Cistophorus

The cistophorus (Ancient Greek: κιστοφόρος, kistophoros) was a coin of ancient Pergamum. It was introduced shortly before 190 B.C. at that city to provide the Attalid kingdom with a substitute for Seleucid coins and the tetradrachms of Philetairos. It was also used by a number of other cities that were under Attalid control. These cities included Alabanda and Kibyra.[1] It continued to be minted and circulated down to the time of Hadrian, long after the kingdom was bequeathed to Rome. It owes its name to a figure, on the obverse, of the sacred chest (Latin: cista) of Dionysus.

Cistophorus minted in Apollonis under the reign of Aristonicus (133–130 BC), Cabinet des Médailles

Cistophoric standard

It was tariffed at four drachmas, but weighed only as much as three Attic drachmas (the most important weight standard of the time),[1] 12.75 grams. In addition, the evidence of hoards suggests that it did not travel outside the area which Pergamum controlled. It is therefore suspected that it was overvalued in this area.

In any case, the result was a closed monetary system similar to that in the Ptolemaic Kingdom. It is likely that this was a deliberate policy.[2][3]

Design and themes

Cistophoric coinage fails to portray reigning kings in its coins. It is possible that this lack of royal iconography is the result of Attalid royal ideology. The royal coinage is mimicking itself as a federal coinage. Attalid kings were unable to portray themselves as a charismatic and militaristic authority like the other Hellenistic rulers, as the kingdom during reign of Eumenes II received much of its power practically as a Roman gift. He portrayed himself as a benefactor of the Greeks living within Asia Minor.[3]

The types reflect the Attalid kings' claims of descent from Dionysus and Heracles.[4] The cista mystica on the obverse represents Dionysius while the bow case on the reverse represents Heracles, whose son, Telephus, was the mythological founder of Pergamon.

gollark: I said "simplest solution", not "most likely" then, though I think the Wyatt hypothesis is both.
gollark: It is not proof. Proof is not really available for anything beyond logic and maths. But epistemology is a bit irrelevant.
gollark: The simplest solution is that you *are* WyattPlayzPC. Obviously.
gollark: And is quite similar to you.
gollark: It's a bunch of things all of which push up my estimate of how likely it is that you're Wyatt.

References
  1. Otto Mørkholm (31 May 1991). Early Hellenistic Coinage from the Accession of Alexander to the Peace of Apamaea (336-188 BC). Cambridge University Press. pp. 9–10. ISBN 978-0-521-39504-5.
  2. Philip Kay (23 January 2014). Rome's Economic Revolution. OUP Oxford. p. 97. ISBN 978-0-19-150735-9.
  3. Peter Thonemann (14 January 2016). The Hellenistic World: Using Coins as Sources. Cambridge University Press. p. 80. ISBN 978-1-107-08696-8.
  4. Kenneth W. Harl "Livy and the Date of the Introduction of the Cistophoric Tetradrachma," Classical Antiquity Vol. 10, No. 2 (1991), page 269
  • Cistophorus, article in Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.