Coming Back (film)
Coming Back (귀로 - Gwiro) is a 1967 South Korean film directed by Lee Man-hee. It was chosen as Best Film at the Grand Bell Awards.[2][3][4]
| Coming Back | |
|---|---|
 Theatrical poster for Coming Back (1967) | |
| Hangul | 귀로 |
| Hanja | 歸路 |
| Revised Romanization | Gwiro |
| McCune–Reischauer | Kwiro |
| Directed by | Lee Man-hee[1] |
| Produced by | Woo Ki-dong |
| Written by | Baek Gyeol |
| Starring | Kim Jin-kyu |
| Music by | Jeon Jeong-geun |
| Cinematography | Lee Seok-gi |
| Edited by | Kim Hui-su |
| Distributed by | Seki Trading Co. |
Release date | 1967-07-27 |
Running time | 90 minutes |
| Country | South Korea |
| Language | Korean |
Synopsis
A melodrama about the wife of a handicapped war-veteran writer. Their marriage is tested when the wife is tempted by a romance with a younger man.[5]
Cast
- Kim Jin-kyu[4] as Choe Dong-u
- Moon Jung-suk as Ji-yeon
- Jeon Gye-hyeon as Choe I-yeong
Bibliography
- Gwilo on IMDb
- "Homebound ( Gwiro )(1967)". [KMDb Korean Movie Database]. Retrieved 2009-04-28.
- "GWILO". [The Complete Index to World Film]. Retrieved 2009-04-28.
- 귀로 (in Korean). [www.cine21.com]. Retrieved 2009-04-28.
Contemporary reviews
- August 5, 1967. "「[영화단평] 영육 갈등 여심의 방황, <귀로>」". The Dong-a Ilbo.[4]
Notes
- "Homebound ( Gwiro )(1967)". [KMDb Korean Movie Database]. Retrieved 2009-04-28.
- Lee Young-il, Richard Lynn Greever, tr. (1998). The History of Korean Cinema. Seoul: Motion Picture Promotion Corporation. pp. 5–278. ISBN 978-89-88095-12-6.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- "Grand Bell Awards, South Korea". Internet Movie Database. Retrieved 2009-04-26.
- "Homebound ( Gwiro )(1967)" (in Korean). [KMDb Korean Movie Database]. Retrieved 2009-04-26.
- Synopsis based on "Homebound ( Gwiro )(1967)". [KMDb Korean Movie Database]. Retrieved April 28, 2009.
| Preceded by The Sea Village |
Grand Bell Awards for Best Film 1967 |
Succeeded by Prince Daewon |
gollark: Well, the current concept of it is connected to that.
gollark: > ...that's what it isNo, it's *somewhat* tied to physical sex.
gollark: yes.
gollark: It would just be some ridiculous arbitrary identifier representing a bunch of something or other.
gollark: If they're NOT connected at all, why even HAVE gender?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.