Diving at the 2014 European Aquatics Championships – Women's 3 m springboard
The Women's 3 m springboard competition of the 2014 European Aquatics Championships was held on 24 August.[1]
| Women's 3 m springboard at the Diving at the 2014 European Aquatics Championships | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dates | 24 August | |||||||||
| Competitors | 24 from 16 nations | |||||||||
| Winning points | 322.80 | |||||||||
| Medalists | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| 2014 European Aquatics Championships | ||
|---|---|---|
 | ||
| Swimming | ||
| Freestyle | ||
| 50 m | men | women |
| 100 m | men | women |
| 200 m | men | women |
| 400 m | men | women |
| 800 m | men | women |
| 1500 m | men | women |
| Backstroke | ||
| 50 m | men | women |
| 100 m | men | women |
| 200 m | men | women |
| Breaststroke | ||
| 50 m | men | women |
| 100 m | men | women |
| 200 m | men | women |
| Butterfly | ||
| 50 m | men | women |
| 100 m | men | women |
| 200 m | men | women |
| Individual medley | ||
| 200 m | men | women |
| 400 m | men | women |
| Freestyle relay | ||
| 4×100 m | men | women |
| 4×200 m | men | women |
| Medley relay | ||
| 4×100 m | men | women |
| Diving | ||
| Individual | ||
| 1 m | men | women |
| 3 m | men | women |
| 10 m | men | women |
| Synchronised | ||
| 3 m | men | women |
| 10 m | men | women |
| Team | team | |
| Synchronised swimming | ||
| Individual | Solo | Duet |
| Team | Team | Combination |
| Open water swimming | ||
| 5 km | men | women |
| 10 km | men | women |
| 25 km | men | women |
| Team | team | |
Results
The preliminary round was held at 12:00[2] and the final at 18:00.[3]
Green denotes finalists
| Rank | Diver | Nationality | Preliminary | Final | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Rank | Points | Rank | |||
 |
Nadezhda Bazhina |  |
309.45 | 3 | 322.80 | 1 |
 |
Tania Cagnotto |  |
321.45 | 1 | 318.25 | 2 |
 |
Nora Subschinski |  |
293.85 | 7 | 317.90 | 3 |
| 4 | Tina Punzel | |
273.60 | 10 | 314.20 | 4 |
| 5 | Uschi Freitag |  |
298.80 | 5 | 306.45 | 5 |
| 6 | Viktoriya Kesar |  |
311.00 | 2 | 302.20 | 6 |
| 7 | Hannah Starling |  |
280.75 | 9 | 297.40 | 7 |
| 8 | Anastasiya Nedobiga | |
286.80 | 8 | 294.70 | 8 |
| 9 | Inge Jansen | |
300.00 | 4 | 288.30 | 9 |
| 10 | Alena Khamulkina |  |
263.20 | 12 | 287.00 | 10 |
| 11 | Alicia Blagg | |
295.20 | 6 | 286.50 | 11 |
| 12 | Daniella Nero |  |
270.75 | 11 | 265.40 | 12 |
| 13 | Maria Marconi | |
252.55 | 13 | ||
| 14 | Maxine Eouzan |  |
246.85 | 14 | ||
| 15 | Anca Serb |  |
242.50 | 15 | ||
| 16 | Jessica Favre |  |
241.35 | 16 | ||
| 17 | Marion Farissier | |
240.30 | 17 | ||
| 18 | Rocio Velázquez |  |
240.00 | 18 | ||
| 19 | Flóra Gondos |  |
237.30 | 19 | ||
| 20 | Kristina Ilinykh | |
230.50 | 20 | ||
| 21 | Taina Karvonen |  |
229.25 | 21 | ||
| 22 | Ioulianna Banousi |  |
222.10 | 22 | ||
| 23 | Indrė Girdauskaitė |  |
208.95 | 23 | ||
| 24 | Iira Laatunen | |
194.10 | 24 | ||
gollark: Maybe you should rewrite it in Rust.
gollark: Thusly, git.osmarks.net is C.
gollark: > Allows visitors to look and download without authenticating. (A+0)Yes.> Does not log anything about visitors. (A+1)No. Your IP and user agent are logged for purposes.> Follows the criteria in The Electronic Frontier Foundation's best practices for online service providers. (A+2)> Follows the Web “Content” Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0) standard. (A+3)> Follows the Web Accessibility Initiative — Accessible Rich Internet Applications 1.0 (WAI-ARIA 1.0) standard. (A+4)Probably not.> All data contributed by the project owner and contributors is exportable in a machine-readable format. (A+5)No idea. There might be an API.
gollark: > All important site functions work correctly (though may not look as nice) when the user disables execution of JavaScript and other code sent by the site. (A0)I think they *mostly* do.> Server code released as free software. (A1)Yes.> Encourages use of GPL 3-or-later as preferred option. (A2)> Offers use of AGPL 3-or-later as an option. (A3)> Does not permit nonfree licenses (or lack of license) for works for practical use. (A4)See above. Although not ALLOWING licenses like that would be very not free.> Does not recommend services that are SaaSS. (A5)Yes.> Says “free software,” not “open source.” (A6)Don't know if it says either.> Clearly endorses the Free Software Movement's ideas of freedom. (A7)No.> Avoids saying “Linux” without “GNU” when referring to GNU/Linux. (A8)It says neither.> Insists that each nontrivial file in a package clearly and unambiguously state how it is licensed. (A9)No, and this is stupid.
gollark: > All code sent to the user's browser must be free software and labeled for LibreJS or other suitable free automatic license analyzer, regardless of whether the site functions when the user disables this code. (B0)Nope!> Does not report visitors to other organizations; in particular, no tracking tags in the pages. This means the site must avoid most advertising networks. (B1)Yes, it is entirely served locally.> Does not encourage bad licensing practices (no license, unclear licensing, GPL N only). (B2)Again, don't think gitea has this.> Does not recommend nonfree licenses for works of practical use. (B3)See above.
References
- Start list
- "Preliminary round Results" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-08-26. Retrieved 2014-08-24.
- "Final Results" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-08-26. Retrieved 2014-08-24.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.