Crystal darter

The crystal darter (Crystallaria asprella) is a small North American fish found in small, moderate, and swift rivers in the drainage basins of the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers.[2] It is now extirpated from a majority of its range along the Ohio River.

Crystal darter
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Animalia
Phylum:
Chordata
Class:
Actinopterygii
Order:
Perciformes
Family:
Percidae
Genus:
Crystallaria
Species:
C. asprella
Binomial name
Crystallaria asprella
(D. S. Jordan, 1878)
Synonyms
  • Pleurolepis asprellus (D. S. Jordan, 1878)
  • Ammocrypta asprella (D. S. Jordan, 1878)

Appearance

The crystal darter can grow to 12 cm (5 in) in length. It is olive-colored to tan with four dark saddles extending downward to its lateral line, a brownish stripe, and a whitish belly. Its maximum reported age is three years.[3]

Distribution and habitat

The historical range of the crystal darter included the Mississippi River basin, from Wisconsin and Indiana, southwards to southeastern Oklahoma, northern Louisiana, southern Mississippi, the Mobile Basin, Pascagoula, Pearl River, Florida, Alabama, and Mississippi. It is now absent from much of this range and is rare in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and Missouri. It is found in swift-flowing streams with clear or slightly turbid water and moderately swift riffles, on small or medium-sized rivers with beds of sand or gravel. It is not found on silty bottoms or areas with vegetation. Individual fish often hide under stones or bury themselves in sand with just their eyes showing.[1]

Reproductive Biology

One study focused on the Saline River, Arkansas, suggested that crystal darters spawn multiple times from January through mid-April.[4] Another study, conducted in Alabama, revealed conflicting evidence that suggested the onset of spawning begins in late February and lasts approximately one week in duration.[5] The explanation for such discrepancy in breeding season timing and length is unknown, however, Hubbs (1985) suggested a difference in latitudinal location could explain the variation.[5] Multiple males can copulate with one female at a time.[6] Juvenile crystal darters grow rapidly and reach sexual maturity before age one, but do not spawn until the following season.[4] Most females reach sexual maturity by 50 mm standard length, but males do not mature until they reach 61 mm standard length.[4] Males grow faster and, consequently, adults males are larger than females of the same age. The difference in growth rates and size is probably due to females allocating more of their energy for reproduction.[4] Clutch size ranges from 106-576 mature oocytes per female, and clutch size is positively correlated with fish length.[4] The crystal darter is sexually dimorphic and mature males possess longer soft dorsal and anal fins than females.[4]

Burrowing Behavior

The crystal darter burrows in sandy substrates with only its eyes protruding.[5] This behavior may have evolved to capture prey, avoid predators, or conserve energy.[5] In 1989, Robert Daniels conducted a study on a closely related species, the Eastern sand darter, Ammocrypta pellucida, to explain burying behavior, but rejected both the prey avoidance and prey capturing hypotheses.[7] He suggested that darters burrow in order to save energy while maintaining their position in the sandy substrate where they live. This behavior may be very important during periods of high or low flow, but can be exhibited at any time.[7] Results from Daniels' study may also explain burying behavior in the crystal darter.[7]

Threats

The crystal darter is susceptible to a number of threats including overexploitation, habitat degradation through pollution and siltation, and habitat modification through stream flow alterations and artificial impoundment.[5]

Small populations of the crystal darter can be affected by scientific or educational collecting. However, collection for research purposes is important in regard to gaining information critical to developing management and conservation strategies to protect the species.[5]

Percid species, such as the crystal darter, require clean gravel and sand substrates for reproduction and foraging for food sources.[8] This habitat requirement makes them sensitive to activities that cause pollution and siltation, such as mining, logging, natural gas exploration and extraction, and agriculture. Because crystal darters are geographically confined to a few freshwater systems with clear, fast-moving water they are particularly vulnerable to extinction when their limited habitat is degraded.[5]

Soil erosion due to intensive or inadequate agricultural and forestry practices and construction activities has amplified the natural effects of siltation in the water bodies that drain these areas. Increased fine sediment deposition in the water column results in increased turbidity and limited light penetration, which can potentially reduce primary productivity with resulting impacts on the rest of the trophic system, including a reduction in habitat for insectivore prey items.[9] High concentrations of fine sediment can also affect fish by reducing their rate of growth, decreasing their tolerance to disease or directly killing them by clogging gill rakers and filaments. Siltation also reduces the suitability of critical spawning habitat, and thus hinders the stability and growth of future populations. Siltation is particularly threatening to the crystal darter, because it relies on clean sand and gravel habitats to reproduce. In addition, natural fish migration patterns can be modified when certain areas of this route become uninhabitable. Finally, siltation negatively affects the efficiency of hunting in visual feeders, such as the crystal darter.[9]

