Crossed pentagrammic cupola

In geometry, the crossed pentagrammic cupola is one of the nonconvex Johnson solid isomorphs, being topologically identical to the convex pentagonal cupola. It can be obtained as a slice of the great rhombicosidodecahedron or quasirhombicosidodecahedron. As in all cupolae, the base polygon has twice as many edges and vertices as the top; in this case the base polygon is a decagram.

Crossed pentagrammic cupola
TypeJohnson isomorph
Cupola
Faces5 triangles
5 squares
1 pentagram
1 decagram
Edges25
Vertices15
Vertex configuration5+5(3.4.10/3)
5(3.4.5/3.4)
Schläfli symbol{5/3} || t{5/3}
Symmetry groupC5v, [5], (*55)
Rotation groupC5, [5]+, (55)
Dual polyhedron-

It may be seen as a cupola with a retrograde pentagrammic base, so that the squares and triangles connect across the bases in the opposite way to the pentagrammic cuploid, hence intersecting each other more deeply.

Family of star-cupolae
n / d 4 5 7 8
3
{4/3}

{5/3}

{7/3}

{8/3}
5
{7/5}

{8/5}

The crossed pentagonal cupola may be seen as a part of the uniform polyhedra known as the nonconvex great rhombicosidodecahedron, great dodecicosidodecahedron, and great rhombidodecahedron.


Crossed pentagrammic cupola

Nonconvex great rhombicosidodecahedron

Great dodecicosidodecahedron

Great rhombidodecahedron

Various crossed pentagrammic cupolae on the nonconvex great rhombicosidodecahedron may be diminished or gyrated (rotated) to produce a set of 12 polyhedra isomorphic to the Johnson solids J72 to J83. They are the gyrate, metabigyrate, parabigyrate, trigyrate, diminished, metabidiminished, parabidiminished, tridiminished, metagyrate diminished, paragyrate diminished, bigyrate diminished, and gyrate bidiminished quasirhombicosidodecahedra.

Dual polyhedron

The dual of the crossed pentagrammic cupola has 10 triangular and 5 kite faces:

gollark: Ah, yes.
gollark: If an element is unrecognized you should default to just displaying the text.
gollark: ?
gollark: Also, you *do* realise that many, many websites will be out of reach due to:- overuse of images- complex CSS features- JS reliance- just having content which is hard to display in 16 colors on a 51x20 or whatever screen
gollark: `<rec>`? Is that in the spec?

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.