Codd's cellular automaton

Codd's cellular automaton is a cellular automaton (CA) devised by the British computer scientist Edgar F. Codd in 1968. It was designed to recreate the computation- and construction-universality of von Neumann's CA but with fewer states: 8 instead of 29. Codd showed that it was possible to make a self-reproducing machine in his CA, in a similar way to von Neumann's universal constructor, but never gave a complete implementation.

A simple configuration in Codd's cellular automaton. Signals pass along wire made of cells in state 1 (blue) sheathed by cells in state 2 (red). Two signal trains circulate around a loop and are duplicated at a T-junction onto an open-ended section of wire. The first (7-0) causes the sheathed end of the wire to become exposed. The second (6-0) re-sheathes the exposed end, leaving the wire one cell longer than before.

History

In the 1940s and '50s, John von Neumann posed the following problem:[1]

  • What kind of logical organization is sufficient for an automaton to be able to reproduce itself?

He was able to construct a cellular automaton with 29 states, and with it a universal constructor. Codd, building on von Neumann's work, found a simpler machine with eight states.[2] This modified von Neumann's question:

  • What kind of logical organization is necessary for an automaton to be able to reproduce itself?

Three years after Codd's work, Edwin Roger Banks showed a 4-state CA in his PhD thesis that was also capable of universal computation and construction, but again did not implement a self-reproducing machine.[3] John Devore, in his 1973 masters thesis, tweaked Codd's rules to greatly reduce the size of Codd's design, to the extent that it could be implemented in the computers of that time. However, the data tape for self-replication was too long; Devore's original design was later able to complete replication using Golly. Christopher Langton made another tweak to Codd's cellular automaton in 1984 to create Langton's loops, exhibiting self-replication with far fewer cells than that needed for self-reproduction in previous rules, at the cost of removing the ability for universal computation and construction.[4]

Comparison of CA rulesets
CAnumber of statessymmetriescomputation- and construction-universalsize of self-reproducing machine
von Neumann29noneyes130,622 cells
Codd8rotationsyes283,126,588 cells[5]
Devore8rotationsyes94,794 cells
Banks IV (Banks IV Cellular Automaton)2 - 4 [6][7]rotations and reflectionsyesSomewhere around 100,000,000,000 cells
Langton's loops8rotationsno86 cells

Specification
The construction arm in Codd's CA can be moved into position using the commands listed in the text. Here the arm turns left, then right, then writes a cell before retracting along the same path.

Codd's CA has eight states determined by a von Neumann neighborhood with rotational symmetry.

The table below shows the signal-trains needed to accomplish different tasks. Some of the signal trains need to be separated by two blanks (state 1) on the wire to avoid interference, so the 'extend' signal-train used in the image at the top appears here as '70116011'.

purposesignal train
extend70116011
extend_left4011401150116011
extend_right5011501140116011
retract4011501160116011
retract_left5011601160116011
retract_right4011601160116011
mark701160114011501170116011
erase601170114011501160116011
sense70117011
cap40116011
inject_sheath701150116011
inject_trigger60117011701160116011

Universal computer-constructor

Codd designed a self-replicating computer in the cellular automaton, based on Wang's W-machine. However, the design was so colossal that it evaded implementation until 2009, when Tim Hutton constructed an explicit configuration.[5] There were some minor errors in Codd's design, so Hutton's implementation differs slightly, in both the configuration and the ruleset.

gollark: There was a self replicator built in CGoL some years back. It's hilariously complex and I think involves a universal constructor machine and computer thing.
gollark: They're not exactly his idea. Elementary CAs might be but the original concept is much older.
gollark: Cellular automata are pretty neat but Wolfram seems oddly obsessed with them.
gollark: It isn't suppressing free speech to say that something is stupid.
gollark: Sane physics has the concept of "nuclear fusion".

See also

References
  1. von Neumann, John; Burks, Arthur W. (1966). "Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata.". www.walenz.org. Archived from the original on 2008-01-05. Retrieved 2012-01-28.
  2. Codd, Edgar F. (1968). Cellular Automata. Academic Press, New York.
  3. Banks, Edwin (1971). Information Processing and Transmission in Cellular Automata. PhD thesis, MIT, Department of Mechanical Engineering.
  4. Langton, C. G. (1984). "Self-Reproduction in Cellular Automata" (PDF). Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 10 (1–2): 135–144. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(84)90256-2.
  5. Hutton, Tim J. (2010). "Codd's self-replicating computer" (PDF). Artificial Life. 16 (2): 99–117. doi:10.1162/artl.2010.16.2.16200. PMID 20067401.
  6. http://www.bottomlayer.com/bottom/banks/banks_commentary_03.htm
  7. http://www.bottomlayer.com/bottom/banks/banks_thesis_1971.pdf
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.