Conventicle Act 1664

The Conventicle Act 1664 was an Act of the Parliament of England (16 Charles II c. 4[1]) that forbade conventicles, defined as religious assemblies of more than five people other than an immediate family, outside the auspices of the Church of England.[2]

A Covenanters Conventicle.[3]
Conventicle Act 1664
Long titleAn Act to prevent and suppresse seditious Conventicles
Citation16 Charles II c. 2
Dates
Commencement1664
Repealed1689
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted

A Conventicle Preacher before the Justices, painting by Robert Inerarity Herdman

This law was a part of the Clarendon Code, named after Edward Hyde, 1st Earl of Clarendon, which aimed to discourage nonconformism and to strengthen the position of the Established Church. However the Clarendon Code was not actually the work of Clarendon himself, who favoured a policy of greater tolerance towards dissenters.[4] These prohibitions led many, such as the Covenanters, to vacate their parishes rather than submit to the new Episcopal authorities. Just as the ministers left so too did the congregations, following their old pastors to sermons on the hillside. From small beginnings these field assemblies—or conventicles—were to grow into major problems of public order for the government.

The operation of the Clarendon Code at least as far as Protestants were concerned was mitigated somewhat by Charles II's Royal Declaration of Indulgence in 1672, which suspended the execution of the Penal Laws and allowed a certain number of non-conformist chapels to be staffed and constructed, with the pastors subject to royal approval.

The Conventicle Act was repealed in 1689.

Jewish reaction

Although aimed at Nonconformists, when the Conventicle Act was passed, the Jews led by their new rabbi, Jacob Sasportas, took their anxieties to Charles II, who told them, "laughing and spitting", not to worry; later the Privy Council put it in writing that Jews could "promise themselves the effects of the same favour as formerly they have had, so long as they demean themselves peaceably and quietly, with due obedience to His Majesty's laws and without scandal to his government". Thus the English Jews, by an act of omission, as it were, became full citizens, subject to no more disabilities than those inherent in their own unwillingness, like Catholics and Nonconformists, to belong to the Church of England or, in their particular case, to swear Christian oaths.[5]

gollark: Ah, yes, mati's is basically that but with a slightly higher clock rate and older architecture.
gollark: It's going to be basically the same - 2 hyperthreaded cores, terrible clock rate.
gollark: I said roughly.
gollark: Or at least roughly the same thing.
gollark: Might be it.

References
  1. This nomenclature is a reference to the statute book of the numbered year of the reign of the named King in the stated chapter. This is the method used for Acts of Parliament from before 1962. Although Charles II did not assume the throne until 1660, all legal documents were dated as if he had succeeded his father, Charles I, as king in 1649.
  2. Lodge, Richard (1923). The History of England From the Restoration to the Death of William III (1660–1702). p. 69. OCLC 740976301.
  3. Lawson, Rev. R. (1885). Maybole Past and Present. Pub. J. & R. Parlane. p. 49.
  4. History Learning Site – Clarendon Code
  5. Paul Johnson, A History of the Jews, p. 278


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.