Economy of the British Empire

After the defeat of France in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars (1792–1815), the British Empire emerged as the principal naval and imperial power of the 19th century.[1] Unchallenged at sea, British dominance was later described as Pax Britannica ("British Peace"), a period of relative peace in Europe and the world (1815–1914) during which the British Empire became the global hegemon and adopted the role of global policeman.[2][3][4][5] In the early 19th century, the Industrial Revolution began to transform Britain; by the time of the Great Exhibition in 1851 the country was described as the "workshop of the world".[6]

Economic statistics

Territorial GDP distribution of the British Empire (1870)[7]

  British Raj (50.04%)
  United Kingdom (37.19%)
  Ireland (3.58%)
  Canada (2.39%)
  Australia (2.14%)
  Egypt (1.69%)
  Other territories (2.97%)

The following table gives gross domestic product (GDP) estimates of the British Empire and its territories in 1870 and 1913, as a percentage of the world economy and the empire's economy, along with comparisons to the United States and Russian Empire. The British imperial territory with the largest economy in 1870 was British India (including what are now Pakistan and Bangladesh), followed by the United Kingdom. The territory with the largest economy in 1913 was the United Kingdom, followed by British India.[7] The table does not include GDP estimates for British African territories other than British Egypt.

British Empire territory % of world GDP
(1870)		 % of empire GDP
(1870)		 % of world GDP
(1913)		 % of empire GDP
(1913)
United Kingdom 9.03 37.19 17.19 47.04
British Raj 12.15 50.04 15.47 42.33
Ireland 0.87 3.58 0.44 1.20
Canada 0.58 2.39 1.28 3.50
Australia 0.52 2.14 0.91 2.49
Egypt 0.41 1.69 0.4 1.09
Ceylon 0.21 0.87 0.22 0.62
Burma 0.19 0.78 0.31 0.84
New Zealand 0.08 0.33 0.21 0.57
Malaya 0.05 0.21 0.1 0.27
Hong Kong 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.05
Singapore 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.05
Total British Empire 24.28 100 36.54 100
United States 8.87 36.53 18.93 51.80
Russian Empire 7.54 31.05 8.5 23.26
gollark: I haven't seen anything do better than markets for this.
gollark: Your solution shouldn't overly rely on a central authority, be reasonably adaptable and quick with changing circumstances, and actually make the incentives work.
gollark: > sure resource distribution is nontrivial but its not that hardWhat do you propose to do for it?
gollark: Hack into Twitter again and make Trump tweet about the asymmetrical emoji.
gollark: Mail slightly asymmetrical foxes to the twemoji people in real life.

See also

References
  1. Tellier, L.-N. (2009). Urban World History: an Economic and Geographical Perspective. Quebec: PUQ. p. 463. ISBN 2-7605-1588-5.
  2. Johnston, Douglas M.; Reisman, W. Michael (2008). The Historical Foundations of World Order. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. pp. 508–510. ISBN 9047423933.
  3. Porter, p. 332.
  4. Sondhaus, L. (2004). Navies in Modern World History. London: Reaktion Books. p. 9. ISBN 1-86189-202-0.
  5. Porter, Andrew (1998). The Nineteenth Century, The Oxford History of the British Empire Volume III. Oxford University Press. p. 332. ISBN 0-19-924678-5.
  6. "The Workshop of the World". BBC History. Retrieved 28 April 2013.
  7. Goedele De Keersmaeker (2017), Polarity, Balance of Power and International Relations Theory: Post-Cold War and the 19th Century Compared, page 90, Springer Science+Business Media
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.