Debbie Jabbour

Deborah Cecile "Debbie" Jabbour (born 1954 or 1955) is a Canadian politician who was elected in the 2015 Alberta general election to the Legislative Assembly of Alberta representing the electoral district of Peace River.[1] She is a provisional psychologist at the Addictions & Mental Health ward of the Northwest Health Centre in High Level, Alberta, where she moved in 2014.[2][3]

Debbie Jabbour
Jabbour in May 2015
Member of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta for Peace River
In office
May 5, 2015  April 16, 2019
Preceded byFrank Oberle
Succeeded byDan Williams
Personal details
Born1954/1955 (age 65–66)
Edmonton, Alberta
Political partyAlberta New Democratic Party
ResidenceHigh Level, Alberta
OccupationProvisional Psychologist

Electoral history

2019 general election

2019 Alberta general election: Peace River
Party Candidate Votes%±%
United ConservativeDan Williams9,77069.4
New DemocraticDebbie Jabbour3,13922.3
Alberta PartyDakota House7215.1
Freedom ConservativeConnie Russel2491.8
LiberalRemi Tardif1981.4
Total valid votes 14,077
Rejected, spoiled, and declined 117
Registered electors / Turnout 56.1

2015 general election

2015 Alberta general election: Peace River
Party Candidate Votes%±%
New DemocraticDebbie Jabbour3,82139.37+30.00
Progressive ConservativeFrank Oberle3,52936.36-19.33
WildroseNathan Steinke1,97920.39-8.01
Alberta PartySherry Hilton3763.87
Total valid votes 9,705
Rejected, spoiled, and declined 40
Registered electors / Turnout 20,46447.62+7.36
New Democratic gain from Progressive Conservative Swing +24.67
Source(s)
Elections Alberta. "Electoral Division Results: Peace River". Retrieved July 10, 2018.
gollark: GPUs use SIMD, where several thousand small cores operate on a little bit of the input data, which is very good for their high performance computing needs.
gollark: There are multiple appropriate ones for various scenarios.
gollark: They're bad at it and it would not be easier if you could just spin off new threads at random. There would also probably be issues with synchronization overhead.
gollark: No, that would cause horrible race conditions constantly.
gollark: Anyway, threads and the various synchronization primitives in C (or, well, commonly used with C?) are not a particularly good model for concurrency given the many, many bugs created through use of such things, as opposed to actor models and whatever.

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.