Darcs

Darcs is a distributed version control system created by David Roundy. Key features include the ability to choose which changes to accept from other repositories, interaction with either other local (on-disk) repositories or remote repositories via SSH, HTTP, or email, and an unusually interactive interface. The developers also emphasize the use of advanced software tools for verifying correctness: the expressive type system of the functional programming language Haskell enforces some properties, and randomized testing via QuickCheck verifies many others.[2] The name is a recursive acronym for Darcs Advanced Revision Control System.[3]

Darcs
Original author(s)David Roundy
Developer(s)Guillaume Hoffmann, et al.
Initial releaseMarch 3, 2003 (2003-03-03)[1]
Stable release
2.14.2 / January 26, 2019 (2019-01-26)[1]
Repository
Written inHaskell
Operating systemUnix, Linux, BSD, Apple macOS, MS Windows
TypeVersion control
LicenseGNU GPL
Websitedarcs.net/ 

Model

Darcs treats patches as first-class citizens. For the user, a repository can be seen as a set of patches, where each patch is not necessarily ordered with respect to other patches, i.e. the set of patches is only a partially ordered set. In many cases patches can be independently transmitted between various repositories.

Many branching, merging, and cherry-picking operations that would require additional commands with snapshot-based systems like Git or Mercurial can be directly done with Darcs with the usual "pull" and "push" commands. In terms of user interface, this means that Darcs has fewer commands. These commands are more interactive: one can choose more precisely which patches they want to exchange with remote repositories.

The patches of a repository are linearly ordered. Darcs automatically calculates whether patches can be reordered (an operation called commutation), and how to do it. These calculations implement a so-called "patch theory".

A Darcs patch can contain changes of the following kinds:

  • line changes,
  • file and directory creation and deletion,
  • file and directory moving,
  • word substitution (typically used in code refactoring, for instance rename all occurrences of "foo" to "bar" in a given file).

The notion of dependency between patches is defined syntactically. Intuitively, a patch B depends on another patch A if A provides the content that B modifies. This means that patches that modify different parts of the code are considered, by default, independent. To address cases when this is not desirable, Darcs enables the user to specify explicit dependencies between patches.

Since version 2.10, Darcs uses patience diff by default.

History

Darcs evolved out of David Roundy's efforts to design a new patch format for GNU arch in June 2002. These discussions didn't lead to any code being committed to Arch, but did lead to the conception of the theory of patches. After writing an initial version of Darcs in C++, the Haskell version was written in Autumn 2002 and released to the public in April 2003. Darcs 2.0 was released in April 2008 and introduced a more robust repository format, as well as a new patch semantics called "darcs-2", aimed at minimizing exponential merge issues.[4] The current development strategy focuses on implementing optimizations and adding new features, while maintaining the same repository format.

Shortcomings

Darcs has been criticized on the grounds of performance.[5][6] One of the most notable issues was related to the merge algorithm in Darcs 1.x, which could do exponential work to merge some conflicts. Although the issue was not completely corrected in Darcs 2,[7] the frequency of exponential merges has been reduced. Bugs still remain in which merging of recursive conflicts fails.[8]

gollark: Do what you want as long as it doesn't harm others, anyway.
gollark: People *constantly* say "something something your picture is a pizza", even though it is CLEARLY* hyperbolic geometry.
gollark: I am of course familiar with the general concept though - my profile picture contains subliminal pizza advertising.
gollark: It seems very conspiracy-theoretic and pointless.
gollark: No particular reason, like other things? I don't think we're at a point where every detail of movies is ruthlessly microoptimized for audience appeal yet.

See also
  • Comparison of version control software

References
  1. "Changelog for darcs". Hackage. Retrieved 2018-06-24.
  2. Roundy 2005, p. 2: ‘One of the problems I had with the initial C++ darcs was that I had no unit testing code. Within two weeks of the first darcs record, I started using QuickCheck to test the patch functions, and the same day I fixed a bug that was discovered by QuickCheck. QuickCheck makes it very easy to define properties that functions must have, which are then tested with randomly generated data.’
  3. Roundy, David (2008-10-21), "prefer recursive acronymn (sic) to embarrassing one", Darcs (Commit), Darcs Hub.
  4. "Two", Darcs
  5. Marlow, Simon (March 7, 2007), "Current status of Darcs", Darcs users (mailing list), OSUOSL.
  6. Fendt, Robert (January 9, 2009), "DVCS Round-Up: One System to Rule Them All?", Developer Network, 1, Linux Foundation, archived from the original on 2009-02-28.
  7. "ConflictsFAQ", Wiki, Darcs.
  8. "Issue 1520 Irrefutable pattern failed for pattern Data.Maybe.Just a2", Bug Tracker, Darcs.
  • Roundy, David (2005), "Darcs: distributed version management in Haskell", Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Haskell, Tallinn, Estonia, pp. 1–4, doi:10.1145/1088348.1088349, ISBN 1-59593-071-X
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.