Chungjeongno-dong

Chungjeongno-dong is a dong, neighbourhood of Seodaemun-gu in Seoul, South Korea.[1]

Chungjeongno-dong
Korean transcription(s)
  Hangul충정로동
  Hanja
  Revised RomanizationChung jeongno dong
  McCune–ReischauerCh'ung chŏngno tong
CountrySouth Korea
Area
  Total0.51 km2 (0.20 sq mi)
Population
 (2001)[1]
  Total8,729
  Density17,000/km2 (44,000/sq mi)

Chung Jeung No

Chung Jeung No is a Road that is located in Seoul, Seodaemun-gu chungjeungno 2 ga 8-2 through chungjeungno 3 ga 44

The Road is 40 meters wide and 0.9 km long. It is an 8 lined arterial highway, which connects gwanghwamun, sinchon, and mapo-gu.

Chungjeongno used to be called Jookchumjeong, named by Japanese during the Japanese colonial era but renamed to its current title in October 1 of 1984, by South Korean Government named after the joseon's loyalist Min Yonghwan's posthumous name

Chungjeongno used to be 1.5 km long, but it was shorten about 700 m in November 7 of 1984 to current length. noticeable passing cities are seodaemun-gu, chungjeongno-dong, Bugahyeon-dong, Migeun-dong, Migeun-dong, and mapo-gu ahyeon-dong

Subway

Chungjeongno-dong has two very convenient subway stations called Chungjeongno Station, which are Seoul Subway Line 2 and Seoul Subway Line 2. These two subway lines allow people to travel everywhere in city of Seoul within an hour.

Notable Places

  • Mi-dong Elementary school - Mi-Dong is one of the earliest elementary school established in South Korea. The school was established in 1895, started as a primary school and changed its format to Elementary school and had its first graduation in 1906
  • Korean Salvation Army Building - cost of construction was estimated to 50 Million. Many criticisms are being targeted to its organization and the fundings of the construction.
gollark: Fascinating.
gollark: This depends on whether there is a fourth spatial dimension.
gollark: I'm not saying it's entirely wrong, just mostly wrong.
gollark: This is very incoherent. And yes, it's often hard to analyze complex scenarios, but that does *not* mean that the correct answer is "disavow the entire concept of analyzing things".
gollark: The Chinese remainder theorem?

See also

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.