Stream flow modification through channelization and dredging can also affect darter populations. These processes can alter hydrologic regimes by reducing flow velocity through the straightening and widening of channels.[5] Since the crystal darter prefers strong currents, converting fast moving streams into slower moving channels or pools through these modifications can reduce the amount of available habitat to the crystal darter. In addition to altering flow, these modifications also reduce habitat diversity.[5]

Artificial impoundments, such as dams, increase the amount of sedimentation in streams by drowning riffles and reducing flow, causing changes in substrate composition.[9] In addition to increasing the effects of siltation, impoundments fragment fish habitat. Fragmentation can affect immigration and emigration between populations, inhibiting connectivity and gene flow. Isolated populations become increasingly susceptible to environmental disturbances, and if these populations were extirpated new fishes would be unable to recolonize and counter these local extinctions.[5] Isolation to reduced ranges due to habitat fragmentation can also inhibit gene dispersal, consequently limiting genetic diversity which can lead to reduced fitness of populations.[10]

Conservation

The crystal darter is listed as vulnerable by the IUCN on its Red List because of "a decline in area of occupancy, extent of occurrence and/or quality of habitat".[1] It is also listed as a special concern species by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources[11] and the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission,[12] as an endangered species by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources[13] and the Missouri Department of Conservation,[14] as an extirpated species by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources,[15] and as a tier 1, or critically impaired, species by the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks[16] because of "extreme rarity (five or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals or acres) or because of some factor(s) making it vulnerable to extirpation."

gollark: That sounds unpleasant.
gollark: Though I think theirs is compiled from non-hundred-thousand line files.
gollark: I mean, SQLite does that and it works for *them*, but it also means they have a hundred thousand line C file.
gollark: ÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆ
gollark: This is important because having to do everything yourself is uncool.

References
  1. NatureServe 2013. Crystallaria asprella. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. <www.iucnredlist.org Archived June 27, 2014, at the Wayback Machine>. Downloaded on 23 April 2014.
  2. FishBase (1991). Species Summary. Retrieved 17 October 2010.
  3. Gilbert, Carter R. and Williams, James D. National Audubon Society Field Guide to Fishes: North America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002. 356.
  4. George, Stephen G.; Slack, William T.; Douglas, Neil H. (1996). "Demography, habitat, reproduction, and sexual dimorphism of the crystal darter, Crystallaria asprella (Jordan), from South-Central Arkansas". Copeia. 1996 (1): 68–78. doi:10.2307/1446942. JSTOR 1446942.
  5. Grandmaison, David; Mayasich, Joseph; Etnier, David. "Crystal Darter Status Assessment Report" (PDF). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 June 2013. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
  6. "Crystal Darter: Crystallaria asprella". Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Florida fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Retrieved 25 March 2015.
  7. Daniels, Robert A. (1989). "Significance of burying in Ammocrypta pellucida". Copeia. 1989 (1): 29–34. doi:10.2307/1445601. JSTOR 1445601.
  8. Osier, Elizabeth A. (2005). "Distribution and Habitat Use of the Crystal Darter (Crystallarie asprella) and Spotted Darter (Etheostoma maculatum) in the Elk River, West Virginia" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 May 2015. Retrieved 23 April 2015. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  9. Wood, Paul J.; Armitage, Patrick D. (1997). "Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment" (PDF). Environmental Management. 21 (2): 203–217. doi:10.1007/s002679900019. PMID 9008071. Retrieved 9 March 2015.
  10. Templeton, Alan R.; Shaw, Kerry; Routman, Eric; Davis, Scott K. (1990). "The genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation". Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 77 (1): 13–27. doi:10.2307/2399621. JSTOR 2399621.
  11. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (2006). Fish - Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Species Archived 2006-05-19 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 15 August 2006.
  12. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (2006). Species of Special Concenrn Archived 2006-08-24 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 31 August 2006.
  13. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2006). The Natural Heritage Inventory Working List: Rare Fish Archived 2006-10-13 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 31 August 2006.
  14. Missouri Department of Conservation (2006). Missouri Species and Communities of Conservation Concern Archived 2006-09-28 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 31 August 2006.
  15. Illinois Department of Natural Resources (2006). Illinois Fish Families/Species Archived 2006-08-19 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 31 August 2006.
  16. Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks (2006). Endangered Species of Mississippi Archived 2006-08-30 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 31 August 2006.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.