy. In 1446, when he travelled to Calais and Brussels, he was painted by Petrus Christus, an Early Netherlandish painter active in Bruges. He was active at the courts of Burgundy and France throughout the latter half of the 1440s.[1] He ended his public career in 1451.[2]

Portrait of Grimston by Petrus Christus, 1446, now on loan to the National Gallery

His first wife died sometime before 1456 when he remarried Mary Drury, a woman from Suffolk, daughter of Sir William Drury and through her mother a great-granddaughter of Katherine Swynford. They had five sons and three daughters. At some time he lived in Eye, Suffolk. After Mary Drury had died in 1469, Grimston married a third time with Philippa, the widow of Lord Roos.[2]

He died in 1478 and is buried in the church of Thorndon, Suffolk next to his second wife Mary.[2] His portrait has remained in the hands of his descendants the Earls of Verulam, currently John Grimston, 7th Earl of Verulam, but is on long-term loan to the National Gallery.

Notes

  1. Franks, A. W. (1866). Notes on Edward Grimston. Archaeologia. p. 455-470.
  2. Richmond, Colin (2000). The Paston Family in the Fifteenth Century: Endings. Manchester University Press. p. 209-210. ISBN 9780719059902.
gollark: There is also the "secondary processor exemption" thing, which caused the Librem people to waste a lot of time on having a spare processor on their SoC load a blob into the SoC memory controller from some not-user-accessible flash rather than just using the main CPU cores. This does not improve security because you still have the blob running with, you know, full control of RAM, yet RYF certification requires solutions like this.
gollark: It would be freerâ„¢, in my opinion, to have all the firmware distributed sanely via a package manager, and for the firmware to be controllable by users, than to have it entirely hidden away.
gollark: So you can have proprietary firmware for an Ethernet controller or bee apifier or whatever, but it's only okay if you deliberately stop the user from being able to read/write it.
gollark: No, it's how they're okay with things having proprietary firmware *but only if the user cannot interact with it*.
gollark: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/stallman-kth.html
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.