Coalition of the willing

The term coalition of the willing refers to the US-led Multi-National Force – Iraq, the military command during the 2003 invasion of Iraq and much of the ensuing Iraq War. The coalition was led by the United States of America.

Usage over Iraq
Further information: Multi-National Force – Iraq and The letter of the eight
The "Coalition of the willing" named by the US State Department in 2003.

In November 2002, U.S. President George W. Bush, visiting Europe for a NATO summit, declared that "should Iraqi President Saddam Hussein choose not to disarm, the United States will lead a coalition of the willing to disarm him."[1]

The Bush administration briefly used "coalition of the willing" to refer to the countries who supported, militarily or politically, the 2003 invasion of Iraq and subsequent military presence in post-invasion Iraq. The original list released in March 2003 included 46 members.[2] In April 2003, the list was updated to include 49 countries, though it was reduced to 48 after Costa Rica objected[3] to its inclusion. Of the 48 countries on the list, three contributed troops to the invasion force (the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland). An additional 37 countries provided some number of troops to support military operations after the invasion was complete.

The list of coalition members provided by the White House included several nations that did not intend to participate in actual military operations. Some of them, such as Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Palau and Solomon Islands, did not have standing armies. However, through the Compact of Free Association, citizens of the Marshall Islands, Palau and the Federated States of Micronesia are guaranteed US national status and therefore are allowed to serve in the US military. The members of these island nations have deployed in a combined Pacific force consisting of Guamanian, Hawaiian and Samoan reserve units. They have been deployed twice to Iraq. The government of one country, the Solomon Islands, listed by the White House as a member of the coalition, was apparently unaware of any such membership and promptly denied it.[4] According to a 2010 study, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Palau (and Tonga and the Solomon Islands to a lesser extent) were all economically dependent on economic aid from the United States, and thus had an economic incentive to join the Coalition of the Willing.[5]

In December 2008, University of Illinois Professor Scott Althaus reported that he had learned that the White House was editing and back-dating revisions to the list of countries in the coalition.[6][7] Althaus found that some versions of the list had been entirely removed from the record, and that others contradicted one another, as opposed to the procedure of archiving original documents and supplementing them with later revisions and updates.[2]

By August 2009, all non-U.S./UK coalition members had withdrawn from Iraq.[8] As a result, the Multinational Force – Iraq was renamed and reorganized to United States Forces – Iraq as of January 1, 2010. Thus the Coalition of the Willing came to an official end.

Other usages

One early use was by President Bill Clinton in June 1994 in relation to possible operations against North Korea, at the height of the 1994 stand-off with that country over nuclear weapons.[9]

It has also been applied to the Australian-led INTERFET operation in East Timor.

Criticism of use

Specific uses of the phrase in the context of disarming Iraq began appearing in mid-2001.[10]

Salon columnist Laura McClure, noting the large amounts of foreign aid being offered in exchange for supporting the Iraq War, referred to Bush's coalition as the "Coalition of the billing".[11] British activist Tariq Ali made a similar point, describing it as a "coalition of the shilling".[12]

In the second debate in 2004 U.S. presidential election, Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry questioned the size of the coalition participating in the initial invasion, saying, "...when we went in, there were three countries: Great Britain, Australia and the United States. That's not a grand coalition. We can do better". Bush responded by saying, "Well, actually, he forgot Poland. And now there're 30 nations involved, standing side by side with our American troops". The phrase "You forgot Poland" subsequently became a sarcastic shorthand for the perception that most members of the coalition were not contributing much to the war effort compared to the main three allies. The majority of the population in most countries involved did not, according to surveys, support the endeavour or their nation's participation.[13]

Late U.S. Sen. Robert Byrd, then ranking Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, referred to the coalition by the acronym COW, expressing his concern that the United States was being "milked" as a "cash cow". A Canadian Member of Parliament, Carolyn Parrish, referred to Canadian support for the U.S. national missile defense program as the "Coalition of the Idiots".[14]

In Dude, Where's My Country?, Michael Moore argues that the very idea of a "coalition of the willing" was inaccurate. In making his case, Moore notes that most of the countries contributing troops to the coalition were small countries with practically no economic clout, and that the countries' general populations opposed the invasion.

gollark: Idea: Python but with curly brackets and any spaces are an error.
gollark: Palaiologos seemed to assume it was Pythonical.
gollark: So is Epicbot. It can eval things. And reverse things. And [REDACTED] memetic hazard generation.
gollark: Why are those superior to epicbot?
gollark: Thus it is additionally cursed.

References
  1. "Bush: Join 'coalition of willing'". CNN. 2002-11-20. Retrieved 2010-04-30.
  2. Althaus, Scott; Leetaru, Kalev (November 25, 2008). "Airbrushing History, American Style". University of Illinois Cline Center for Democracy. Retrieved 13 September 2015.
  3. "Costa Rica Asks to Be Taken Off U.S. List of Iraq Coalition Partners". Los Angeles Times. From Associated Press. 10 September 2004. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  4. Perrott, A.: "Coalition of the Willing? Not us, say Solomon islanders". The New Zealand Herald, March 27, 2003..
  5. Wivel, Anders (2010). "Security, profit or shadow of the past? Explaining the security strategies of microstates". Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 23 (3): 429–453. doi:10.1080/09557571.2010.484047.
  6. Kelly Gibbs (2008-12-05). "White House documents found to be altered". Daily Illini. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
  7. Byrne, John (December 5, 2008). "White House altered, deleted press releases on 'coalition of the willing'". The Raw Story. Retrieved September 1, 2013.
  8. "United States Department of Defense" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-09-02.
  9. Ibiblio.org (originally official White House release), Interview with the President by Sam Donaldson ABC, June 5, 1994.
  10. "International Contributions to the War Against Terrorism". 2001-2009.state.gov. U.S. Department of Defense, Office of Public Affairs. 2002-06-14. Retrieved 2019-12-03.
  11. "Coalition of the billing -- or unwilling?". Salon.com. 2003-12-03.
  12. Alternative Radio Australia - Tariq Ali Retrieved September 28, 2015
  13. Iraq Poll 2003 Archived 2009-01-26 at the Wayback Machine Gallup International Association
  14. "Missile defence for 'coalition of the idiots': Liberal MP".
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.