Comparison of early word processors
This article compares early word processing software.
Operating system compatibility
This table gives a comparison of what operating systems are compatible with each word processor in 1985.
Word processor | Apple | Atari | CP/M | CPT | Commodore 64 | HP | IBM PC | Kaypro | Macintosh | Morrow | IBM PCjr | Rainbow 100 | TI Professional | Tandy | ZX Spectrum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tasword | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |
Homeword | II, IIc,IIe | 800 | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No |
MacWrite | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Pfs:Write | II, IIc,IIe | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No |
AtariWriter | No | 800XL, 1200 | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
OMNIWRITER | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Word Juggler | II,IIe,III | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
PC-Write | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No |
Wordvision | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Volkswriter deluxe | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No |
Perfect Writer | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Plu Perfect | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | 2,4,10 | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
Wordstar | II,IIe | No | Yes | No | No | 110,150 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | TRS-80 | No |
Newword | IIe | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
Appleworks | II, IIe | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
AppleWriter | II, IIe, III | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
III E-Z Pieces | III | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Symphony | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Framework | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
XY Write II+ | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
WordPerfect | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Tandy 2000 | No |
Microsoft Word | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Tandy 2000 | No |
CPT Word Processors | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No |
gollark: I think the most cost-effective internal HDDs right now are 10TB ones pulled from a certain brand of external hard drives... the mystical WD EasyStore.
gollark: Also, if you have an NVMe SSD, though, those are usually in the M.2 form factor, which means they use a few of the (usually one to three) M.2 slots on the board itself, and sometimes take away bandwidth from regular SATA ports.
gollark: HDDs are a bit stagnant right now, but SSDs continue to cheapen.
gollark: You'd certainly hope so.
gollark: You can put in as many as you want as long as you have SATA cables and internal space.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.